The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) restored with two self-etching adhesive systems applied with or without selective enamel etching.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) restored with two self-etching adhesive systems: Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray Noritake, Japan) and Xeno V + (Dentsply De Trey, Germany) applied with or without 36% phosphoric acid enamel etching. Assessments were at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of clinical service.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
25
Etch: selective 36% phosphoric acid enamel etching
Non-etch: without phosphoric acid selective enamel etching
Restoration retention rate as measured by modified U.S. Public Health Service evaluation criteria at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Restoration marginal integrity as measured by modified U.S. Public Health Service evaluation criteria at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Restoration marginal staining as measured by modified U.S. Public Health Service evaluation criteria at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Secondary caries as measured by modified U.S. Public Health Service evaluation criteria at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Post-operative sensitivity as measured by modified U.S. Public Health Service evaluation criteria at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Pulp vitality as measured by modified U.S. Public Health Service evaluation criteria at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.