This study was done to evaluate the effect of HIV and TB treatment on a commonly used birth control method. It enrolled women who were infected with HIV and TB and were taking efavirenz (EFV; Sustiva®; an anti-HIV medication), rifampicin (RIF; an anti-TB medication), and isoniazid (INH; an anti-TB medication). The purpose of this study was to find out the best frequency to give depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA; a hormonal birth control method that is given as a shot every 3 months) in these women. This study also tried to find out if a 150 mg injection of DMPA was effective in preventing ovulation, the process by which the ovaries (the ovaries are part of the female reproductive system) release an egg for fertilization, for 12 weeks in women who are taking EFV and RIF. Another purpose of this study was to find out if it is safe to take RIF, EFV and DMPA at the same time.
Globally, women comprise 52% of all people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Decisions about contraception in a population of women infected with both tuberculosis (TB) and HIV are of paramount importance. In the setting of the treatment of active TB, preventing pregnancy becomes even more important because it allows women to attain a level of health that will support healthy future pregnancies. Treatment options for TB may be limited in pregnancy because of concerns about teratogenicity. Millions of women around the world use depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA, trade name Depo-Provera) for prevention of pregnancy. DMPA is an intermediate-acting progesterone-only injectable contraceptive with a high efficacy rate. Unfortunately, DMPA's safety and effectiveness among women co-infected with TB and HIV is unknown since the interactions of TB treatment, combination ART (cART), and DMPA have not been well studied. The results of this study are likely to be applicable to women receiving RIF-containing TB treatment who are not being treated concurrently with EFV as well, given that addition of EFV to RIF is unlikely to increase induction of metabolizing enzymes significantly beyond the induction achieved with RIF alone. The study population included premenopausal women, 18 to 46 years of age, who were co-infected with HIV and TB. To be eligible to enroll in the study, participants must have been on EFV 600 mg once daily plus two or more nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) for at least 28 days prior to study entry with no plans to change therapy for the 12 weeks of the study. Women must have been on the continuation phase of active TB treatment (with a minimum of 12 weeks remaining) taking RIF 8-12 mg/kg orally and INH 4-6 mg/kg orally on a 5-day or more per week schedule (or as directed by national guidelines for TB treatment). At study entry/week 0, DMPA 150 mg was administered intramuscularly as a single dose. Study duration was 12 weeks. Visits occurred at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. The key evaluations included physical examination, clinical assessments, hematology, chemistry, HIV RNA, pregnancy testing, plasma progesterone levels, and plasma DMPA concentration levels. The sample size was 46 participants, of which 42 had to be evaluable. Participants who missed two successive visits prior to week 8 and those who did not complete the week 10 and week 12 clinic visits with available DMPA concentrations and progesterone levels were not evaluable and replaced in the sample size. The final number of participants enrolled was 62 participants, with only 42 evaluable.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
62
Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate intramuscular injection
Gaborone Prevention/Treatment Trials CRS (12701)
Gaborone, Botswana
Kenya Medical Research Institute/Center for Disease Control (KEMRI/CDC) CRS (31460)
Kisumu, Kenya
Durban Adult HIV CRS (11201)
Durban, South Africa
Univ. of Witwatersrand CRS (11101)
Johannesburg, South Africa
UZ-Parirenyatwa CRS (30313)
Harare, Zimbabwe
Percent of Participants With DMPA Concentrations Below 0.1 ng/mL at Week 12
The percent of participants with plasma DMPA concentrations below 0.1 ng/mL was calculated with an exact Clopper-Pearson 95% confidence interval. Suppression of ovulation generally occurs as long as the DMPA level is =\> 0.1 ng/mL.
Time frame: Week 12
Percent of Participants With Progesterone Levels Above 1 ng/mL at Week 12
The percent of participants with plasma progesterone levels above 1 ng/mL was calculated with an exact Clopper-Pearson 95% confidence interval. Ovulation generally occurs when the progesterone level is \> 5 ng/mL. If there were participants with plasma progesterone levels \> 1 ng/mL, then the percent of participants with plasma progesterone levels \> 5 ng/mL would have been calculated by study week.
Time frame: Week 12
Percent of Participants With DMPA Concentrations Below 0.1 ng/mL at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10
The percents of participants with plasma DMPA concentrations below 0.1 ng/mL at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 were calculated with exact Clopper-Pearson 95% confidence intervals. Suppression of ovulation generally occurs as long as the DMPA level is =\> 0.1 ng/mL.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10
Cumulative Percentage of Participants With DMPA < 0.1 ng/mL
The cumulative percentage of participants having a DMPA concentration less than 0.1 ng/mL at week 12 was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier estimator with an associated standard error. The confidence interval was calculated using a log-log transformation. Suppression of ovulation generally occurs as long as the DMPA level is =\> 0.1 ng/mL.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
DMPA AUC
Describe the DMPA plasma area under the curve (AUC) between 0 and 12 weeks, where AUC(0-12wks) was calculated using non-compartmental methods.The Week 0 time point was drawn prior to DMPA injection.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
DMPA Cmin
Describe the DMPA minimum observed concentration (Cmin) between 0 and 12 weeks. The Week 0 time point was drawn prior to DMPA injection.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
DMPA Cmax
Describe the DMPA maximum observed concentration (Cmax) between 0 and 12 weeks. The Week 0 time point was drawn prior to DMPA injection.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
DMPA CL/F
Describe the apparent DMPA clearance (CL/F) between 0 and 12 weeks. The Week 0 time point was drawn prior to DMPA injection.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Percent of Participants Who Experienced a Grade 3 or Higher Sign/Symptom or Laboratory Abnormality
The percent of participants who experienced a grade 3 (severe) or higher sign/symptom or laboratory abnormality were calculated with an exact Clopper-Pearson 95% confidence interval. Events were graded (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=life-threatening, 5=death) according to the DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1.0).
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
DMPA Half-life
Describe the terminal elimination half-life of DMPA (t½) between 0 and 12 weeks, where t½ was calculated using nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) modelling. The Week 0 time point was drawn prior to DMPA injection.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Time at Which Participant-specific Estimated Elimination Slopes for DMPA Level Cross the Threshold of 0.1 ng/mL
Describe the time at which DMPA levels drop below the threshold of 0.1 ng/mL, based on participant-specific estimated elimination slopes from nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) models. The Week 0 time point was drawn prior to DMPA injection.
Time frame: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.