Adjudicated youth often have traumatic stress responses but rarely receive treatment for these problems. This study is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate two alternative implementation strategies for providing an evidence-based trauma treatment, Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT), to therapist who treat adjudicated youth in 18 residential treatment facilities (RTF) in New Hampshire, Vermont, and Connecticut: 1) web-based TF-CBT implementation strategy ("W"), consisting on only web-based training and consultation; versus 2) W plus live TF-CBT implementation strategy, consisting of W plus face-to face training and phone consultation with TF-CBT experts ("W+L").
Therapists in each of 18 participating RTFprograms that serve adjudicated youth are randomized to receive either: 1. W TF-CBT implementation strategy, provided via the free distance learning resources TF-CBTWeb, (www.musc/edu/tfcbt) and TF-CBTConsult (www.musc.edu/tfcbtconsult); or 2. W+L implementation strategy, provided through W + 2 day TF-CBT training plus one year of twice monthly TF-CBT consultation calls with a TF-CBT expert trainer. All RTF staff receive one day training in trauma-informed care. All therapists in both conditions receive training in screening youth for trauma exposure and symptoms. Data are collected regarding primary outcomes of: 1) number of youth therapists in each condition screen for trauma symptoms, 2) number of youth consent to TF-CBT treatment; 3) number of youth complete TF-CBT, 4) TF-CBT fidelity during treatment. Secondary outcomes include 1)changes in therapist knowledge and satisfaction regarding TF-CBT treatment and 2) youth outcomes including PTSD symptoms, depression and satisfaction with treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
210
Web TF-CBT implementation or Web + Live TF-CBT implementation
Number of youth screened for trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms
Number of youth screened for trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms using the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index (online version)in W vs. W+L implementation condition
Time frame: Day 1
Number of youth starting TF-CBT
Number of youth who begin TF-CBT treatment in W vs W+L implementation condition
Time frame: Day 60
Number of youth completing TF-CBT in each condition
Number of youth completing TF-CBT in W vs W+L conditions
Time frame: Day 240 (6 months post start of treatment)
Fidelity of TF-CBT implementation
Therapist fidelity implementing TF-CBT across and between implementation conditions using TF-CBT Fidelity Checklist (online version)
Time frame: Day 240
Therapy Procedures Checklist
Therapist comfort with cognitive therapy practices (or change in this during the study) as a predictor of other outcomes between the W vs. W+L group
Time frame: Day 1; Day 900 (30 monhts later)
Attitudes toward Computer Usage Scale
Attitudes toward computer usage as a potential covariate of outcomes
Time frame: Day 1; Day 900
TF-CBTWeb Knowledge Test
Change in knowledge related to TF-CBT as a moderator of outcomes
Time frame: Day 1, Day 900
Youth UCLA PTSD Reaction Index
Change in youth PTSD scores across and between implementation conditions to be examined as a secondary outcome
Time frame: Day 1; Day 240 (post treatment_
Mood and Feelings Questionnaire-Short Version
Change in youth depression scores in youth across and between implementation conditions
Time frame: Day 1; Day 240 (post treatment)
Youth Satisfaction Survey
Youth satisfaction with therapy across and between implementation conditions
Time frame: Day 240 (post treatment)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.