The investigators designed a randomized clinical trial (stem cell emergency life threatening arteriopathy or SCELTA) to compare the therapeutic efficacy of the auto-transplant of enriched circulating EPCs (ECEPCs) with auto-transplant of BM-MNCs. ECEPCs, obtained by immunoselection of CD14+ and CD34+ cells, or BM-MNCs, were injected intramuscularly in the affected limb of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).
Peripheral arterial disease comprises a clinical spectrum that extends from no symptoms to presentation with critical limb ischemia (CLI), which is a very invalidating condition characterized by rest pain, march inability, trophic lesions and unavoidable progression to major amputations, which are burdened by a high mortality in the first year. The pathophysiology of CLI often associates with a defect in the development of collateral vessels and angiogenesis, a process which refers to the formation of new blood vessels into tissue, due to circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and vascular progenitor cells. In the last few years, significant improvement of this condition has been reported following bone marrow (BM) autotransplant or autotransplant of peripheral EPCs mobilized from BM through the injection of granulocyte-colony stimulatory factor (G-CSF). In a previous study, the investigators found that individually variable proportions of circulating CD14+ cells expressed low levels of CD34 (CD14+CD34low) and revealed the functional phenotype of EPCs. The investigators therefore designed a monocentric randomized clinical trial to compare the therapeutic efficacy of BM autotransplant with the autotransplant of a population of circulating CD34+ and CD14+CD34low enriched by a closed sterile immunomagnetic system (enriched circulating EPCs or ECEPCs), without a previous EPC mobilization from BM. Patients will be evaluated for clinical parameters and ABI, TBI, TCp02 before autotransplant and at three follow-up times after the autotransplant (4, 24 and 52 weeks); also angio-TAC of legs, capillaroscopy, and photoplethysmography will be evaluated at 4, and even at 52 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
45
intramuscular injection of circulating EPC at leg level
intramuscular injection of BM MNC at leg level
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi
Florence, Tuscany, Italy
Safety as measured by evaluation of any adverse event temporary correlated with the treatment
Evaluation of any adverse event temporary correlated with the treatment
Time frame: 52 weeks of follow-up
Changes in ischemic leg perfusion from baseline
Improvement of leg perfusion as assessed by values of Time to Pick (TTP) evaluated by ultrasound tools
Time frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Improvement of Mean values of the transcutaneous partial oxygen pressure (TCP02)
Improvement of mean values of the transcutaneous partial oxygen pressure of at least 20%
Time frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Improvement of mean values of ankle brachial pressure index (ABI)
improvement (at least 25% increase) of Mean values of ankle brachial pressure index
Time frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Improvement of vessel anatomical status
Improvement of leg vascularization as assessed by color Doppler ultrasound
Time frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Improvement of leg perfusion
Improvement of leg perfusion as assessed by plethysmography characterization
Time frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Improvement of vessel anatomical status
Improvement of leg vascularization as assessed by Angio-CT, defined as presence of new vessels
Time frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Quality of life Improvement
Quality of life, as assessed by the disease-specific ST22 and SF36 questionaries
Time frame: -28, 0, 28 weeks of follow-up
improvement of rest pain
Rest pain as evaluated by visual analogue pain scale (VAS)
Time frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Improvement of trophic limb lesions
Mean score of trophic limb lesions, as evaluated according to Wagner international grade
Time frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Reduction of numbers of major amputation (amputation free survival )
Reduction of numbers of major amputation compared with untreated patients
Time frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
improvement of microvascular anatomy
evaluation of microvascular anatomy as assessed by capillaroscopy
Time frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up