Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a very prevalent metabolic disorder in the adult population affecting roughly 17.7 million people in the US alone. The harmful effect of DM on implant integration and survival has been attributed to vascular complications in the alveolar bone that lead to compromised blood supply and decreased bone density. Nonetheless, the specific detrimental effects of DM in the alveolar bone have not been investigated in humans. People with DM generally lose more teeth than persons without diabetes, but implant placement in not well controlled diabetics is not routinely performed due to the lack of relevant evidence and the risk for implant failure and associated complications. Chemically modified, micro-rough, hydrophilic (SLActive®) titanium implant surfaces have been shown to accelerate osseointegration of dental implants placed in diabetic animals. It has been hypothesized that this enhanced biologic response is due to the biocompatibility and hydrophilicity of the surface that actively attracts blood and is populated by progenitor cells, and growth factors that improve stromal cell differentiation. Hypotheses: It is hypothesized that hyperglycemia results in compromised vascularity in the mandible. Thus, hydrophilic TiZr implant surfaces (Roxolid®) that actively attract fluids and possess excellent osteoconductive properties, may enhance peri-implant bone response in diabetic patients to levels comparable to well-controlled diabetics.
A high level of evidence exists to support the placement of implants in type 2 diabetics with glucosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels within the normoglycemic range. Less information is available for the integration of implants placed in diabetics that cannot achieve good glycemic control, who may represent up to 50% of the diabetic patient population. Recent data from the medical literature have unveiled the deleterious effect of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) on the bone marrow. The microvascular alterations of DM on skeletal bones lead to microangiopathy, reduced blood flow and fatty degeneration in the bone marrow. Nascent theories that are founded upon the observation of increased levels of soluble osteoprotegerin (OPG) levels in uncontrolled DM implicate disruption of RANKL/OPG signaling as a potential pathway for the diabetes- related bone alterations. Nonetheless, no data is currently available on the pathophysiology of the alveolar bone in patients with DM. It is hypothesized that 1) hyperglycemia results in compromised vascularity in the mandible, thus 2) hydrophilic TiZr implant surfaces (Roxolid®) that actively attract fluids and possess excellent osteoconductive properties, may enhance peri-implant bone response in not well-controlled diabetics (NCD) to levels comparable to well-controlled diabetics (WCD). We further hypothesize that the expected decreased RANKL/OPG ratio in NCD versus WCD will not recover during post-surgery bone remodeling. To assess our hypotheses, we will recruit n=21 type II WCD (HbA1c≤7.0%) and n=21 type II NCD (7.5%\<HbA1c≤10%) seeking implant placement in the mandible. We will collect intra-operative bone specimens at baseline and blood samples to assess bone structural alterations (H\&E stain), microvascular density (immunohistochemistry), bound RANKL/OPG (immunohistochemistry) and serum RANKL/OPG (ELISA). Implant integration and success will be assessed at 3, 6, 12 and 36-months. Obtained results will give dental researchers new insights into the pathophysiology of the alveolar bone in diabetes and will provide information on the safety and efficacy of implant placement in type II diabetic patients that cannot control their glycemic status. Collectively, this work will pave the way for identifying efficacious implant treatment modalities for persons that live with type II diabetes to alleviate the morbidity associated with tooth loss in this susceptible population group.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
42
Each individual will receive one implant (4.1 Titanium-Zirconia, hydrophilic-Roxolid), that will be placed in the posterior mandible.
Each individual will receive one implant (4.1 Titanium-Zirconia, hydrophilic-Roxolid), that will be placed in the posterior mandible.
University of Minnesota Advanced Education in Periodontology
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
University of Texas
Houston, Texas, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Differences in alveolar bone vascularity among well-controlled and not well-controlled diabetic patients.
The difference between alveolar bone vascularity of well-controlled and not well-controlled diabetic patients by immunostaining
Time frame: Baseline (intra-operative bone sample)
RANK-L to OPG ratio
A comparison between RANK-L to OPG ratio to determine the state of bone remodeling in each cohort.
Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.