The primary objective of this case-control intervention study to explore the effectiveness of non surgical periodontal therapy on the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) levels of sclerostin in patients with chronic periodontitis (CP) so as to get a more detailed insight into its diagnostic and prognostic potential as a biomarker of periodontal disease.
All individuals underwent a full-mouth periodontal examination, which included probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP). Individuals were categorized into three groups: individuals with clinically healthy periodontium (group 1), patients with chronic periodontitis (group 2), and group 3 consisted of the patients with chronic periodontitis (group 2), treated by scaling and root planning. GCF samples in grup 1 were taken at baseline. In group 2, GCF samples were taken before and after non- surgical periodontal treatment. Sclerostin, OPG and RANKL levels were determined using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
54
1. SRP under local anaesthesia, in a total of four clinical visits 2. Oral hygiene instructions including the modified Bass technique, regular toothpaste, and an appropriate interdental cleaning device with dental floss and interdental brush.
Biochemical parameters (Sclerostin levels, RANKL/OPG ratio )
The changes in levels of sclerostin, OPG and RANKL 6 weeks after periodontal treatment determined by ELISA. The changes in levels of sclerostin were analyzed to determine diagnostic and prognostic potential as a biomarker of periodontal disease. The relative RANKL/OPG ratio (bone resorption marker) was also calculated to detect the relationship between sclerostin levels.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks after treatment
Probing pocket depth
The changes in probing pocket depth after periodontal treatment.Probing pocket depth was measured for determining severity of disease and clinic outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks after treatment
Probing pocket depth and clinical attachment level
The changes in clinical attachment level after periodontal treatment. Clinical attachment level was measured for determining severity of disease and clinic outcome. Also, clinical attachment level was also analyzed to detect the relationship between sclerostin, OPG and RANKL levels.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks after treatment
Gingival index
The changes in gingival index after periodontal treatment. Gingival index was recorded for classifying and evaluating (coronally) gingival inflammation. Also, gingival index was also analyzed to detect the relationship between sclerostin, OPG and RANKL levels.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks after treatment
Plaque index
The changes in plaque index after periodontal treatment. Plaque index was recorded for determining and classifying oral hygiene status.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks after treatment
Bleeding on probing
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The changes in bleeding on probing after periodontal treatment. Bleeding on probing was recorded for classifying and evaluating (apically) gingival inflammation.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks after treatment