Laryngeal dysfunction is a problem that affects many patients after laryngeal cancer therapy (surgery or radio/chemotherapy). Laryngeal dysfunction is associated with higher incidences of aspiration and respiratory tract complications such as aspiration pneumonia. Current standard of care treatment to reduce the consequences of aspiration is often a tracheostomy which has its own risks and complications. The proposed study aims to describe the performance of a new CE marked medical implant, the NewBreez, in protecting the patient's airways from aspiration.
Aspiration is associated with respiratory tract infections, reduced quality of life and increased mortality in patients. For chronic or unresolved aspiration, patients are often given a tracheostomy for safer breathing and greater protection of the airways from aspirated material. However tracheostomies are associated with risks and complications and do not give a 100% guarantee of aspiration protection to the patient. They also impact the quality of life in a negative way for many patients. The current study will evaluate the performance of a new intralaryngeal device for airway protection in a small group of patients who have chronic aspiration. The study will look at the overall performance of this device in preventing aspiration in this specific group of patients as well as determine any unforeseen risks of using this device in the identified group of patients. The outcomes will form the basis of future studies with larger groups of patients.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
2
Intralaryngeal prosthesis to protect the airways
Change From Baseline Per Patient of Number and Severity of Aspiration Events
In patient change from baseline measurement of aspiration severity and frequency of events at weeks 1,4,8,and 12
Time frame: 12 weeks
Number of Reported Adverse Events
Analysis of the reported system or procedure related adverse events using standard AE reporting form
Time frame: at device implantation
Number of Reported Adverse Events
Analysis of the the rate and severity of reported system or procedure related adverse events as a measure of safety of the device in this patient population over a 12 week period
Time frame: 2 weeks
Number of Participants With an Increase of Greater Than 1 on the Heyse-Moore Score
In patient change from baseline score of dyspnea using Heyse-Moore (Dyspnea)score: 0 = None 1. = Mild, some difficulty 2. = Moderate Difficulty but can continue 3. = Severe difficulty, cannot continue
Time frame: 1 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.