The primary objective of study Part A is to assess the safety of talacotuzumab (formerly CSL362) monotherapy and confirm the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) in participants with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for whom experimental therapy is appropriate. The primary objective of study Part B are to assess complete response (CR) rate and overall survival (OS) in participants with AML who are not eligible for intense induction chemotherapy and who are randomly assigned to receive decitabine plus talacotuzumab at the RP2D or decitabine alone.
This is a 2-part, open-label, multicenter, Phase 2/3 study conducted in participants with AML who are suitable for experimental therapy (Part A) and in participants with untreated AML who are not eligible for intense induction chemotherapy or hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (Part B). In Study Part A, the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile will be assessed to confirm the RP2D of 9 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) talacotuzumab. In Study Part B, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either decitabine + talacotuzumab (arm 1) or decitabine alone (arm 2). Blood and bone marrow sampling will be done in Part A and B for disease assessment, PK, PD, and biomarkers will be collected in all participants. Safety will be monitored throughout the study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
326
Decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/\[m\^2\]) from Day 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of a 28-day cycle.
Talacotuzumab 9 milligram per kilogram mg/kg on Day 8 and 22 of a 28-day cycle.
Unnamed facility
Orange, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Unnamed facility
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Unnamed facility
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Unnamed facility
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Unnamed facility
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response (Complete Response Rate) Based on Investigator Assessment
Complete response rate defined as percentage of participants who achieved complete response as per modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria. CR: Bone marrow blasts less than (\<)5 percent (%); absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count greater than (\>)1.0\*10\^9/liter (L) (1000/micro liter \[mcL\]); platelet count \>100\*10\^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions. This endpoint is reported here for Part B only as per the planned analysis.
Time frame: Approximately up to 2.5 years
Part B: Overall Survival
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to date of death from any cause. Median Overall Survival was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. This endpoint is reported here for Part B only as per the planned analysis.
Time frame: Approximately up to 2.5 years
Part B: Event-free Survival (EFS) Based on Investigator Assessment
EFS defined as time from randomization to treatment failure, relapse from CR/CRi, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, per modified IWG criteria. Treatment failure: \>25% absolute increase in the bone marrow blast count from baseline to present assessment (example, 20% to 46%) on bone marrow aspirate (or biopsy in case of dry tap); Relapse: Bone marrow blasts greater than equal to (\>=)5%; reappearance of blasts in blood; or development of extramedullary disease; CR: Bone marrow blasts \<5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count \> 1.0\*10\^9/L (1000/mcL); platelet count \>100\*10\^9/L (100 000/mcL);independence of red cell transfusions; CRi: Bone marrow blasts \<5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; residual neutropenia \<1.0\*10\^9/L (1000/mcL) or thrombocytopenia \<100\*10\^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions. Endpoint reported is for Part B only as per planned analysis.
Time frame: Approximately up to 2.5 years
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CR and CRi (Overall Response Rate)
Percentage of participants who achieved CR and CRi, as per modified IWG criteria. CR: Bone marrow blasts less than (\<)5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count greater than (\>)1.0 \*10\^9/liter (L) (1000/ mcL); platelet count \>100 \*10\^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions; CRi: Bone marrow blasts \<5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; residual neutropenia \<1.0\*10\^9/L (1000/mcL) or thrombocytopenia \<100\*10\^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions. This endpoint is reported here for Part B only as per the planned analysis.
Time frame: Approximately up to 2.5 years
Part B: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) Plus Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative Complete Response With Incomplete Recovery (CRi)
Percentage of participants who achieved CR plus MRD-negative CRi were reported. MRD negativity defined as \<1 blast or leukemic stem cell in 10,000 leukocytes (MRD level \<10\^4).CR: Bone marrow blasts less than (\<)5 percent (%); absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count greater than (\>)1.0\*10\^9/liter (L) (1000/mcL); platelet count \>100\*10\^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions; CRi: Bone marrow blasts \<5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; residual neutropenia \<1.0\*10\^9/L (1000/mcL) or thrombocytopenia \<100\*10\^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions. This endpoint is reported here for Part B only as per the planned analysis.
Time frame: Approximately 2.5 years
Part B: Time to Best Response
Time to best response is calculated as the time from the randomization date to the first documented date for the best response for participants who achieved CR or CRi, as per modified IWG criteria. CR: Bone marrow blasts less than (\<)5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count greater than (\>)1.0 \*10\^9/liter (L) (1000/mcL); platelet count \>100\*10\^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions; CRi: Bone marrow blasts \<5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; residual neutropenia \<1.0\*10\^9/L (1000/mcL) or thrombocytopenia \<100\*10\^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions. This endpoint is reported here for Part B only as per the planned analysis.
Time frame: Approximately 2.5 years
Part B: Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Investigator Assessment
DOR defined as number of weeks from documented best response (CR or CRi) for participants who achieved CR or CRi to relapse, death due to relapse, date of censoring. As per modified IWG criteria: CR: Bone marrow blasts \<5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease;absolute neutrophil count \>1.0\*10\^9/L (1000/mcL); platelet count \>100\*10\^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions; CRi: Bone marrow blasts \<5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; residual neutropenia \<1.0\* 10\^9/L (1000/mcL) or thrombocytopenia \<100\*10\^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions. This endpoint is reported here for Part B only as per the planned analysis.
Time frame: Approximately 2.5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
New York, New York, United States
Unnamed facility
Rochester, New York, United States
Unnamed facility
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Unnamed facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unnamed facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
...and 71 more locations