Because communication and handoff failures are a root cause of two-thirds of "sentinel events"- serious, often fatal preventable adverse events in hospitals improving handoffs has been identified by AHRQ and the Joint Commission as a priority in nationwide efforts to improve patient safety. Comparative Effectiveness Research on handoff tools and processes has identified specific strategies to improve handoffs and reduce medical errors: 1) team training; 2) verbal mnemonics; and 3) use of written/computerized tools to supplement verbal sign-outs. To accelerate residents' use of CER-based handoff practices and improve patient safety, the investigators are implementing the three inventions above as a Resident Handoff Bundle (RHB) in eight pediatric hospitals in the United States and Canada.
The I-PASS Study was initiated in response to mounting evidence that communication and handoff failures are a root cause of two-thirds of "sentinel events" - serious, often fatal, preventable adverse events in hospitals. The Agency on Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and Joint Commission have identified improving handoffs in care as a priority in nationwide efforts to improve patient safety. Research on handoff tools and processes has identified team training, introduction of verbal mnemonics, and use of written or computerized tools as strategies to improve handoffs and reduce medical errors. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of a resident handoff bundle (RHB) comprised of these three strategies in addressing medical errors, verbal and written miscommunications, and resident workflow and satisfaction. The US Department of Health and Human Services granted $3 million in funding, with additional support provided by member institutional and private foundations. A total of nine hospitals in the United States and Canada will serve as data collection sites for the study (see list below). Staggered six-month waves of baseline data collection of medical errors and resident workflow, satisfaction, and miscommunications began in January 2010. Each site has a six-month wash-in period to implement the RHB intervention before embarking upon an additional six months of post-intervention data collection. Analysis and dissemination will begin upon completion of data collection at the last wave of sites in April 2013. Study Sites: Children's Hospital Boston (Boston, MA) - Coordinating Site Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, MA) - Data Coordinating Center Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (Palo Alto, CA) UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital (San Francisco, CA) OHSU Doernbecher Children's Hospital (Portland, OR) Primary Children's Medical Center (Salt Lake City, UT) St. Louis Children's Hospital (St. Louis, MO) Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (Cincinnati, OH) Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, ON) National Capital Consortium (Washington, DC) St. Christopher's Hospital for Children (Philadelphia, PA) Study Leadership: Principal Investigator: Christopher Landrigan, MD, MPH Project Leader: Amy Starmer, MD, MPH
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
875
1\) team training, 2) verbal mnemonics, and 3) standardization of written/computerized handoff tools
Lucile Packard Children's Hospital
Palo Alto, California, United States
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital
San Francisco, California, United States
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Children's Hospital Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
St. Louis Children's Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
St. Christopher's Hospital for Children
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Primary Children's Medical Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Rates of serious medical errors
Time frame: Continuous collection during data collection phase of study (total of 12 months over an 18 month period matched by time of year (i.e., 6 months pre, 6 months wash-in with no data collection, 6 months post-intervention data collection)
Verbal and written miscommunications
Residents will be assessed for 1 month periods at a time, both before and after implementing the intervention. This information will be collected in staggered 18-month intervals across all study sites over the course of a 28 month period.
Time frame: up to 28 months
Time spent by residents gathering and signing out data
Residents will be assessed for 1 month periods at a time, both before and after implementing the intervention. This information will be collected in staggered 18-month intervals across all study sites over the course of a 28 month period.
Time frame: up to 28 months
Resident satisfaction with sign-out
Residents will be assessed for 1 month periods at a time, both before and after implementing the intervention. This information will be collected in staggered 18-month intervals across all study sites over the course of a 28 month period.
Time frame: up to 28 months
Hospital- and patient-level predictors of implementation success
analysis of all outcomes above, cross-referenced with hospital indicator codes and patient severity of illness codes
Time frame: up to 28 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.