Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent condition, affecting 1.8 per 1,000 people every year. Admission to hospital is one of the main risk factors for VTE, and could account for up to 20% of all VTE, making VTE prevention in admitted patients an appealing option to reduce VTE global burden. The landmark MEDENOX trial and others demonstrated the efficacy of low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in reducing a composite outcome of symptomatic and asymptomatic events, the latter accounting for the vast majority of events. Publication of these trials led to the implementation of thromboprophylaxis policies in hospitals, which acceptance has been variable. More recently, the use of thromboprophylaxis has been challenged after the publication of 1) a negative trial that used 'death from any cause' as main outcome, 2) a systematic review showing the lack of a clear efficacy on the risk of pulmonary embolism or death, 3) negative trials using new oral anticoagulants, 4) the last version of the American College of Chest Physicians Guidelines, focusing on symptomatic events only, downgraded its recommendation for thromboprophylaxis in medical patients to a 1B recommendation, restricting its use to patients 'at increased risk of thrombosis' and recommending against the use of thromboprophylaxis in patients at low risk of thrombosis, patients bleeding or at high risk of bleeding. However, a limitation of this interpretation of the data is that in most trials, patients with screened asymptomatic events were treated with anticoagulants, preventing the occurrence of symptomatic events during follow-up. Moreover, subgroup analyses showed that elderly patients were at high risk of thrombosis in these trials, and that LMWH could be particularly efficient in this subgroup of patients. Conversely, their risk of bleeding is also higher than in younger patients and the current trials were not powered to detect a difference in the bleeding risk between groups. Finally, the diagnostic and therapeutic management of VTE is more challenging in the elderly. Therefore, we planned a randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of LMWH for the prevention of symptomatic VTE in elderly patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
2,560
Centre Hospitalier d'Agen
Agen, France
CHU Angers
Angers, France
CH Angoulême
Angoulême, France
CH d'Arras
Arras, France
CH Béthune
Béthune, France
Hôpital Jean Verdier (APHP)
Bondy, France
Occurence of the following events: symptomatic confirmed deep venous thrombosis (DVT), symptomatic confirmed pulmonary embolism (PE), or fatal PE
Time frame: Occurence of any of the events through the Day 30 visit
Occurence of the following events: Major bleeding, clinically relevant non major bleeding, symptomatic confirmed VTE (DVT or PE) or fatal PE, atherothrombotic cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death, Death from any cause.
The secondary outcomes is the occurrence of any of the following events: * Major bleeding as defined by the criteria of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis at day 30 and day 90 * Clinically relevant non major bleeding and any bleeding at day 30 and day 90 * Symptomatic confirmed VTE (DVT or PE) or fatal PE through the day 90 visit * Atherothrombotic cardiovascular events at day 30 and day 90 * Cardiovascular death at day 30 and day 90 * Death from any cause at day 30 and day 90 * Rate of VTE and bleeding events at day 30 and day 90 according to creatinin clearance (\< 50 ml/min and ≥ 50 ml/min), age range, D-dimer level and the use or not of antiplatelet therapy to identified the population at risk for VTE and bleeding.
Time frame: Occurence of any of the events through the Day 30 and Day 90 visit
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
CHU Bordeaux
Bordeaux, France
HIA Clermont-Tonnerre
Brest, France
CHRU Brest
Brest, France
CH Public du Cotentin
Cherbourg, France
...and 36 more locations