In immunocompromised patients, Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF) is associated with a high case-fatality, particularly when invasive Mechanical Ventilation (MV) is required. In the most hypoxemic patients, oxygen administration through High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) has been reported as an alternative to the venturi mask. The aim of this study is to compare HFNC and venturi mask on early respiratory deterioration and patient's comfort in that setting. The investigators planned a prospective randomized study in 4 Intensive Care Units (ICUs). As respiratory deterioration occurs early after ICU admission, patients are randomized to receive two hours of oxygen therapy either through HFNC or venturi mask. The primary endpoint is defined as the need for invasive or noninvasive MV in the 2-hour period. Secondary endpoints include comfort, dyspnea and thirst.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
Oxygenation failure
Oxygenation failure is defined with the need of invasive Mechanical Ventilation or Non invasive ventilation during the two hours study period
Time frame: 2 hours
comfort (0-10 Visual analog Scale)
0-10 Visual analog Scale
Time frame: 1 hour
comfort (0-10 Visual analog Scale)
0-10 Visual analog Scale
Time frame: 2 hours
dyspnea (0-10 Visual analog Scale)
0-10 Visual analog Scale
Time frame: 1 hour
dyspnea (0-10 Visual analog Scale)
0-10 Visual analog Scale
Time frame: 2 hour
thirst (0-10 Visual analog Scale)
0-10 Visual analog Scale
Time frame: 1 hour
thirst (0-10 Visual analog Scale)
0-10 Visual analog Scale
Time frame: 2 hour
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.