Multicenter, single arm, phase II study using a A'Hern single-stage procedure in patients with locally advanced or metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) in first-line treatment.
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 2-3% of all adult malignancies worldwide, representing the seventh most common cancer in men and the ninth in women. The annual incidence is more than 337 000 cases and around 140 000 persons die every year. Half of patients with RCC are going to develop metastases, either with synchronous metastatic sites (25%) or during the follow up (25%). Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) represents 10-15% of RCC and is characterized by a cytogenetic profile distinct from other types of renal cancer. Histologically, PRCC could be separated in 2 distinct subtypes: type 1 and type 2. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a potent induction factor, playing a central role in angiogenesis and vascular permeability of tumor tissues. It binds to three specific receptors: VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3, which are thus implicated in pathologic angiogenesis, tumor growth and metastatic progression of cancer. Patients with papillary histology demonstrated high expression of VEGF and VEGFR-2, making VEGF-targeted therapy an attractive therapeutic option. Recently, several studies have been developed to assess VEGF targeted therapy in patients with PRCC, mostly with sunitinib and with poor results (median progression-free survival (PFS) around 6 months). Axitinib is a potent, selective second-generation inhibitor of all three VEGF receptors. By inhibiting VEGF-mediated endothelial cell proliferation and survival, axitinib inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth. In phase II trials, axitinib has shown anti-tumor activity with well-tolerated clinical safety profile in patients with advanced solid tumors, including RCC. Axitinib has been approved for the second-line treatment of advanced RCC on the basis of the pivotal randomized phase III AXIS trial results. 723 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive axitinib or sorafenib. The median PFS assessed by independent review committee was 6.7 months with axitinib compared to 4.7 months with sorafenib (hazard ratio 0.665; 95% CI 0.544-0.812; one-sided p\<0.0001). In all studies, the safety analysis showed a good tolerance of axitinib. The most common adverse reactions (occurring in \>20% of treated subjects) were diarrhea, hypertension, fatigue, decreased appetite, nausea, dysphonia and hand-foot skin reaction. Dose discontinuations were reported in 4% of patients with axitinib vs. 8% with sorafenib. Little clinical data regarding the efficacy of recently developed VEGF targeted therapies in first-line treatment of PRCC is available. To date, there is no standard treatment, and evaluation of efficacy of the new targeted agents is clearly needed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of axitinib in first-line treatment of patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma. Axitinib inhibits angiogenesis and vascular permeability in tumor tissues, leading to inhibition of tumor growth. Axitinib has shown antitumor activity in patients with RCC in phase II and III clinical trials. VEGF inhibitors are currently used in PRCC treatment, with disappointing results. Axitinib is more potent and selective against the VEGFR family compared with sorafenib and sunitinib in biochemical assays, and could have a similar efficacy with lesser toxicities, therefore may provide a clinical benefit in patients with PRCC.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
44
axitinib 10mg twice a day
ICO Paul Papin
Angers, France
Chu Bordeaux
Bordeaux, France
Centre Francois Baclesse
Caen, France
Centre Geogres François Leclerc
Dijon, France
The efficacy of axitinib in first-line treatment of PRCC.
24-week progression-free rate
Time frame: 24-week
The safety of axitinib in patients with PRCC (NCI CTCAE v4)
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 16 then Month 4, 6, 8,10, 12, 14, 16,18
The progression-free survival (RECIST 1.1) in each PRCC subtypes
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 16 then Month 4, 6, 8,10, 12, 14, 16,18
The overall survival
Time frame: 43 month after first inclusion
The best response
the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 16 then Month 4, 6, 8,10, 12, 14, 16,18
the objective response rate
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 16 then Month 4, 6, 8,10, 12, 14, 16,18
the duration of response
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 16 then Month 4, 6, 8,10, 12, 14, 16,18
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Centre Leon Berard
Lyon, France
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, France
ICO - René Gauducheau
Saint-Herblain, France
Institut Claudius Regaud
Toulouse, France
ICL
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, France