In this study, Dutch gastroenterologists who are certified for performing colonoscopies on FIT-positive patients in the Dutch population screening program are trained in optical diagnosis with validated methods. After this training, an ex- and in-vivo test phase leads to "accreditation" and endoscopists will be observed in their optical diagnosis for 1 year. During this year, half of the endoscopists will be randomized towards 3-monthly feedback and the other half will receive feedback on their results after 1 year. The endoscopic prediction of endoscopists on polyp histology will be compared to histopathological outcome.
Through the recently started nationwide bowel cancer screening programme in the Netherlands, an extra 70.000 colonoscopies are annually performed. In current practice, all resected colonic lesions are histopathologically analysed. Even diminutive polyps, which rarely harbour cancer or advanced histological features. If endoscopists are able to accurately differentiate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions during colonoscopy, practice could become more efficient and costeffective. This strategy is called optical diagnosis and two clinical practice strategies have been proposed by the American Society of Gastroenterologists (ASGE). First, diminutive polyps could be resected and discarded if \>90% of the surveillance intervals predicted on optical diagnosis correlate with the surveillance intervals after histopathological validation (if assessed with high confidence). Second, hyperplastic polyps in the rectosigmoid could be left in situ if endoscopists are able to confidently predict neoplastic histology of diminutive colorectal polyps with a negative predictive value (NPV) of ≥90%. The accuracy of white light colonoscopy is not acceptable for daily practice (59%-84%), but narrow band imaging (NBI) allows higher accuracies up to 98% and it was demonstrated that experienced endoscopists could reach a NPV of ≥90% for diminutive colorectal lesions. However, recent research shows that community gastroenterologists are not able to meet the quality thresholds proposed by the ASGE. Before this strategy could be safely applied in daily practice, community gastroenterologists should be able to meet thresholds as well. In this study, Dutch gastroenterologists who are certified for performing colonoscopies on FIT-positive patients in the Dutch population screening program, are trained in optical diagnosis with validated methods. After training, an ex- and in-vivo test phase leads to "accreditation" and endoscopists will be observed in their optical diagnosis for 1 year. During this year, half of the endoscopists will be randomized towards 3-monthly feedback and the other half will receive feedback on their results after 1 year. The endoscopic prediction of endoscopists on polyp histology will be compared to histopathological outcome.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
3,144
3-monthly or no 3-monthly feedback on results of optical diagnosis
Medisch Centrum Alkmaar
Alkmaar, Netherlands
Flevoziekenhuis
Almere Stad, Netherlands
Amstelland Ziekenhuis
Amstelveen, Netherlands
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Sint Lucas Andreas Ziekenhuis
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Slotervaart Ziekenhuis
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis
Beverwijk, Netherlands
Kennemer Gasthuis
Haarlem, Netherlands
Spaarne Ziekenhuis
Hoofddorp, Netherlands
...and 3 more locations
the number of training rounds needed until endoscopists reach a clinical acceptable accuracy of predicting histology of subcentimetric (1-9 mm) colorectal lesions using NBI
Time frame: 18 months
the number of qualified endoscopists that are able to maintain a clinical acceptable accuracy of predicting histology of subcentimetric (1-9 mm) colorectal lesions using NBI over a year, either with and without regular interim feedback.
Time frame: 18 months
the number of the accredited endoscopists that is able to reach a negative predictive value of at least 90% for predicting neoplastic diminutive (1-5mm) and small (6-9mm) colorectal lesions in the rectosigmoid
Time frame: 18 months
the number of diminutive (1-5mm) and small (6-9mm) lesions that are correctly predicted with high confidence
Time frame: 18 months
the number of patients in whom a surveillance interval (according to the Dutch surveillance guideline) can be advised directly after colonoscopy, based on the endoscopic diagnosis
Time frame: 18 months
the number of patients in whom the surveillance interval (according to the Dutch surveillance guideline) is correctly predicted based on endoscopic diagnosis
Time frame: 18 months
the number of correctly diagnosed sessile serrated adenoma/polyps in diminutive (1-5mm) and small (6-9mm) polyps
Time frame: 18 months
the sensitivity for predicting neoplastic histology per endoscopist, time frame and feedback or no feedback group
Time frame: 18 months
the costs in euros that would have been saved by multiplying the amount of high confidence predicted diminutive and small polyps with the histopathology costs per lesion
Time frame: 18 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.