A Safety and Efficacy Study of JNJ-42165279 in Participants With Social Anxiety Disorder

Janssen Research & Development, LLC150 enrolled

Overview

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of JNJ-42165279 during 12 weeks of treatment in participants with Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD).

This is a Phase 2a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the Investigator nor the participants know about the study intervention), placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study of JNJ-42165279 in participants with social anxiety disorder. Participants will receive 25 milligram (mg) JNJ-42165279 or matching placebo orally once-daily from Day 1 up to 12 weeks. Participants will primarily be assessed for the change from baseline in Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) at Week 12. Safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE

Enrollment

150

Conditions

Phobic Disorders

Interventions

JNJ-42165279DRUG

Participants will receive 25 milligram (mg) JNJ-42165279 orally once-daily from Day 1 up to 12 weeks.

PlaceboDRUG

Participants will receive a matching placebo orally once-daily from Day 1 up to 12 weeks.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 64 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Must have a primary DSM-5 diagnosis of Social anxiety disorder (SAD) except those with performance only as a specifier. Participants with a diagnosis of comorbid Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) or Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) may be included if the Investigator considers SAD to be the predominant diagnosis. Participants with current or lifetime history of Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and specific phobia may be included as well * Must have a Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale score greater than or equal (\>=) 70 at Screening and Baseline * Participants with a current episode of MDD must have a HDRS17 total score less than or equal to (\<=) 18 * Must have a body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 35 kilogram per meter square (kg/m\^2), inclusive, at screening * Female participants must be either postmenopausal or surgically sterile Exclusion Criteria: * Participants who have performance only SAD are excluded. Participants with other current significant psychiatric condition(s) (Axis 1 under DSM-IV), including, but not limited to, MDD with psychotic features (lifetime), bipolar disorder (including lifetime diagnosis), obsessive-compulsive disorder, borderline personality disorder, eating disorder (e.g., bulimia, anorexia nervosa), autism spectrum disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or schizophrenia are excluded. Participants with a diagnosis of comorbid GAD or MDD may be included * Participants is currently receiving specific psychotherapy for SAD * Has a history of more than two unsuccessful adequate pharmacological treatment trials for SAD, defined as lack of response to at least 10 weeks of treatment at adequate doses (e.g., paroxetine \>= 40 milligram per day (mg/day) or its equivalent; or clonazepam \>= 2.5 mg/day or its equivalent) * Concurrent use of psychotropic medications * has a history of or current thyroid disease, thyroid dysfunction and is currently untreated for it

Locations (21)

Unnamed facility

La Jolla, California, United States

Unnamed facility

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Unnamed facility

Orlando, Florida, United States

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) Total Score

The LSAS is a 24-item, semi-structured interview on the severity of Social Anxiety Disorder. The LSAS separately assesses fear and avoidance of 24 social situations. The scale is divided into 2 subscales, 13 situations concerning performance anxiety, and 11 situations pertaining to social situations. The 24 items are first rated on a Likert Scale from 0 to 3 on fear felt during the situations (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3= severe), and then the same items are rated regarding avoidance of the situation (0=never, 1=occasionally, 2=often, 3=usually) with higher scores indicating greater social anxiety. The LSAS fear/anxiety and avoidance subscale was calculated by summing the 24 fear/anxiety and avoidance item scores of the LSAS, and ranges from 0 to 72. Combining the total scores for the Fear and Avoidance sections provides an overall score with a maximum of 144 points and a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores indicated higher probability of social anxiety disorder (SAD).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Secondary Outcomes

Change From Baseline in LSAS Fear/Anxiety and Avoidance Subscales

The LSAS is a 24-item, semi-structured interview on the severity of Social Anxiety Disorder. The LSAS separately assesses fear and avoidance of 24 social situations. The scale is divided into 2 subscales, 13 situations concerning performance anxiety, and 11 situations pertaining to social situations. The 24 items are first rated on a Likert Scale from 0 to 3 on fear felt during the situations (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3= severe), and then the same items are rated regarding avoidance of the situation (0=never, 1=occasionally, 2=often, 3=usually). Combining the total scores for the Fear and Avoidance sections provides an overall score with a maximum of 144 points and a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores indicated higher probability of SAD. The LSAS fear/anxiety and avoidance subscale was calculated by summing the 24 fear/anxiety and avoidance item scores of the LSAS, and ranges from 0 to 72.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline (Responders) on LSAS Total Score

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.

Unnamed facility

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Unnamed facility

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Unnamed facility

Natick, Massachusetts, United States

Unnamed facility

New York, New York, United States

Unnamed facility

Rochester, New York, United States

Unnamed facility

Staten Island, New York, United States

Unnamed facility

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

...and 11 more locations

Responders are participants with \>= 50% improvement from baseline. The LSAS scale consists of 24 items which are divided into 2 subscales that address social interactional (11 items) and performance (13 items) situations. The 24 items are first rated on a Likert Scale from 0 to 3 on fear felt during the situations (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3= severe), and then the same items are rated regarding avoidance of the situation (0=never, 1=occasionally, 2=often, 3=usually) with higher scores indicating greater social anxiety. The LSAS fear and avoidance subscale was calculated by summing the 24 fear/anxiety and avoidance item scores of the LSAS, and ranges from 0 to 72. Combining the total scores for the Fear and Avoidance sections provides an overall score with a maximum of 144 points and a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores indicated higher probability of SAD.

Percentage of Participants With >=30% Improvement From Baseline (Remitters) on LSAS Total Score

Remitters are participants with \>= 30% improvement from baseline on LSAS total score. The LSAS scale consists of 24 items which are divided into 2 subscales that address social interactional (11 items) and performance (13 items) situations. The 24 items are first rated on a Likert Scale from 0 to 3 on fear felt during the situations (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3= severe), and then the same items are rated regarding avoidance of the situation (0=never, 1=occasionally, 2=often, 3=usually) with higher scores indicating greater social anxiety. The LSAS fear and avoidance subscale was calculated by summing the 24 fear/anxiety and avoidance item scores of the LSAS, and ranges from 0 to 72. Combining the total scores for the Fear and Avoidance sections provides an overall score with a maximum of 144 points and a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores indicated higher probability of SAD.

Time frame: Week 12

Change From Baseline in Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (SIGH-A) Total Score

The SIGH-A was included to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety, including participants with comorbid generalized anxiety disorders (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD), and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4. Higher scores indicated higher severity (0-absent, 1-mild, 2-moderate, 3-severe, 4-incapacitating). The SIGH-A total score was calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicated worse results.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM)-A6 Score

The HAM-A6 is a 6-item subscale derived from the original Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A). It comprises of five psychic anxiety symptoms: anxious mood, psychic tension, fears, intellectual disturbances, and anxious behavior observed at the interview, as well as one somatic item, muscular tension. Each of the 6 items is rated by the clinician on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (maximum degree). The HAM-A6 score was calculated by summing the 6 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater severity of symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)-17 Total Score

The HDRS-17 is a clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess the severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression with a score range of 0 to 52. Each of the 17 items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding the scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as the total score, a higher score represents a more severe condition.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Change From Baseline in HDRS17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor Total Score

The HDRS17 anxiety/somatization factor derived from Cleary and Guy's factor analysis of the HDRS17 scale, includes six items from the original 17-item version: the items for psychic anxiety, somatic anxiety, gastrointestinal somatic symptoms, general somatic symptoms, hypochondriasis, and insight. Each of these items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). HDRS17 anxiety/somatization factor total score was calculated as the sum of the 6 item scores ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicated greater severity of symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score

A 6-item subscale from the HDRS17 (HAM-D6) was analyzed as it had been shown to be a uni-dimensional scale that provided information to core depressive symptoms and was sensitive to treatment response. The six items were: depressed mood, guilt feelings, work and interests, psychomotor retardation, psychic anxiety, and general somatics (tiredness and pains). Each of these items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). General somatics is scored 0 to 2 and all others are scored 0 to 4. The HAM-D6 total score was calculated by summing the 6 items scores, and ranges from 0 to 22. Higher scores indicated greater severity of core symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I) Score

The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. The CGI-I is rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. Percentage of participants with change from baseline (very much improved or much improved and Worsening or no change) in CGI-I score were reported.

Time frame: Week 12

Percentage of Participants With >=50% Improvement From Baseline (Responders) in SIGH-A Total Score

Responders are participants with \>= 50% improvement from baseline in SIGH-A total score. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4. Higher scores indicated higher severity (0-absent, 1-mild, 2-moderate, 3 severe, 4-incapacitating). The SIGH-A total score was calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicated worse results.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12