This is a Phase 2b/3, multi-center, two part study, designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of PRO 140 in conjunction with existing ART (failing regimen) for one week and Optimized Background Therapy (OBT) for 24 weeks respectively. Study population includes treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients with CCR5-tropic virus who demonstrates evidence of HIV-1 replication despite ongoing antiretroviral therapy with documented genotypic or phenotypic resistance to ART drugs within three drug classes (or within two or more drug classes with limited treatment options).The options may be limited as a result of drug antiviral class cross-resistance or documented treatment intolerance.
PRO 140, in combination with other antiretroviral agents, is indicated for treatment experienced adult HIV-1 patients infected with CCR5-tropic virus. These patients must demonstrate evidence of HIV-1 replication despite ongoing antiretroviral therapy and have documented genotypic or phenotypic resistance to at least one ART drug within three drug classes (or within two or more drug classes with limited treatment option). The options may be limited as a result of drug antiviral class cross-resistance, documented treatment intolerance, documented objective assessments such as renal or hepatic insufficiency (e.g. high creatinine at baseline, limiting treatment options due to potential for toxicity), past adverse reactions such as hypersensitivity reactions or neuropsychiatric issues that could limit use of currently approved drugs. Study population includes treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients with CCR5-tropic virus who demonstrates evidence of HIV-1 replication despite ongoing antiretroviral therapy with documented genotypic or phenotypic resistance to ART drugs within three drug classes (or within two drug classes with limited treatment option). Enrollment will be stratified to have HIV-1 virus resistant to ART drugs within three drug classes or within two drug classes with limited treatment option. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy, clinical safety and tolerability parameters of PRO 140 compared to placebo in reducing HIV-1 viral load during the 1-week double-blind treatment period. The secondary objectives of the trial are to assess the efficacy, clinical safety and tolerability parameters of PRO 140 in combination with Optimized Background Therapy during the 24-week single-arm, open-label treatment period.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
52
CD02 Investigational site
Fountain Valley, California, United States
CD02 Investigational site
Long Beach, California, United States
CD02 Investigational site
Los Angeles, California, United States
CD02 Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, United States
CD02 Investigational site
Palm Springs, California, United States
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 0.5 log10 Reduction in HIV-1 RNA Viral Load From Baseline at the End of the 1-week Double-blind Treatment Period
The primary efficacy endpoint will be proportion of participants with a 0.5 log10 or greater reduction in HIV-1 RNA viral load from baseline at the end of the one week double-blind treatment period (Part 1).
Time frame: From baseline visit to week 1 visit
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 0.5 log10 Reduction in HIV-1 RNA Viral Load From Baseline at the End of the 1-week Double-blind Treatment Period, Stratified to Each Group: Resistance to ART Drugs Within Two Drug Class With Limited Treatment Option.
Proportion of participants with ≥ 0.5 log10 reduction in HIV-1 RNA viral load from baseline at the end of the 1-week double-blind treatment period, stratified to each group: a. resistance to ART drugs within two drug class with limited treatment option (N = 24). This outcome measures the proportion of participants that are classified as having a resistance to ART drugs within two drug classes and with limited treatment options with ≥ 0.5 log10 reduction in HIV-1 RNA viral load from baseline at the end of the 1-week double-blind treatment period . The total number of participants in the study ITT population, 52, is further stratified into two subgroups: 1. Participants with resistance to ART Drugs Within Two Drug Class With Limited Treatment Option (N = 24) 2. Participants with resistance to ART Drugs Within Three Drug Classes (N = 28) This measure includes only the 24 participants with Resistance to ART Drugs Within Two Drug Class With Limited Treatment Options
Time frame: From baseline visit to week 1 visit
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 0.5 log10 Reduction in HIV-1 RNA Viral Load From Baseline at the End of the 1-week Double-blind Treatment Period, Stratified to Each Group: Resistance to ART Drugs Within Three Drug Classes
Proportion of participants with ≥ 0.5 log10 reduction in HIV-1 RNA viral load from baseline at the end of the 1-week double-blind treatment period, stratified to each group: a. Resistance to ART drugs within three drug classes (N = 28) This outcome measures the proportion of participants that are classified as having a resistance to ART drugs within two drug classes and with limited treatment options with ≥ 0.5 log10 reduction in HIV-1 RNA viral load from baseline at the end of the 1-week double-blind treatment period . The total number of participants in the study ITT population, 52, is further stratified into two subgroups as follows: 1. Participants with Resistance to ART Drugs Within Two Drug Class With Limited Treatment Option (N = 24) 2. Participants with resistance to ART Drugs Within Three Drug Classes (N = 28) This measure includes only the 28 participants with resistance to ART drugs within three drug classes
Time frame: From baseline visit to week 1 visit
Mean Change From Baseline in HIV-1 RNA Levels (log10 Copies/mL) at the End of the 1-week Double-blind Treatment Period for All Patients and Within Each Stratum
The raw and change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA levels (log10 copies/mL) at the end of the 1-week double-blind treatment period was to be summarized by treatment group for the first week during the double-blind treatment phase. For change from baseline summaries, subjects with an undefined change from baseline, because of missing data, were to be excluded. The change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA levels was to be compared between the two (2) groups using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with the stratification factor (i.e., Resistance to ART drugs at the time of randomization) included in the model.
Time frame: From baseline visit to week 1 visit
Percentage of Participants Achieving HIV-1 RNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 25 for All Patients and Within Each Stratum
The number and percentages of subjects achieving HIV-1 RNA \< 400 copies/mL at Week 25, from the open label portion of the study, are presented
Time frame: 25 weeks
Percentage and Number of Participants Achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 25 for All Patients and Within Each Stratum
The number and percentages of subjects achieving HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at Week 25 are presented. This is from the 24 week open label portion of the of the trial.
Time frame: 25 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in HIV-1 RNA Levels (log10 Copies/mL) at Week 25 for All Patients and Within Each Stratum
The raw and change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA levels (log10 copies/mL) at Week 25 was to be summarized for each week during the treatment phase. For change from baseline summaries, subjects with an undefined change from baseline, because of missing data, were to be excluded.
Time frame: 25 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at the End of the 1-week Double-blind Treatment Period for All Patients and Within Each Stratum
The raw and change from baseline in CD4 cell count at the end of the 1-week double blind treatment period was to be summarized by treatment group for the first week during the double-blind treatment phase. For change from baseline summaries, subjects with an undefined change from baseline, because of missing data, were to be excluded.
Time frame: From baseline visit to week 1 visit
Mean Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 25 for All Patients and Within Each Stratum
The raw and change from baseline in CD4 cell count at Week 25 was to be summarized for each week during the treatment phase. For change from baseline summaries, subjects with an undefined change from baseline, because of missing data, were to be excluded.
Time frame: 25 weeks
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 log10 Reduction in HIV-1 RNA Viral Load From Baseline at the End of the 1-week Double-blind Treatment Period for All Patients and Within Each Stratum
The number and percentage of subjects with a ≥ 1log10 or greater reduction in HIV-1 RNA viral load from baseline was to be presented for the two (2) treatment groups. The analysis of change in viral load was done for subjects with ≥ 1.0 log10 reduction in HIV-1 RNA after the first week of treatment. The analysis is presented for the ITT population
Time frame: From baseline visit to week 1 visit
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
CD02 Investigational Site
San Francisco, California, United States
CD02 Investigational site
San Francisco, California, United States
CD02 Investigational Site
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
CD02 Investigational site
Norwalk, Connecticut, United States
CD02 Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
...and 26 more locations