This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic profile and treatment effect of a new drug known as BGB-A317 in participants with advanced tumors.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
451
In the dose escalation part, the dose levels were escalated following a modified 3+3 dose escalation scheme. In the scheduled exploration part, participants were assigned to doses and dose schedules. In the fixed dose exploration part, participants were assigned to dose group(s) not to exceed the maximum tolerated dose. In the dose expansion part, participants were assigned to different groups based on their tumor type.
Participants were assigned to different groups based on their tumor types
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Phase 1A: Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE could have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of an investigational product. All AEs were monitored per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE version \[v\] 4.03 2010).
Time frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1A: Number Of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Values
A complete physical examination, vital signs (systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse rate, temperature, and respiratory rate), and weight were performed pre-specified time points for Phase 1A. During the treatment period, symptom-directed physical examinations were performed. If there were no complaints and no abnormal findings from the previous visit for a particular organ system, a physical examination of that organ system was not required.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 15 of each cycle through 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Phase 1A: Number Of Participants Experiencing Dose-dependent Toxicity Through Ophthalmology Findings
Ophthalmological examinations (such as eyesight/visual acuity, fundoscopy, slit lamp microscopy, and optical coherence tomography \[or equivalent diagnostic test\]) were performed at pre-specified time points for Phase 1A. Eye exam, visual acuity test, and optical coherence tomography (or equivalent diagnostic test) will be assessed by an appropriate specialist at Screening. Participants dosed underwent subsequent ophthalmologic examinations, a specified in the protocol, by an appropriate specialist during study treatment.
Time frame: Day 15 of cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2 and all additional cycles, and 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Phase 1A: Number Of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Oncology Consultants, P.A.
Houston, Texas, United States
Chris O'Brien Lifehouse
Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
Prince of Wales Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Tasman Oncology Research Ltd
Southport, Queensland, Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Woodville South, South Australia, Australia
Monash Health
Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
...and 17 more locations
Electrocardiograms were obtained at pre-specified time points. Significant QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) prolongation was defined as an interval ≥ 500 milliseconds (msec) or an interval which increases by ≥ 60 msec over baseline.
Time frame: Days 1 and 15 of cycle 1; Day 1 of cycle 2 and all additional cycles; Day 1 of cycle 4; 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Phase 1A: Number Of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values
Clinical chemistry, hematology, coagulation, and urinalysis were performed at pre-specified time points for Phase 1A. If warranted, additional testing was done, or the relevant tests done more frequently in accordance with institutional guidelines. All participants who had any Grade 3 or Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities at withdrawal from the study were followed up until they had returned to Grade 1 or Grade 2, unless these were not likely to improve due to the underlying disease. Participants experiencing decreases (low) and increases (high) to ≥ Grade 3 are reported.
Time frame: Day -28 (predose), Days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1; Days 1 and 15 of cycle 2 and additional cycles; Days 1 and 15 of cycle 4; 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Phase 1A: Number Of Participants Experiencing Severe AEs
All AEs were monitored per the NCI-CTCAE (v 4.03 2010). In addition to performing the CTCAE assessment, the intensity of each AE and serious adverse event (SAE) recorded was assigned to one of the following categories based on the Investigator's clinical judgment: Mild: an event that is easily tolerated by the participant, causing minimal discomfort and not interfering with everyday activities; moderate: An event that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal everyday activities; severe: An event that prevents normal everyday activities. Severity was a category utilized for rating the intensity of an event and, accordingly, both AEs and SAEs could be assessed as severe.
Time frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
The ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in the study whose best overall response was either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by investigators based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v 1.1.
Time frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1A: Area Under The Plasma Concentration-time Curve Within the Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau) For Tislelizumab
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1-1 hour pre-dose, End of infusion, 1, 5, 6, 24, and 72 hours post-dose; Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-dose
Phase 1A: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) For Tislelizumab
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1-1 hour pre-dose, End of infusion, 1, 5, 6, 24, and 72 hours post-dose; Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-dose
Phase 1A: Time To Maximum Concentration (Tmax) For Tislelizumab
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1-1 hour pre-dose, End of infusion, 1, 5, 6, 24, and 72 hours post-dose; Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-dose
Phase 1A: Half-life (T½) For Tislelizumab
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1-1 hour pre-dose, End of infusion, 1, 5, 6, 24, and 72 hours post-dose; Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-dose
Phase 1A - Part 3: Clearance (Cl) For Tislelizumab
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1-1 hour pre-dose, End of infusion, 1, 5, 6, 24, and 72 hours post-dose; Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-dose
Phase 1A/1B: Number Of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)
Immunogenicity was summarized by the number and percentage of participants who developed detectable treatment-emergent ADAs, which included positive ADAs and neutralizing antibodies (NAb).
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycles 1 through 15
Phase 1A: ORR
The ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in the study whose best overall response was either CR or PR as assessed by investigators based on RECIST v 1.1.
Time frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1A: CR Rate
The CR rate was based on RECIST v 1.1 and the results of Investigator evaluations.
