Study to assess the potential effects of lurbinectedin (PM01183) at a therapeutic dose on the duration of the QTc interval, measured by electrocardiograms (ECGs), to characterize the PM01183 plasma concentration/QTc relationship, and to explore related ECG parameters in patients with selected solid tumors.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
39
Sarcoma Oncology Research Center
Santa Monica, California, United States
University of Colorado Cancer Center
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Change in QTcF (QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula)
ΔQTCF (Change in QTcF); EOI (end of infusion); LSM (Least Square Means); PK (Pharmacokinetic(s)). On Day 1 (D1) of Cycle 1 (C1), LSM ΔQTcF should have low difference values, without any clear trend to change with time. Therefore, the upper bound (UB) of the (two-sided) 90%Confidence Interval (CI) at all time points had to be less than the protocol-specified cut-off of 20 ms at each time point. If so, non-inferiority of any ECG time point to baseline with respect of QTc prolongation could be concluded
Time frame: Scheduled post-baseline ECG time points were taken 5-10 min before their time-matched PK samples: i.e., 5 min before EOI, 30 min, 1, 3, 24, 72 and 168 hours after EOI of Cycle 1, and 5 min before EOI, 30 min, 1, 3 and 168 hours after EOI of Cycle 2.
Relationship Between ΔQTcF and Time-matched Lurbinectedin Plasma Concentrations (Plasma Concentration)
ΔQTcF (Change from Baseline in QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula); CI (Confidence Interval); Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration). Table below details the results of the linear mixed effects model to quantify the relationship between the lurbinectedin plasma concentrations and ΔQTcF and Predicted ΔQTcF and 90% CI at mean lurbinectedin Cmax.
Time frame: Through study completion, each patient had to be followed for 2 cycles (1 cycle =3 weeks)
Relationship Between ΔQTcF and Time-matched Lurbinectedin Plasma Concentrations (Predicted ΔQTcF)
ΔQTcF (Change from Baseline in QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula); CI (Confidence Interval); Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration). Table below details the results of the linear mixed effects model to quantify the relationship between the lurbinectedin plasma concentrations and ΔQTcF and Predicted ΔQTcF and 90% CI at mean lurbinectedin Cmax.
Time frame: Through study completion, each patient had to be followed for 2 cycles (1 cycle =3 weeks)
Relationship Between ΔQTcF and Time-matched Lurbinectedin Plasma Concentrations (Intercept)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Dana Farber Cancer lnstitute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Cancer Therapy & Research Center
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Hospital Universitari Vall D'Hebron
Barcelona, Spain
Complejo Hospitalario Regional Reina Sofía
Córdoba, Spain
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, Spain
Hospital Ramón Y Cajal
Madrid, Spain
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz
Madrid, Spain
...and 6 more locations
ΔQTcF (Change from Baseline in QT Corrected According to Fridericia's Formula); CI (Confidence Interval); Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration). Table below details the results of the linear mixed effects model to quantify the relationship between the lurbinectedin plasma concentrations and ΔQTcF and Predicted ΔQTcF and 90% CI at mean lurbinectedin Cmax.
Time frame: Through study completion, each patient had to be followed for 2 cycles (1 cycle =3 weeks)