The overarching goal of the project is to improve the process and experience of surrogate decision-making by family caregivers. Since feeling unprepared to make surrogate decisions is a major contributor to caregiver stress, the primary outcome is caregiver self-efficacy --i.e., caregivers' assessment of how well prepared they feel to serve effectively as a surrogate decision-maker. Through follow-on Renewal funding, we are now also qualitatively examining family caregivers' experience with surrogate decision-making.
The long-term goal is to help family caregivers of seriously ill patients be better prepared to serve as surrogate decision-makers when their loved ones can no longer make medical decisions for themselves. Research shows that family caregivers find surrogate decision-making highly stressful and emotionally burdensome, in part because they feel unprepared for surrogate decision-making. To date, no studies have determined which advance care planning (ACP) process best prepares caregivers for this role. The investigators' prior work shows that a computer-based decision aid can help patients make more informed decisions and communicate their wishes more effectively. The investigators now propose to determine if family caregivers of patients with life-threatening illnesses are better prepared for surrogate decision-making: 1) when they engage in a structured ACP process together with patients; and 2) when they use this online decision aid for ACP. This will be accomplished via a randomized, controlled trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design comprising 4 groups: Standard ACP/Patient Alone (Group 1), Decision Aid/Patient Alone (Group 2), Standard ACP/Patients and Caregivers Together (Group 3), and Decision Aid/Patients and Caregivers Together (Group 4).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
285
Making Your Wishes Known provides tailored education, values clarification exercises, and a sophisticated decision aid that translates an individual's goals and preferences into a specific medical plan that can be implemented by a healthcare team.
This is a online simple living will form.
Brigham & Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center / Penn State College of Medicine
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Self-efficacy
Family caregiver self-efficacy is measured using a validated questionnaire to determine if they feel better prepared to serve as surrogates for their loved one.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Accuracy of medical decisions
Family caregiver responses to treatment decisions hypothetical clinical vignettes will be compared to the decisions for the same vignettes made by their loved one. Each vignette has 6-8 associated treatment decisions; the family caregiver's response for each item will be compared with the loved one's (i.e., patient's) response, and a total concordance (i.e., number of items for which there is agreement) will be calculated.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Family caregivers' stress associated with actual (i.e., real-life) surrogate decision-making
Using validated instruments and semi-structured interviews, family caregivers who have made a major medical decision on behalf of their loved one will report their level of distress, decisional conflict, satisfaction with decision, and experience with surrogate decision-making.
Time frame: 1-2 years
Family caregiver knowledge
Family caregivers will complete a questionnaire that assess their knowledge of surrogate responsibilities and end-of-life medical conditions and treatments
Time frame: 6 weeks - 2 years
Depth of communication
Family Caregivers are interviewed about the depth of communication with their loved one (frequency, content, helpfulness of discussions) regarding advance care planning issues.
Time frame: 2 years
Satisfaction with advance care planning
Participants who complete the advance care planning interventions fill out an evaluation of the intervention using a 16-item questionnaire. This instrument comprises: Twelve 5-point Likert-style questions on how the program presented various kinds of information; helped the user clarify values, choose a spokesperson, etc.; and helped the user document or be prepared communicate their wishes to others. Three 10-point Likert-style questions on user overall satisfaction, with the advance directive created by the intervention, and the amount of information provided. One open-ended item asking how the intervention was helpful.
Time frame: 1st study visit
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.