Time frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1A: PR Rate
The PR rate was based on RECIST v 1.1 and the results of Investigator evaluations.
Time frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1A: Stable Disease (SD) Rate
The SD rate was based on RECIST v 1.1 and the results of Investigator evaluations.
Time frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1A: Progression-free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from the date of first study dose to disease progression or death whichever occurs first. Participants without an event (no disease progression or death) were censored at the date of "last tumor assessment". Participants with no baseline or post-baseline tumor assessments were censored at Day 1. PFS was based on RECIST v 1.1 and the results of Investigator evaluations.
Time frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1A: Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time interval between the date of the first study drug dose to the date of death for any cause. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate OS at various time points. The OS was based on RECIST v 1.1 and the results of Investigator evaluations.
Time frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1A: Duration Of Response (DOR)
DOR for responders (CR or PR) was defined as the time interval between the date of the earliest qualifying response and the date of progressive disease or death for any cause, whichever occurred earlier. For participants who were alive without progression following the qualifying response, DOR was censored on the date of last evaluable tumor assessment or last follow-up for progression of disease. The DOR was based on RECIST v 1.1 and the results of Investigator evaluations.
Time frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Number of Participants Experiencing AEs
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE could have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of an investigational product. All AEs were monitored per the NCI-CTCAE (v 4.03 2010).
Time frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Steady State Plasma Trough Concentration Of Tislelizumab
Time frame: Pre-dose, Day 1 Cycle 5 and every other Cycle in the first 6 months, every 4 cycles in the next 6 months, once every 6 months up to end of treatment (up to 5 years and 2 months)
Phase 1B: PFS
PFS was defined as the time from the date of first study dose to disease progression or death whichever occurs first. Participants without an event (no disease progression or death) were censored at the date of "last tumor assessment". Participants with no baseline or post-baseline tumor assessments were censored at Day 1. PFS was based on RECIST v 1.1 and the results of Investigator evaluations.
Time frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Disease Control Rate (DCR)
The DCR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieve CR, PR, and SD based on RECIST v 1.1 in participants with select tumor types.
Time frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
The CBR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR, PR, and durable SD \[SD ≥24 weeks\] based on RECIST v 1.1 in participants with select tumor types.
Time frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Number Of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Values
A complete physical examination, vital signs (SBP, DBP, pulse rate, temperature, and respiratory rate), and weight were performed pre-specified time points for Phase 1B. During the treatment period, symptom-directed physical examinations were performed. If there were no complaints and no abnormal findings from the previous visit for a particular organ system, a physical examination of that organ system was not required.
Time frame: Day -28 (predose), Days 1, 4, 8, and 15 of cycle 1; Day 1 of cycle 2; through 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose up to 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Number Of Participants Experiencing Dose-dependent Toxicity Through Ophthalmology Findings
Ophthalmological examinations (such as eyesight/visual acuity, fundoscopy, slit lamp microscopy, and optical coherence tomography \[or equivalent diagnostic test\]) were performed at pre-specified time points for Phase 1B. Eye exam, visual acuity test, and optical coherence tomography (or equivalent diagnostic test) will be assessed by an appropriate specialist at Screening. Participants dosed underwent subsequent ophthalmologic examinations, a specified in the protocol, by an appropriate specialist during study treatment.
Time frame: Day -28 (predose), Day 1 of cycle 2 and additional cycles, and 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose up to 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Number Of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms
Electrocardiograms were obtained at pre-specified time points. Significant QTc prolongation was defined as an interval ≥ 500 msec or an interval which increases by ≥ 60 msec over baseline.
Time frame: Day -28 (predose), Days 1 and 15 of cycle 1; Day 1 of cycle 2 and additional cycles; 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose up to 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Number Of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values
Clinical chemistry, hematology, coagulation, and urinalysis will be performed at pre-specified time points for Phase 1A and Phase 1B respectively. If warranted, additional testing was done, or the relevant tests done more frequently in accordance with institutional guidelines. All participants who had any Grade 3 or Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities at withdrawal from the study were followed up until they had returned to Grade 1 or Grade 2, unless these were not likely to improve due to the underlying disease. Participants experiencing decreases (low) and increases (high) to ≥ Grade 3 are reported.
Time frame: Day -28 (predose), Days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1; Day 1 of cycle 2 and additional cycles; 30 (+/- 7) days after last dose up to 5 years and 2 months
Phase 1B: Number Of Participants Experiencing Severe AEs
All AEs were monitored per the NCI-CTCAE (v 4.03 2010). In addition to performing the CTCAE assessment, the intensity of each AE and SAE recorded was assigned to one of the following categories based on the Investigator's clinical judgment: Mild: an event that is easily tolerated by the participant, causing minimal discomfort and not interfering with everyday activities; moderate: An event that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal everyday activities; severe: An event that prevents normal everyday activities. Severity was a category utilized for rating the intensity of an event and, accordingly, both AEs and SAEs could be assessed as severe.
Time frame: Day -28 through 5 years and 2 months