The purpose of this study is to determine whether AB103 is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) receiving standard of care therapy.
The primary hypothesis of this study is that in addition to standard of care treatment (which includes surgical intervention, antimicrobial therapy and critical care support for organ dysfunction or failure), AB103 will demonstrate a clinically significant treatment benefit over placebo. This hypothesis will be addressed by measuring the effect of AB103 on a composite of clinical parameters associated with the disease course of patients with NSTI, using a responder analysis. A responding patient must meet all 5 parameters of the composite clinical success end point, while a non-responding patient can fail by not meeting any one of the parameters. These analyses are designed to demonstrate that in addition to being safe, one dose of 0.5 mg/kg of AB103 will: Improve systemic signs of the infection by improving organ function of patients compared to placebo as measured by: * Survival at Day 28 * Modified SOFA (mSOFA) score on Day 14 and change from baseline to Day 14 ≥ 3. A Day 14 mSOFA score of ≤1 and a change from baseline (pre-treatment) to Day 14 ≥3 will be required for a patient to achieve the primary composite clinical success endpoint (NICCE) Improve the local signs of the infection, as measured by: * Reduced number of debridements, counted to Day 14. No more than 3 debridements to Day 14 will be required for a patient to achieve composite clinical success * No amputation after the first debridement (amputation on the first debridement is not considered a failure). A patient will be required to have had no amputations done after the first surgical procedure in order to achieve composite clinical success. 290 patients will be recruited into the study and randomized to receive either 0.5 mg/kg AB103 or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization will be stratified within center by the diagnosis of Fournier's Gangrene and mSOFA score category (3-4 vs \>4) at screening. The study will be conducted with interim analyses for futility at 100 patients and safety monitored by an independent Data Monitoring Board at regular planned intervals.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
290
Number of Patients Achieving Necrotizing Infections Clinical Composite Endpoint (NICCE)
NICCE was made up of the following 5 components, all of which had to be met to successfully achieve the primary outcome measure (i.e., a "responder"): (i) Alive at Day 28, (ii) ≤ 3 debridements through Day 14, (iii) No amputation performed after the first debridement, (iv) Day 14 modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (mSOFA) score ≤ 1, and (v) Reduction of ≥ 3 mSOFA score points between Baseline and Day 14. This analysis compared responders in the reltecimod group versus responders in the placebo group. Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (mSOFA) total scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores reflecting a worse clinical status or outcome. An mSOFA total score of 0 or 1 reflects resolution of organ dysfunction/failure.
Time frame: 28 days
Number of Patients With One or More Adverse Events (AEs)
Number of Patients With One or More Adverse Events (AEs). Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) are included in this outcome measure since SAEs are a subset of AEs.
Time frame: 28 days
Number of Patients With One or More Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Number of Patients with One or More Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study
Time frame: 28 days
Number of Patients With One or More Secondary Infections
Number of Patients with One or More Secondary Infections During the Study
Time frame: 28 days
Number of Patients Achieving Day 14 Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (mSOFA) Score of 0 or 1
Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (mSOFA) total scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores reflecting a worse clinical status or outcome. An mSOFA total score of 0 or 1 reflects resolution of organ dysfunction/failure.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Maricopa Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Banner University Medical Center
Tucson, Arizona, United States
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Loma Linda University Medical Center
Loma Linda, California, United States
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of California, Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
UCSD Medical Center
San Diego, California, United States
UCH-Memorial Health System
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
University of Colorado Hospital
Denver, Colorado, United States
...and 61 more locations
Time frame: 14 days
Intensive Care Unit (ICU)-Free Days
ICU-free days refers to the number of days a patient did not spend time in the ICU through Day 28.
Time frame: 28 days
Ventilator-free Days
Ventilator-free days refers to the number of days a patient was not on a ventilator through Day 28.
Time frame: 28 days
Vasopressor-free Days
Vasopressor-free days refers to the number of days a patient did not receive a vasopressor through Day 28.
Time frame: 28 days
Hospital Days
Hospital days refers to the number of days a patient spent time in the hospital.
Time frame: 90 days or until end of follow up
Number of Patients With a More Favorable or Less Favorable Hospital Discharge Location
Number of patients with more favorable discharge location (home or rehabilitation facility) or less favorable discharge location (skilled nursing facility, another acute care facility, death, other)
Time frame: 90 days