This phase II trial studies how well rituximab and pembrolizumab with or without lenalidomide works in treating patients with follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that has returned after a period of improvement. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab and pembrolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as lenalidomide, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving rutuximab with pembrolizumab and lenalidomide may work better at treating follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the overall response rate (ORR) in subjects with relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) treated with rituximab plus pembrolizumab. II. To determine the ORR in subjects with relapsed/refractory FL and relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have failed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy and are treated with rituximab in combination with pembrolizumab and lenalidomide. (Cohort 2) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the safety and toxicity. II. To determine the complete response rate (CRR). III. To determine the overall progression-free survival (PFS). IV. To compare PFS between patients relapsing =\< one year vs \> one year after last prior therapy. V. To determine the overall survival (OS). VI. To determine the safety and toxicity. (Cohort 2) VII. To determine the CRR. (Cohort 2) VIII. To determine the overall PFS. (Cohort 2) IX. To compare PFS between patients relapsing =\< one year vs \> one year after last prior therapy. (Cohort 2) X. To determine the OS. (Cohort 2) EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine effects of rituximab plus pembrolizumab therapy on peripheral blood T cells. II. To correlate features of peripheral blood T cells with toxicities after rituximab plus pembrolizumab therapy. III. To correlate features of peripheral blood T cells with response and PFS after rituximab plus pembrolizumab therapy. IV. To correlate baseline tumor characteristics with response and PFS after rituximab plus pembrolizumab therapy. V. To determine effects of rituximab, pembrolizumab, and lenalidomide therapy on peripheral blood T cells. (Cohort 2) VI. To correlate features of peripheral blood T cells with toxicities after rituximab, pembrolizumab, and lenalidomide therapy. (Cohort 2) VII. To correlate features of peripheral blood T cells with response and PFS after rituximab, pembrolizumab, and lenalidomide therapy. (Cohort 2) VIII. To correlate baseline tumor characteristics with response and PFS after rituximab, pembrolizumab, and lenalidomide therapy. (Cohort 2) OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 cohorts. COHORT I: Patients receive rituximab intravenously (IV) over 4-8 hours on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Patients also receive pembrolizumab IV over 1 hour on day 2 every 3 weeks for up to 16 cycles (1 year) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. COHORT II: Patients receive rituximab IV over 4-8 hours on days 1, 8 and 15 of cycle 1, and day 1 of cycle 2. Patients also receive pembrolizumab IV over 1 hour on day 2 every 3 weeks for up to 2 years, and lenalidomide orally (PO) on days 1-14 every 3 weeks for up to 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days, every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months thereafter.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
53
Correlative studies
Given PO
Given IV
Given IV
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Overall Response Rate (Complete + Partial Responses)
To determine the overall response rate (ORR) in subjects with relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) treated with Rituximab plus pembrolizumab therapy. II. To determine the ORR in subjects with relapsed/refractory FL and relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who failed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy and rea treated with rituximab in combination with pembrolizumab and lenalidomide (Cohort 2)
Time frame: Approximately 1 year and 6 months
Incidence of Toxicity
Will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Toxicity will be monitored simultaneously using the Bayesian stopping boundaries calculated based on beta-binomial distributions. Toxicity defined as any grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity that in the opinion of the principal investigator is at least possibly related to study treatment. Toxicity evaluation will be based on the incidence of severity and type of adverse events (including physical and laboratory). Frequency tables will be used to summarize categorical variables. Logistic regression will be utilized to assess the effect of patient prognostic factors on the toxicity rate.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after the completion of study treatment
Complete Response Rate
Logistic regression will be utilized to assess the effect of patient prognostic factors on the response rate.
Time frame: Up to 2 years after completion of study treatment
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
The PFS will be compared between patients relapsing =\< 1 year vs \> 1 year after last prior therapy. The distribution of time-to-event endpoints will be estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Comparison of time-to-event endpoints by important subgroups will be made using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression will be employed for multivariate analysis on time-to-event outcomes.
Time frame: Up to 2 years after completion of study treatment
Overall Survival
The distribution of time-to-event endpoints will be estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Comparison of time-to-event endpoints by important subgroups will be made using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression will be employed for multivariate analysis on time-to-event outcomes.
Time frame: Up to 2 years after completion of study treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.