This randomized phase II trial studies how well vaccine therapy works in reducing the frequency of cytomegalovirus severe infections (events) in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing donor stem cell transplant. Vaccines made from a peptide may help the body build an effective immune response and may reduce cytomegalovirus events after donor stem cell transplant.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine if cytomegalovirus (CMV) peptide(Pep)vaccine(Vax) (CMVpp65-A\*0201 peptide vaccine) increases levels, function and kinetics of CMV-specific T cell immunity in vaccinated compared to placebo treated human leukocyte antigen (HLA) A\*0201 allogeneic CMV positive hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients (HCT-R+). (Entire cohort) II. To provide a preliminary evaluation of the incidence of CMV reactivation between day 56 and day 180 in patients who receive standard letermovir (Prevymis) prophylaxis (from day 14 through day 100), comparable to the evaluation of an expansion cohort in a pilot study, or the futility stage of a phase II trial. (Letermovir combination cohort) III. To determine if CMVPepVax increases levels, function and kinetics of CMV-specific T cell immunity in vaccinated HCT patients who receive standard Prevymis prophylaxis. (Letermovir combination cohort) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine, within the constraints of a pilot cohort, if CMVPepVax reduces the frequency of CMV events alone or in combination with Prevymis defined as reactivation or CMV disease in HLA A\*0201 allogeneic HCT-R+. II. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of CMVPepVax by assessing the following: non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days post HCT, severe (grade 3-4) acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) (aGVHD), and grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[CTCAE\] 4.0) probably or definitely related to the vaccination within 2 weeks from each vaccination. III. To characterize CMV reactivation and CMV disease in recipients of CMVPepVax compared to placebo by assessing time-to viremia (defined as number of days from transplantation to the date of \>= 500 CMV gc/mL), duration of viremia, recurrence of viremia, incidence of late CMV viremia/disease (\> 100 and =\< 360 days post HCT), use of antiviral drugs (triggered by clinically significant viremia), cumulative number of CMV specific antiviral treatment days. IV. To determine whether vaccination induces adaptive natural killer (NK) cell population changes, and increase in the highly cytotoxic memory NKG2C+ NK cells. V. To determine the impact of CMVPepVax on CMV immune reconstitution in patients who undergo treatment with antiviral agent Prevymis. VI. To explore GVHD biomarkers and compare between the vaccine and placebo groups. VII. To characterize CMV reactivation after day 180 OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive CMVpp65-A\*0201 peptide vaccine subcutaneously (SC) on days 28 and 56 after HCT. ARM II: Patients receive placebo SC on days 28 and 56 after HCT. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up to day 365 after HCT.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
61
City of Hope Medical Center
Duarte, California, United States
Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
University of Minnesota/Masonic Cancer Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Cumulative Incidence of CMV at 100 Days
The primary endpoint was CMV event. A CMV event encompasses detection of CMV by either qPCR (termed "reactivation": DNAemia at ≥500 gc/ml = 1250iu/ml) or by tissue histology (end-organ disease). The cumulative incidence was calculated as competing risks using the method of Gooley with death viewed as a competing risk.
Time frame: Up to day 100 after HCT
Non-Relapse Mortality (NRM) at 100 Days
NRM was defined as death without recurrent or progressive disease after transplant. Probabilities of NRM were calculated as competing risks using the method of Gooley with relapse viewed as a competing risk.
Time frame: Up to 100 days after transplant
Cumulative Incidence of Relapse at One Year
Probabilities of relapse were calculated as competing risks using the method of Gooley with death viewed as a competing risk.
Time frame: Up to 365 days after HCT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.