PRINCE primary is cluster randomised waiting list controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility of an integrated approach to care in general practice for adults with persistent physical symptoms (PPS). PPS is defined as physical symptoms with no obvious underlying organic. 240 patients with PPS recruited from 8-12 GP practices in London will be randomised to the integrated care approach plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. The integrated GP approach consists of providing GPs with a short cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) skills training, ongoing supervision, as well as written and audio-visual materials/guidelines. In addition, participants randomised to the intervention group will receive tailored CBT-based self-help materials (i.e. written and audio-visual materials).
Patients with PPS are often severely functionally impaired and. They consume large amounts of healthcare and welfare benefits. There is an accumulating body of evidence showing that cognitive behavioural interventions can reduce levels of symptoms and improve overall functioning in patients with PPS. CBT has demonstrated both short-term and long-term efficacy with small to medium effect sizes for PPS. Larger treatment effects have been reported for specific PPS syndromes, including non-cardiac chest pain, Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). General practitioners (GPs) play a major role in identifying and managing patients with PPS. A previous randomised parallel group pilot trial investigated the feasibility (i.e. recruitment, retention and acceptability) of implementing a primary care Symptoms Clinic for patients with PPS). The Symptoms Clinic comprised a structured set of consultations delivered by a specially trained GP with a strong interest in PPS. The intervention included exploring potential biological mechanisms underlying the PPS condition, empathetic support, and training patients in symptom-management (i.e. medication or cognitive behavioural techniques). The results indicated that the Symptoms Clinic was acceptable to the majority of patients randomised to the intervention group, and may have the potential to generate clinically significant benefits. However, this pilot study did not assess feasibility parameters referring to GPs' willingness to participate in the study and undergo specialised psychological training. Moreover, the intervention was carried out by only one GP, raising questions about the generalizability of the study. Managing patients with PPS can be highly challenging in general practice. Although GPs recognise the treatment of PPS as a responsibility of primary care, previous studies show that GPs often feel powerless, frustrated and helpless when encountering these patients. Furthermore, GPs frequently report that factors such as time constraints and the lack of psychological training prevents them from effectively addressing patients' psychosocial needs and developing appropriate doctor-patient communication skills. The aim of this study is to assess whether it is feasible to conduct an adequately powered future trial to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a CBT-based integrated GP care approach for treating patients with PPS (please refer to arms and interventions for more details).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
161
The overall aims of the intervention are to help the patient: 1. develop an understanding of the relationship between cognitive, emotional, physiological and behavioral aspects of their problem; 2. understand factors that may be maintaining the problem; 3. learn how to modify the behavioral and cognitive responses which may be maintaining the problem; 4. adopt a healthy sleep routine which can promote healthy living. Hand-outs will be available for GPs to give to patients, but the structure of the intervention allows for treatment to be formulation-based so that particular issues raised in the consultation that might be maintaining symptom severity (e.g. avoidance) can be addressed.
Kings College London
London, United Kingdom
Feasibility: Willingness of clinicians to participate in the study (proportion of GPs that register within the study out of the GPs that are registered with the eligible practice)
The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".
Time frame: 24 weeks post randomization
Feasibility: Willingness of patients to use the provided material given in 'integrated GP care' (self-help material).
The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".
Time frame: 24 weeks post randomization
Feasibility: Willingness of practices and participants to be contacted about the study (Number (No.) of reply slips sent via the post to ask if the practice/participants would like to participate further information v No. of reply slips received back)
The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".
Time frame: 24 weeks post randomization
Feasibility: Willingness of practices to be randomised (No. of eligible GP practices agreed consent v No. of GP practices not agreed to consent)
The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".
Time frame: 24 weeks post randomization
Feasibility: Willingness of GP practices to be consent and be randomized as assessed by No. of eligible GP practices agreed consent v No. of GP practices not agreed to consent
The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".
Time frame: 24 weeks post randomization
Feasibility: Follow-up rates and response rates to questionnaires (Sent questionnaires v completed questionnaires received at 12 and 24 weeks).
The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".
Time frame: 24 weeks post randomization
Feasibility: Rate of eligible trial participants (Consort). The number of patients per practice that are initially screened for eligibility and the number per practice meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".
Time frame: 24 weeks post randomization
Feasibility: Availability of data required and the usefulness and limitations of GP databases assessed qualitatively
The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".
Time frame: 24 weeks post randomization
Feasibility: Willingness of participants to be consented and randomised (No. of positive reply slips received V No. of patients agreed to be screened, No. of eligible patients agreed consent v No. of eligible patients not agreed to consent)
The following definition of a feasibility study has been agreed by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME), Public Health Research (PHR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme: "Feasibility Studies are pieces of research done before a main study in order to answer the question "Can this study be done?". They are used to estimate important parameters that are needed to design the main study".
Time frame: 24 weeks post randomization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.