This protocol seeks to build on the favorable results of the investigators' phase I trial (Pro00015617) by extending the findings to a larger cohort of subjects.In this study, the investigators hypothesize that 21Gy (Gray) as a single fraction can be delivered preoperatively to a larger group of subjects (n100). The primary objective is to determine physician reported rates of good/excellent cosmesis at baseline and 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years post-treatment as measured by the NRG cosmesis scale
The study team hypothesizes that a single fraction of 21Gy can be delivered preoperatively to the intact breast tumor with acceptable cosmetic outcomes. Furthermore, the investigators anticipate that pre- and post-radiation breast tumor samples will provide an avenue for understanding breast cancer radiation response Rationale for single-fraction preoperative technique This trial is proposed to build on the favorable results of the investigators' phase I trial by extending the findings to a larger cohort of subjects. The preoperative approach has several advantages: 1. a small intact breast tumor results in significantly less uninvolved breast tissue receiving high radiation doses which likely decreases toxicity; 2. more accurate targeting of the high-risk areas of subclinical disease surrounding the tumor is possible, 3. smaller treatment volumes are amenable to dose escalation which can further accelerate treatment and improve accessibility for subjects, 4. this technical approach is widely utilized in other tumor sites and can be delivered at most radiation facilities 5. the pre-operative approach provides a novel opportunity to study breast cancer radiation response.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
110
Single fraction of 21 Gy stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT)delivered pre-operatively to subjects with early stage breast cancer
Duke Cancer Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Number of Participants With Physician Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis
Physician will independently complete the physician NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at the designated time points. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.
Time frame: 6 months
Number of Participants With Physician Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis
Physician will independently complete the physician NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at the designated time points. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.
Time frame: 1 year
Number of Participants With Physician Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis
Physician will independently complete the physician NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at the designated time points. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.
Time frame: 2 years
Number of Participants With Physician Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis.
Physician will independently complete the physician NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at the designated time points. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.
Time frame: 3 years
Number of Participants With Patient Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Patients will independently complete the patient NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at designated timepoints. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.
Time frame: baseline
Number of Participants With Patient Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis
Patients will independently complete the patient NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at designated timepoints. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.
Time frame: 6 months
Number of Participants With Patient Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis
Patients will independently complete the patient NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at designated timepoints. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.
Time frame: 12 months
Number of Participants With Patient Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis
Patients will independently complete the patient NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at designated timepoints. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.
Time frame: 2 year
Number of Participants With Patient Reported Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis
Patients will independently complete the patient NRG Oncology cosmesis scale at designated timepoints. The evaluation categories are Excellent; Good; Fair; Poor. The outcome measure is the rate of good or excellent cosmesis scores relative to all cosmesis evaluations. The higher the fraction is considered the better outcome.
Time frame: 3 year
Local Control in the Treated Breast Relative to Historic Controls
Local control consists of annual clinical examination combined with breast imaging
Time frame: Through study completion estimated to be 10 years