Intuition vs. Deliberation in Medical Decision Making

University of Pennsylvania200 enrolled

Overview

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there are systematic differences between the decisions patients make intuitively versus deliberatively about life-sustaining medical therapies. The targeted population is inpatients at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania with serious medical problems. The study will involve facilitated interviews with patients using a survey instrument developed in Qualtrics.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

OTHER

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

200

Conditions

Decision Making About Life-sustaining Treatment in Patients With Serious Cardiac, Respiratory and Oncological Conditions Likely to Limit Life Expectancy

Interventions

Cognitive loadBEHAVIORAL

Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

Deliberative instructionsBEHAVIORAL

Patients in the deliberative arm will be given instructions to take their time and deliberate on their decisions

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 60 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 60 and older 2. Currently an inpatient at Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania 3. Speaks and reads fluently in English 4. Either 1. Has one of the following medical conditions: * Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with at least severe airflow obstruction on most recent spirometry and/or eligible for long-term oxygen therapy * Incurable interstitial lung disease with at least severe restriction on most recent pulmonary function tests and/or eligible for long-term oxygen therapy * Congestive heart failure with NYHA Class III or higher and current hospitalization related to heart failure * Acute myeloid leukemia * Stage IV lymphoma * Stage IIIB or Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, breast cancer, uterine cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, urothelial cancer * Stage C or D hepatocellular carcinoma * Mesothelioma or any malignancy metastatic to the pleura; or 2. Is hospitalized on oncology, pulmonary or cardiology service and has been hospitalized at least one other time during the last year on the same service 5. Stable vital signs Exclusion Criteria: 1. Notation of code status limitation in electronic medical record 2. Cognitive impairment to the point unable to give informed consent 3. Current feeding tube placement 4. Current tracheostomy 5. Severe pain, shortness of breath or other uncontrolled symptoms 6. Actively undergoing evaluation for solid organ transplant 7. First hospitalization after diagnosis of serious illness

Locations (1)

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Acceptance or Refusal of a Feeding Tube for Chronic Aspiration

Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding acceptance of a feeding tube for chronic aspiration. In this hypothetical scenario, patients are presented with a situation in which they are unable to eat or drink safely such that small amounts of food or liquid go to their lungs and cause trouble with breathing. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions. Cognitive load: Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

Acceptance or Refusal of Antibiotics

Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding acceptance of antibiotics. In this hypothetical scenario, patients are presented with an illness severity such that they drift in and out of consciousness some days and are expected to die in several months. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions. Cognitive load: Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

Acceptance or Refusal of Breathing Machine

Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding acceptance of a breathing machine. In this hypothetical scenario, patients are presented with a life-threatening illness with 50% chance of survival provided that they receive support from a breathing machine for two weeks. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions. Cognitive load: Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.

Secondary Outcomes

Scores on Uncertainty Subscale of Decisional Conflict Scale

Decisional uncertainty will be evaluated using the uncertainty subscale of the Decisional Conflict Scale ranging from 0-100 such that 0 = extremely CERTAIN about best choice and 100 = extremely UNCERTAIN about the best choice. Higher values represent MORE UNCERTAINTY with decisions regarding feeding tubes, antibiotics, intubation, and tracheostomy while lower values represent LESS UNCERTAINTY.

Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

Correlation Between Accepting Tracheostomy and Thinking That Being Bed Bound is Equal to or Worse Than Death

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept tracheostomy AND indicate that bed bound is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

Correlation Between Accepting Antibiotics and Thinking That Being Bed Bound is Equal to or Worse Than Death.

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept antibiotics AND indicate that bed bound is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

Correlation Between Accepting Tracheostomy and Thinking That Needing Care All the Time is Equal to or Worse Than Death

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept tracheostomy AND indicate that needing care all the time is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

Correlation Between Accepting Antibiotics and Thinking That Needing Care All the Time is Equal to or Worse Than Death

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept antibiotics AND indicate that needing care all the time is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

Correlation Between Accepting Tracheostomy and Thinking That Living in a Nursing Home is Equal to or Worse Than Death

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept tracheostomy AND indicate that living in a nursing home is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

Correlation Between Accepting Antibiotics and Thinking That Living in a Nursing Home is Equal to or Worse Than Death

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept antibiotics AND indicate that living in a nursing home is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

Correlation Between Accepting Tracheostomy and Thinking That Relying on a Breathing Machine is Equal to or Worse Than Death

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept tracheostomy AND indicate that relying on a breathing machine is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

Correlation Between Accepting a Feeding Tube and Thinking That Relying on a Feeding Tube is Equal to or Worse Than Death

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept a feeding tube AND indicate that relying on a feeding tube is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally