The aim of the study is to investigate the tolerability (how severe the side effects are) and the efficacy (how well the treatment works) when nivolumab is added to the current standard treatment (chemotherapy and radiotherapy) given to patients with advanced NSCLC.
Over the past decade, concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy has become the first choice treatment for most patients with stage III non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). However, only about 30% of patients are alive 5 years after con¬comitant therapy. These figures remain approximately the same with the addition of surgery. After chemo-radiotherapy, at least 30-40% of the patients show local tumour progression on CT scans as first site of relapse. Also after surgery, about 30% of patients fail locally as a first site of recurrence. In addition, more than half of the patients eventually develop distant metastases that may have been present but undetected at the time of staging or that may have come from persistent or recurring local disease. It is thus obvious that new approaches that preferentially tackle both local and distant disease sites are needed to improve long-term survival and cure rates. Attempts to improve the long-term survival include radiotherapy dose escalation/acceleration, new chemotherapy combinations, and adding biological agents and cancer vaccines to standard regimens. At present, none of these have demonstrated an improved outcome. Improved understanding of the immune profile of NSCLC has led to immunotherapeutic strategies, including inhibitory molecules responsible for abrogating an anti-cancer immune response such as PD-1 and CTLA-4. Nivolumab, an investigational monoclonal antibody that inhibits the immune checkpoint receptor PD-1 expressed on activated T cells, has demonstrated positive results in several trials in previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC. However, rare cases of severe or fatal pneumonitis have been reported throughout clinical trials using anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 compounds. Pre-clinical data consistently show a clear beneficial effect by combining local radiotherapy and anti-PD-1. Not only was the local tumour control increased, but an "abscopal" effect on distant metastases could be observed. Radiotherapy clearly acted as an "in situ" tumour vaccination resulting in the induction of specific anti-tumour immunity in all sites of the body that could result in a clinical anti-tumour effect because of the combination with anti-PD-1. In these models, the concurrent administration of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies was more efficient to provoke an anti-tumour immune response than the sequential approach. While the role of immunotherapy is currently being evaluated as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitors in all lines of treatment of advanced NSCLC, as monotherapy in early NSCLC adjuvant setting as well as monotherapy in consolidation after completion of definitive chemo-radiotherapy, it has not yet been assessed in combination with radiotherapy. Anecdotal data of concurrent treatment in the palliative setting suggest acceptable safety and a good tolerability of such combination. The NICOLAS trial was initially developed to prospectively assess the safety of checkpoint inhibition concurrently with chemo-radiotherapy. In summary, there is a definite unmet need in multi-disciplinary care to improve the prognosis of patients diagnosed with stage III NSCLC, with a strong rationale supporting the combination of chemo-radiotherapy with anti-PD-1. A major theoretical concern is the development of pneumonitis, a rare toxicity of both radiotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors. The main aim of the ongoing current trial is therefore to evaluate the pneumonitis rate in patients being treated with chemo-radiotherapy in combination with nivolumab treatment. Rationale for protocol amendment 2: Since the NICOLAS trial was initiated, the landscape of combining chemo-radiotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibition, such as anti-PD-1 antibodies, has changed rapidly, opening a new window of opportunity. There is a very strong interest of the multidisciplinary lung cancer community to investigate the optimal integration of anti-PD-1 treatment into chemo-radiotherapy. Currently, 11 sites from 5 countries are activated for the NICOLAS trial and recruiting strongly (ahead of schedule). Using this momentum will allow us to rapidly recruit additional patients in order to reach the power to not only determine the feasibility in terms of pneumonitis grade 2 and abouve, but also to evaluate the efficacy of the concurrent treatment. So far, during the regular safety review, the ETOP IDMC did not observe any additional toxicity compared the chemo-radiotherapy alone. A first planned analysis of the PACIFIC trial (stage III NSCLC treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy, followed by the anti-PD-L1 durvalumab or observation, NCT02125461) showed an increased progression-free survival (PFS), which was co-primary endpoint together with overall survival (OS). The full details are not known, yet, but it appears that the pre-clinical rationales of combined chemo-radiotherapy and anti-PD-1 treatment can be successfully transferred into clinical trials, without serious toxicities. A recent secondary analysis of the Keynote 001 trial indicates synergistic affects of radiotherapy and immunotherapy. This international, multicentre phase I trial assessed the effect of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with progressive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients were assigned to multiple expansion cohorts to allow for the inclusion of patients who were naïve to systemic therapy and those who had progression after one or two previous regimens. The results from this study showed that the effect of pembrolizumab was significantly higher in patients who received previous radiotherapy than in patients without previous radiotherapy. These findings were well in line with pre-clinical studies that underlined the ability of radiotherapy to enhance antitumour immune response. In the absence of of serious pulmonary toxicity, the apperant benefit of chemo-radiotherapy and anti-PD-1 and the high interest of the NICOLAS study group, we propose to amend the NICOLAS trial protocol to expand on the number of patients in order to reach sufficient power for an efficacy readout (progression-free survival).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
94
Nivolumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets the programmed death-1 (PD-1) cell surface membrane receptor. PD-1 is a negative regulatory molecule expressed by activated T and B lymphocytes.Binding of PD-1 to its ligands, 1 (PD-L1) and 2 (PD-L2), results in the down-regulation of lymphocyte activation. Nivolumab inhibits the interaction of programmed cell death Protein 1 (PD-1)with its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, resulting in enhanced T-cell proliferation.
University Hospital Leuven
Leuven, Belgium
Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich
Munich, Germany
VUMC
Amsterdam, Netherlands
MAASTRO Clinic
Maastricht, Netherlands
Grade ≥3 Pneumonitis (CTCAE v4.0) up to 6 Months Post-radiotherapy
It is defined as the number of patients reaching up to 6 months post-radiotherapy without any episode of CTCAE v4.0 grade ≥3 pneumonitis. It will be used as the primary endpoint for all patients followed for at least 6 months beyond radiotherapy.
Time frame: Time from enrolment until 6 months post-radiotherapy
Progression-free Survival by RECIST v1.1 (PFS)
PFS, κey secondary endpoint, is defined as the time from the date of enrolment until first documented progression or death, if progression is not documented. For patients without a PFS event, censoring occurs at the last tumour assessment. Database cutoff: 18 September 2019
Time frame: From the date of enrolment of the first patient up to 3 years, which is also 1 year after the enrolment of the last patient (i.e., from September 2016 to September 2019)
(Grade ≥3) Pneumonitis-free Rate
Rate of TFP3, evaluated at 1-year based on Kaplan-Meier method, where TFP3 is defined as the time from the date of enrolment until first documented pneumonitis of grade ≥3.
Time frame: From the date of enrolment of the first patient up to 3 years, which is also 1 year after the enrolment of the last patient (i.e., from September 2016 to September 2019)
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Objective response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of patients with objective response (OR). OR was determined using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). OR is defined as the best overall response (Complete Response (disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; no new lesions) or Partial Response (≥decrease in the sum of the largest diameters of target lesions; no new lesions)) across all assessment points from enrollment to termination of trial treatment. Radiological tumour assessment was performed using CT scans.
Time frame: From the date of enrolment of the first patient up to 3 years, which is also 1 year after the enrolment of the last patient (i.e., from September 2016 to September 2019)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Vall d'Hebron University Hospital
Barcelona, Spain
Catalan Institute of Oncology
Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Virgen de la Salud
Toledo, Spain
HFR Fribourg- Hôpital cantonal
Fribourg, Switzerland
Kantonsspital Winterthur
Winterthur, Switzerland
Hirslanden Klinik Zürich
Zurich, Switzerland
...and 1 more locations
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF).
Time to treatment failure (TTF) is defined as time from enrolment to discontinuation of trial treatment for any reason. Disease progression, treatment toxicity, death, withdrawal and lost to follow-up which occurred after treatment completion are viewed as events.
Time frame: From the date of enrolment of the first patient up to 3 years, which is also 1 year after the enrolment of the last patient (i.e., from September 2016 to September 2019)
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time from the date of enrolment until death from any cause. The patients without OS event (death) were censored at their last follow-up date
Time frame: From the date of enrolment of the first patient up to 4 years (i.e., from September 2016 to September 2020).