C1-C2 is the most mobile segment of the spine and its dysfunction is frequently associated to cervical pain and headache. However, serious neurovascular adverse effects have been documented through direct treatment of C1-C2 segment. Although indirect treatment via adjacent segments and avoidance of end range of rotation and extension have been recommended for a safer and effective cervical treatment, there is no scientific evidence of the effectiveness of the indirect treatment approach in the cervical neutral position for C1-C2 hypomobility. Due to that, the investigators designed a randomized controlled trial to compare the short-term effects in the Flexion Rotation Test (FRT) of a translatoric mobilization of C0-C1, a translatoric mobilization of C7-T1 and a control group in subjects with C1-C2 hypomobility.The primary hypothesis is that C0-C1 dorsal glide mobilization applied in the neutral cervical position can recover the C1-C2 rotational range of movement in subjects with upper cervical hypomobility.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
48
César Hidalgo
Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain
Change in baseline in Range of movement in Upper Cervical Spine
Flexion-rotation test measured by CROM device
Time frame: 1 hour after intervention
Cervical range of movement in cardinal planes
Active cervical range of movement in sagittal, frontal and transversal planes measured by CROM device.
Time frame: 1 hour after intervention
Upper cervical flexion and extension range of movement
Active upper cervical flexion and extension range of movement measured with CROM device
Time frame: 1 hour after intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.