The aim of this study is to measure reaction times and thermal detection thresholds to CO2 laser stimulation of the skin, before and after a first degree thermal injury, in the primary and secondary hyperalgesia area, in order to investigate whether different nerve-fiber classes are activated in the post-injury phase. The study results are expected to uncover existence of a peripheral inflammatory input contributing to secondary hyperalgesia.
BACKGROUND The conduction speed of peripheral nerve fibers depends on the nerve diameter. The conduction velocity of large myelinated fibers are 50 - 120 m/s, while for the smaller myelinated A-delta- and unmyelinated C-fibers, they are in the range of 5-10 m/s, and 0.5-1 m/s, respectively. Applying short laser pulses with a high energy density and synchronization, simple reaction times can be used to determine the type of fiber class that has been activated. Research from the group of Plaghki and colleagues has shown that when stimulating surface areas are between 15 and 50 sq.mm at a supra-threshold intensity for activating A-delta-fibers, a typical bimodal response pattern is observed with a first peak centered around 400 ms and a second around 850 ms. Whereas the early peak is due to activation of A-delta-fibers, the second peak is caused by C-fiber activation. HYPOTHESIS Following a mild thermal skin injury (47ºC, 420 s, 9.0 or 12.5 sq.cm area) the injured area is associated with erythema and an increased sensitivity, i.e. pain is easily evoked by mechanical and thermal stimuli in the primary hyperalgesia area. In normal skin surrounding the injury mechanical and thermal allodynia and hyperalgesia, are present. Innocuous stimuli in this secondary hyperalgesia area may elicit pain. This is believed to be a central process suggested by pioneering research in the 1980s and 1990s. The term for this phenomenon is heterosynaptic central facilitation meaning that innocuous stimuli may activate normally high-threshold nociceptive dorsal horn neurons leading to allodynia. This conversion of an innocuous stimulus in normal skin just outside of the injury, to a pain generating stimulus, is the result of a change in the sensory processing within the CNS. This processing is probably regulated by spino-bulbo-spinal loops including the rostral ventro-medial medulla (RVM) and locus coeruleus (LC). The study hypotheses are, first, that the reaction times at the thermal injury site (i.e. primary hyperalgesia area) are changed compared to the pre-injury level. Second, that the sensory changes in the secondary hyperalgesia area, following a thermal injury, are not exclusively centrally mediated, but that also changes in peripheral afferents, e.g. A-delta-fibers (AMH type I) are demonstrable by assessments of reaction times to CO2 laser pulses. A well-known alternative to laser stimulation is the use of a contact thermode with a much larger stimulation area, i.e. 2.5 to 16 sq.cm. The substantially larger area of the contact thermode, combined with a slower heating rate, compared to the laser stimulus (\< 0.5 sq.cm, 10 ms), may induce pronounced spatial and temporal summation, interfering with accurate interpretation of sensory data. A recent method-comparison study in patients with postherpetic neuralgia, comparing assessments obtained by a contact thermode (9 sq.cm) and by laser stimuli (\< 0.25 sq.mm), indicates that the laser method is more sensitive and specific in detecting thermal sensory abnormalities. Since the laser stimulus gives a steeper slope of heating profile and a more synchronized activation of warmth- and heat-sensitive small fibers, i.e. C- and A-delta-fibers, in the skin laser stimulation is the preferred method in the present study. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The propensity for developing secondary hyperalgesia may reflect a predisposition for developing persistent postsurgical pain. It has been estimated that 2-10% of patients undergoing otherwise uncomplicated surgical procedures will suffer from persistent postsurgical pain. Investigating the pathophysiological mechanisms behind secondary hyperalgesia may therefore increase our understanding of the transition to chronic pain and thereby improve our management strategies for this large patient group.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
18
Laser stimuli are evenly applied in 15 spots (each 6 mm in diameter) in the primary hyperalgesic zone (application zone of the contact thermode) and in the secondary hyperalgesic zone (1 cm outside the application zone of the contact thermode).
BRAINLab, Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Panum Institute
Copenhagen, Denmark
Changes in distribution of reaction times assessed by laser stimuli in the thermal injury area (the primary hyperalgesia area) comparing post-injury values with pre-injury, baseline values.
Assessments are performed at Baseline, 1 h post-thermal injury and 24 h post-thermal injury. Changes compared to Baseline are analyzed.
Time frame: 24 hours
Changes in distribution of reaction times assessed by laser stimuli in the secondary hyperalgesia area comparing post-injury values with pre-injury, baseline values.
Assessments are performed at Baseline, 1 h post-thermal injury and 24 h post-thermal injury. Changes compared to Baseline are analyzed.
Time frame: 24 hours
Changes in thermal pain thresholds assessed by laser stimuli in the thermal injury area (the primary hyperalgesia area) comparing post-injury values with pre-injury, baseline values.
Assessments are performed at Baseline, 1 h post-thermal injury and 24 h post-thermal injury. Changes compared to Baseline are analyzed.
Time frame: 24 hours
Changes in thermal pain thresholds assessed by laser stimuli in the secondary hyperalgesia area comparing post-injury values with pre-injury, baseline values.
Assessments are performed at Baseline, 1 h post-thermal injury and 24 h post-thermal injury. Changes compared to Baseline are analyzed.
Time frame: 24 hours
Thermal detection thresholds assessed by laser stimuli in the thermal injury area (the primary hyperalgesia area) comparing post-injury values with pre-injury, baseline values.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 h post-thermal injury; 24 h post-thermal injury
Changes in thermal detection thresholds assessed by laser stimuli in the secondary hyperalgesia area comparing post-injury values with pre-injury, baseline values.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Assessments are performed at Baseline, 1 h post-thermal injury and 24 h post-thermal injury. Changes compared to Baseline are analyzed.
Time frame: 24 hours