The purpose of this study is to determine whether 40 mg octreotide long-acting release intramuscular every 28 days is effective in the treatment of patients with refractory anemia due to gastrointestinal angiodysplasias. We hypothesize that octreotide is effective in reducing the transfusion requirements (consisting of red blood cell transfusions and intravenous iron infusions) of patients with angiodysplasia-related anemia.
Rationale: Gastrointestinal angiodysplasias are a common source of intractable small bowel bleeding, especially in older patients. Endoscopic ablation of angiodysplasias has limited efficacy and rebleeding rates are substantial. Recurrent bleeding results in refractory anemia which is managed with blood transfusions and/or iron infusions. Transfusion dependency reduces quality of life and is associated with substantial cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Small cohort studies suggest a beneficial effect of octreotide in bleeding angiodysplasias, but evidence from rigorous, well-controlled studies are lacking. Objective: To assess the efficacy of octreotide in reducing the transfusion requirements (consisting of blood transfusions and iron infusions) of patients with refractory anemia due to gastrointestinal angiodysplasias despite endoscopic intervention. Study design: Multicenter, randomized, open-label intervention study. Study population: Patients aged 18 years or older with transfusion-dependent anemia due to endoscopically confirmed angiodysplasias. Transfusion units consist of iron infusions (of 500 milligrams \[mg\]) and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. At least one endoscopic attempt to treat the angiodysplasias needs to be recorded unless contra-indications are present. Patients with liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh C or liver failure, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (defined by a glycated hemoglobin \>64 mmol/mL), symptomatic cholecystolithiasis, and pregnant or nursing women, are regarded as ineligible because of the pharmacological profile of octreotide. Patients with hereditary hemorrhagic diseases or hematological disorders on active treatment, other alternative causes of gastrointestinal bleeding, presence of left ventricular assist devices, as well as patients with cancer under active treatment, and those with a life expectancy \<1 year are excluded from enrolment Intervention: Patients will be randomized (1:1) into two groups. The intervention group receives 40 mg octreotide long-acting release (Sandostatin LAR) every 28 days for a total period of 52 weeks as an adjunct to standard of care. The control group receives standard of care along. The last follow-up visit is in week 60. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is defined as the mean difference in blood (RBC transfusions per 500 ml or packed cells) and parenteral iron (IV iron infusions per 500 mg) requirements between the intervention and control group, corrected for baseline transfusion requirements and follow-up time.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
62
Two injections of 20 mg will be given monthly.
Gelre Hospital
Apeldoorn, Gelderland, Netherlands
Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc)
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Jeroen Bosch Hospital
's-Hertogenbosch, North Brabant, Netherlands
Catharina Hospital
Eindhoven, North Brabant, Netherlands
Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital
Tilburg, North Brabant, Netherlands
Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis
Delft, South Holland, Netherlands
St. Antonius Hospital
Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
Rijnstate Hospital
Arnhem, Netherlands
University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG)
Groningen, Netherlands
Tjongerschans Hospital
Heerenveen, Netherlands
...and 2 more locations
Difference in blood and parenteral iron requirements (transfusion units)
The mean difference in blood (RBC transfusions per 500 ml or packed cells) and parenteral iron (IV iron infusions per 500 mg) requirements between the intervention and standard of care arm, corrected for baseline transfusion requirements and follow-up time.
Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)
Proportion with a good treatment response
The proportion of patients in both groups that experienced a ≥50% (defined as a good response) and 100% (defined as a full response) reduction in the number of transfusion units received during the study year compared to baseline
Time frame: During the study year (52 weeks) compared to the year (52 weeks) before randomization
Use of concomitant care
The proportion of patients in both groups that required concomitant care. Concomitant care consists of application of APC, discontinuation of antithrombotics, use of tranexamic acid, and starting octreotide in the control group.
Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)
Difference in endoscopic procedures
The mean difference in endoscopic procedures between both groups.
Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)
Difference in bleeding episodes
The mean difference in bleeding episodes between both groups. A bleeding episode is defined as each non-contiguous episode in which hospital care is sought for anemia.
Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)
Difference in healthcare utilization
The mean difference in healthcare utilization between both groups. Healthcare utilization consists of hospital admissions, ambulatory care, and emergency care.
Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)
Difference in hemoglobin levels
The mean difference in serum hemoglobin levels (mmol/L) between both groups.
Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)
Difference in ferritin levels
The mean difference in serum ferritin levels (ug/L) between both groups.
Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)
Difference in fatigue levels
The mean difference in fatigue levels between both groups. Fatigue is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), measured by the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), which covers five dimensions of fatigue affect and -tolerability. MFI-20 scores range from 20 (best) to 100 (worst).
Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)
Difference in quality of life
The mean difference in quality of life between both groups. Quality of life is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), measured by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), which uses eight subdomains to evaluate physical- and mental health. SF-36 scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)
Difference in adverse events
The proportion of patients in both groups that experienced at least one adverse event (AE).
Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)
Difference in serious adverse events
The proportion of patients in both groups that experienced at least one serious adverse event (SAE).
Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)
Difference in mortality
The proportion of patients in both groups that died during the study.
Time frame: Study year (52 weeks)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.