Atrial fibrillation is a common heart rhythm disturbance, causing important discomfort for patients, a high risk of stroke, frequent hospital admissions and a two-fold increase in death. The number of patients with this condition are expected to double in the next 20 years. Medications to control heart-rate are used in the majority of patients, although the choice of agent is often guided by local preference rather than evidence from controlled trials. Despite the fact that patients with atrial fibrillation have high rates of other cardiac conditions such as heart failure, clinicians have insufficient evidence to personalise the use of different therapies. This feasibility study will allow us to develop a range of methods that can characterise patients according to the pumping and relaxing function of the heart, the burden of symptoms and to identify new blood markers. In this way, the investigators hope to improve clinical practice guidelines, allowing doctors to prescribe appropriate treatments for the right patients. The research will be focused around a randomised trial of two medication strategies, providing much-needed data on the comparison of digoxin and beta-blockers (two commonly-used drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation). It will also allow us to identify the best way to record patient-reported quality of life and develop robust techniques to determine heart function using non-invasive imaging, facilitating the conduct of a large-scale clinical trial. The key objectives of the research programme are to define the optimal medications for patients with atrial fibrillation and identify the most valid, reproducible and cost-effective methods to examine patients. The ultimate aim of the project is to improve clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation, benefiting patients, the National Health Service and the global community.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasingly common cardiac condition that leads to a substantial burden on quality-of-life (QoL), an increased risk of cardiovascular events, hospitalisation and death, and significant healthcare costs for the NHS. In addition to anti-coagulation and considerations for rhythm control therapy, most patients with AF are in need of pharmacological control of heart rate. This aspect of care has not received stringent investigation, with treatment guidelines based on small crossover studies and observational data rather than robust controlled trials. Beta-blocker monotherapy remains the first-line option in the current NICE AF guidelines consultation document, with digoxin only for sedentary patients, although this recommendation is based on 'very low-quality evidence'. The benefit of different rate-control therapies on symptoms and other intermediate outcomes (such as left-ventricular ejection fraction \[LVEF\] and diastolic function) are unknown, as are their effects on clinical events such as hospitalisation. This situation is unacceptable in light of the potential benefits and risk of different rate-control options in AF. It also limits our ability to personalise treatment according to patient characteristics. The RAte control Therapy Evaluation in permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RATE-AF) trial is informed by a number of in-depth systematic reviews of management and clinical outcomes in AF patients. Taken together, this information provides a sound basis to plan a major randomised controlled trial (RCT). However as trials of rate-control in AF have typically been small or uncontrolled, further information is needed before designing a trial that can assess clinical outcomes. The RATE-AF trial will allow us to define appropriate primary and secondary outcome measures and their standard deviation in a contemporary population of patients with permanent AF. This information will allow us to estimate sample size, determination of recruitment, retention and adherence policies, and to ascertain the best methods of obtaining adverse event data and reliable economic costs for a larger trial assessing cardiovascular outcomes and hospitalization. The RATE-AF trial will also be the largest RCT of its kind, allowing us to compare the effect of beta-blockers and digoxin on QoL as initial rate-control therapy in patients with permanent AF. The long-term aim of the research is to answer key questions about how to initiate therapy, stratified by relevant patient characteristics such as systolic and diastolic cardiac function, baseline symptoms and concurrent medication. The research will also define the patho-physiological mechanisms underlying AF-related symptoms, left-ventricular function and their association with adverse clinical outcomes, and to identify clinical markers for the response to different rate control therapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
161
Drug intervention
Drug intervention
City Hospital
Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
Patient Reported Quality of Life (SF-36)
Patient-reported outcomes as assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire physical component score. The physical component score ranges from 0-100 where higher value indicates better outcome.
Time frame: Primary outcome at 6 months timepoint.
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
The above parameters will be measured using echocardiography and diastolic indices
Time frame: 12 months
Diastolic Function- Measured by the E/e'.
The above parameters will be measured using echocardiography and diastolic indices. E/e' - the ratio between early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic velocity.
Time frame: 12 months
B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) at 6 Months.
B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) at 6 months.
Time frame: 6 months
Composite Functional Status Measures- 6 Minute Walking Distance at 12 Months.
Composite functional status measures- 6 minute walking distance at 12 months.
Time frame: 12 months
Patient Reported Outcomes- (AFEQT) at 12 Months.
As assessed using the AFEQT overall score at 12 months. The range for AFEQT overall score is from 0= complete disability to 100=no disability.
Time frame: 12 months
Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months.
As assessed using the SF-36 version 2 global and specific scores at 12 months. All domains presented are between 0 to 100 scale where the higher score indicates better outcomes.
Time frame: 12 months
Patient Reported Outcomes (EQ-5D-5L)
As assessed using the EQ-5D-5L summary index questionnaires at both 6 and 12 months. The range for summary index is from -0.594=worst score to 1=best score
Time frame: 12 months
Ambulatory Heart-rate.
24 hour ambulatory heart-rate.
Time frame: Within 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.