Emerging research suggests the use of self-regulation (SR) strategies at improving functional regain in patients with brain injury. SR is proposed to produce an added effect to the effective constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). This study aimed to examine the efficacy of a self-regulated CIMT program (SR-CIMT) for function regain of patients with subacute stroke. It was hypothesized that participants receiving the combined treatment (SR and CIMT) would have a better functional regain.
Background - Emerging research suggests the use of self-regulation (SR) strategies at improving functional regain in patients with brain injury. SR is proposed to produce an added effect to the effective constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). Objective - This study aimed to examine the efficacy of a self-regulated CIMT program (SR-CIMT) for function regain of patients with sub-acute stroke. Methods - Seventy-six patients were randomly assigned to the self-regulated constraint-induced movement therapy (SR-CIMT; n=25), constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT; n=27) or conventional functional rehabilitation (control; n=24) groups, and completed the trial. The SR-CIMT intervention was two-week therapist-guided training using the SR strategy to reflect on the relearning of functional tasks with CIMT. Outcome measurements were for upper limb function (Action Research Arm Test, ARAT, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, FMA), daily task performance (Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, Lawton IADL) and self-perceived functional ability (Motor Activity Log, MAL) at pre and post intervention intervals, and at one month follow up.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
76
There were 10 tasks to practice in total, they included fold laundry, put clothes on hanger, brush teeth, dress upper garment, dress lower garment in week one; and use telephone, prepare a cup of tea, sweep floor, wash towel, wash dishes in week two. In the 4 hours when the participants had their non-hemiplegic arm in the restrain, they received one hour therapist-guided training using SR strategy on task relearning as described above. Therefore, all participants received 10 one-hour therapist-guided training sessions (daily on weekdays, total two weeks). The intervention was delivered by occupational therapist. For the rest of the 3 hours in the restrain, the participants' wearing of the restrain was monitored by the nursing staff in the ward.
They practised the same 10 tasks as in the SR-CIMT and control groups. The same as the experimental intervention group (SR-CIMT), in the 4 hours when the participants had their non-hemiplegic arm in the restrain, they received one hour therapist-guided training using the strategy on task relearning as described above. Therefore, all participants received 10 one-hour therapist-guided training sessions (daily on weekdays, total two weeks). The intervention was delivered by occupational therapist. For the rest of the 3 hours in the restrain, the participants' wearing of the restrain was monitored by the nursing staff in the ward.
Shatin Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Pok Oi Hospital
Yuen Long, Hong Kong
Change from baseline in Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale after the intervention
Performance assessment on 8 daily tasks
Time frame: Baseline and after the intervention (2 weeks)
Change from baseline in Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale at one month after the intervention completed
Performance assessment on 8 daily tasks
Time frame: Baseline and one month after the intervention completed (1 month and 2 weeks)
Change from baseline in Action Research Arm Test after the intervention
Performance assessment on arm function
Time frame: Baseline and after the intervention (2 weeks)
Change from baseline in Action Research Arm Test at one month after the intervention completed
Performance assessment on arm function
Time frame: Baseline and one month after the intervention completed (1 month and 2 weeks)
Change from baseline in Fugl Meyer Assessment, upper extremity motor subsection after the intervention
Performance assessment on arm function
Time frame: Baseline and after the intervention (2 weeks)
Change from baseline in Fugl Meyer Assessment, upper extremity motor subsection at one month after the intervention completed
Performance assessment on arm function
Time frame: Baseline and one month after the intervention completed (1 month and 2 weeks)
Change from baseline in Motor Activity Log-28 after the intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
They practised the same 10 tasks as in the SR-CIMT group described above. They received training for 2 weeks, 5 days a week (therapy days), the same as in the SR-CIMT and CIMT groups.
Self-reported assessment on daily function
Time frame: Baseline and after the intervention (2 weeks)
Change from baseline in Motor Activity Log-28 at one month after the intervention completed
Self-reported assessment on daily function
Time frame: Baseline and one month after the intervention completed (1 month and 2 weeks)