The primary objective of this study is to determine if a cervical hardness score (determined by cervical ultrasound with elastography) can predict delivery mode (vaginal versus cesarian for slow dilatation (more than 2-3h without fetal suffering) regardless of the induction mode (ocytocin alone or with an intravaginal device releasing PGE2).
The secondary objectives of this study are: A. To determine composite criteria (combining elastographic, parity and Bishop score information) that predict delivery mode. B. To determine the prognostic value of elastography as concerns delivery within 24 hours among patients induced via oxytocin with an intravaginal device releasing PGE2 (Bishop score \< 6). C. To determine the prognostic value of elastography as concerns delivery mode (vaginal versus cesarian for slow dilatation (more than 2-3h without fetal suffering))among patients induced via oxytocin alone. D. To evaluate the intra- and inter-operator reproducibility of the cervical hardness score determined via elastography. E. To evaluate the economic impact of using the cervical hardness score from the point of view of the French social system (French health insurance) and the hospital.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
95
Following routine vaginal exam with determination of Bishop's score, cervical ultrasound with elastography will be used to determine a cervical hardness score varying from 1 to 10. Patients are then hospitalized and labor induced 12 to 48 hours after the elastography.
CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes, France
Cervical hardness score
A score varying from 0 to 10 determined during cervical ultrasound with elastography.
Time frame: Day 0 (baseline)
Mode of delivery: vaginal delivery versus cesarean
Time frame: Day 2
Bishop score
Time frame: Day 0 (baseline)
Parity
Time frame: Day 0 (baseline)
Time lapsed between labor induction and delivery
Time frame: Day 2
Induction mode
oxytocin alone or with an intravaginal device releasing PGE2
Time frame: Day 0 (baseline)
Cervical hardness score for reproductibility 1
Second reading (by the same, original operator) of ultrasound+elastography recording
Time frame: Day 0 (baseline)
Cervical hardness score for reproductibility 2
Third reading (by a second operator) of ultrasound+elastography recording
Time frame: Day 0 (baseline)
Cost of hospital stay
Time frame: Expected average of 4-5 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.