Minoxidil 5% / Botanical Hair Regimen in Men With Thinning Hair and Male Pattern Hair Loss/Androgenic Alopecia

Galderma R&D63 enrolled

Overview

The purpose of this study is to characterize the effect of Minoxidil 5% Foam and Botanical Hair Solution Regimen in men with thinning hair and male pattern hair loss/androgenic alopecia (Norwood III \& IV).

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Male Pattern of Hair Loss, Androgenic Alopecia

Interventions

Treatment: Minoxidil 5% / Botanical Hair Solution for MenDRUG

Eligibility

Sex: MALEMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 60 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male patients age 18 to 60 years at the time of enrollment. 2. Men who have self-perceived thinning hair. 3. Men who have presentation of male pattern hair loss/androgenic alopecia (Norwood III \& IV). Key Exclusion Criteria: 1. History of allergic reactions or severe intolerance to minoxidil and Botanical Hair Solution product ingredients. 2. Plan to use any other concomitant therapy to treat hair loss, regrowth or volume during the study. 3 Subjects taking or planning to take topical or systemic prescription or OTC medications for treating hair loss and/or hair volume. 4\. Any significant history of concurrent medical disease, which in the judgment of the Investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for entry to this study including history of skin disease that may confound study results.

Locations (1)

Stephens & Associates

Richardson, Texas, United States

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Investigator's Rating of Standardized Global Photographs at Week 12

The Investigator or a trained grader rated each participant's standardized global photographs for improvement from baseline for parameters like hair thinning, hair growth, impression of scalp hair coverage and overall perception of treatment benefit using a 1-to-7-point Likert scale. Investigator global photograph rating were assessed using 7-point Likert scale. Each score on the individual scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum), that is, (1) Entirely Disagree; (2) Mostly Disagree; (3) Somewhat Disagree; (4) Neither Agree nor Disagree; (5) Somewhat Agree; (6) Mostly Agree; (7) Entirely Agree.

Time frame: At Week 12

Change From Baseline in Participant Rating at Week 12

Participants rated the parameters like appearance of hair, growth of hair, satisfaction with hairline at the front of the head, satisfaction with hair on the top of the head and satisfaction with hair overall as an overall improvement from the baseline by conducting their own assessments by looking in a mirror and evaluating improvement from baseline using a 1 to 7-point Likert scale. Each score on the individual scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum), that is, (1) Entirely Disagree; (2) Mostly Disagree; (3) Somewhat Disagree; (4) Neither Agree nor Disagree; (5) Somewhat Agree; (6) Mostly Agree; (7) Entirely Agree.

Time frame: At Week 12

Secondary Outcomes

Mean Change From Baseline in Shed Hair Count

Participants collected their hair full day, including after combing and hair-washing. Participants turned in these hair collections at each visit. The results were averaged weekly. Mean change from baseline in hair wash/shed hair count was reported at Week 12.

Time frame: At Week 12

Number of Participant in Each Response Category Based on Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire

Participant's satisfaction questionnaire was used to specifically collect the participants' feedback on the treatment regimen, the level of satisfaction and future usage. Participants were asked to complete a cosmetic acceptability questionnaire. This 10 item questionnaire had a 5-point Likert Response Scale (1=Strongly Agree; 5=Strongly Disagree).

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.