The epidemiology and transmission dynamics of influenza in hospitals are only poorly understood, particularly with respect to subjects without symptoms of influenza infection (e.g. without fever, cough, sore throat, nasal congestion, weakness, headache, loss of appetite, or myalgia). Knowledge about whether asymptomatic subjects are able to transmit influenza is of major importance. If they do transmit influenza, vaccination of patients and healthcare workers (HCW) before start of the influenza season, the permanent use of masks by HCW during influenza season, and quarantine for previously exposed inpatients may be the only available measures to reduce the number of influenza transmission events from asymptomatic subjects in acute care hospitals. Closure of this knowledge gap would be of major benefit to infection prevention and control recommendations, and may in turn reduce morbidity and mortality associated with influenza in hospitals through improved patient management.
The epidemiology and transmission dynamics of influenza in hospitals are only poorly understood, particularly with respect to subjects without symptoms of influenza infection (e.g. without fever, cough, sore throat, nasal congestion, weakness, headache, loss of appetite, or myalgia). Knowledge about whether asymptomatic subjects are able to transmit influenza is of major importance. If they do transmit influenza, vaccination of patients and healthcare workers (HCW) before start of the influenza season, the permanent use of masks by HCW during influenza season, and quarantine for previously exposed inpatients may be the only available measures to reduce the number of influenza transmission events from asymptomatic subjects in acute care hospitals. The investigators' key aim is therefore to define whether exposure to asymptomatic subjects with influenza infection constitutes a risk for influenza transmission in an acute care hospital setting through active, prospective surveillance. The investigators' secondary aims are to describe the prevalence of community-acquired symptomatic and asymptomatic influenza upon hospital admission and the incidence of asymptomatic and symptomatic nosocomial influenza among inpatients; to assess transmission dynamics of symptomatic influenza infection in acute care; and to study the incidence of asymptomatic and symptomatic influenza, absenteeism (i.e. being absent from work due to influenza), presenteeism (i.e. being present at work despite influenza infection) associated with influenza, and compliance with infection control recommendations to prevent spread of influenza in acute care HCW. The investigators plan to enroll 1,260 inpatients and 180 HCW from medical wards at the University Hospital Zurich in a prospective study over two consecutive influenza seasons in order to detect at least one transmission event from an asymptomatic individual shedding influenza virus. Flocked mid-turbinate nasal swabs will be collected daily from consenting inpatients starting from day of admission until two days after discharge and from HCW over the influenza (winter) season and analyzed for influenza A and B using polymerase chain reaction. Simultaneously, signs and symptoms of influenza infection (including cough, sore throat, fever \>37.8°C, nasal congestion, weakness, headache, loss of appetite or myalgia) as well as contact patterns between inpatients and HCW will be recorded. Reconstruction of influenza transmission chains will be based on phylogenetic analyses derived from next-generation sequence data and epidemiological contact tracing.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
700
University Hospital Zurich
Zurich, Switzerland
Secondary attack rate of asymptomatic or presymptomatic influenza among inpatients, among acute care workers and between inpatients and acute care HCW in an acute care hospital setting
diagnosed by positive influenza PCR from flocked mid-turbinate nasal swab collected in symptomatic or asymptomatic individuals following face-to-face contact with an individual with symptomatic influenza infection on the day of contact.
Time frame: up to 6 months
Secondary attack rate of symptomatic influenza among inpatients, among acute care workers and between inpatients and acute care HCW in an acute care hospital setting
Secondary attack rate of symptomatic influenza among inpatients, among acute care workers and between inpatients and acute care HCW in an acute care hospital setting: as diagnosed by positive influenza PCR from flocked mid-turbinate nasal swab collected in symptomatic or asymptomatic individuals following face-to-face contact with an individual with symptomatic influenza infection on the day of contact. Transmissions will be considered 'proven' if confirmed by phylogenetic analyses. Specifically, we expect that whole-genome sequence analysis will demonstrate identical or almost identical influenza strains within transmission chains. Transmissions will be considered 'probable' if there is epidemiological evidence of face-to-face contact and identical strains have been identified in PCR but whole-genome sequencing was technically unsuccessful;
Time frame: up to 6 months
Proportion of asymptomatic and symptomatic inpatients with influenza infection upon hospital admission: as diagnosed by influenza polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from flocked mid-turbinate nasal swabs collected upon hospital admission
diagnosed by influenza PCR from flocked mid-turbinate nasal swabs collected upon hospital admission
Time frame: up to 6 months
Incidence of asymptomatic (A5) and symptomatic (A6) nosocomial influenza in hospital inpatients, defined as the number of emerging influenza infections >72 hours after hospital admissions per 100 patient-days
diagnosed by PCR from flocked mid-turbinate nasal swabs collected three times per week over the influenza season
Time frame: up to 6 months
Incidence of asymptomatic (A7) and symptomatic (A8) influenza in acute care hospital workers defined as the number of influenza infections per 100 HCW per influenza season
diagnosed by influenza PCR from flocked mid-turbinate nasal swabs collected three times per week over the influenza season collected three times per week over the influenza season
Time frame: up to 6 months
Association of individual influenza symptoms with influenza transmission from subjects with symptomatic influenza infection
Association of individual influenza symptoms with influenza transmission from subjects with symptomatic influenza infection
Time frame: up to 6 months
Influenza-attributable mortality in inpatients, expressed as infection-fatality rate, i.e. number of deaths among those infected
number of deaths among those infected
Time frame: up to 6 months
Absenteeism: as defined by total number of days absent from work due to PCR-proven influenza divided by total number of days due to work in HCW
Absenteeism: as defined by total number of days absent from work due to PCR-proven influenza divided by total number of days due to work in HCW;
Time frame: up to 6 months
Presenteeism: as defined by total number of days with symptoms of influenza present at work divided by total number of days due to work in HCW with PCR-proven influenza infection
Presenteeism: as defined by total number of days with symptoms of influenza present at work divided by total number of days due to work in HCW with PCR-proven influenza infection;
Time frame: up to 6 months
Compliance with hand hygiene recommendations and cough etiquette (including barrier precautions) in HCW according to repeated observations
Compliance with hand hygiene recommendations and cough etiquette (including barrier precautions) in HCW according to repeated observations;
Time frame: up to 6 months
Association of patient and HCW characteristics, including receipt of influenza vaccine, with asymptomatic viral shedding, as compared to symptomatic shedding
Association of patient and HCW characteristics, including receipt of influenza vaccine, with asymptomatic viral shedding, as compared to symptomatic shedding;
Time frame: up to 6 months
Association between viral load and asymptomatic or symptomatic transmission based on quantification of viral shedding according to cycle threshold (Ct) values from PCR
defined as the number of cycles required for the fluorescent signal to cross the threshold (i.e. exceeds background level).
Time frame: up to 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.