Although circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been considered as the cornerstone for atrial fibrillation ablation, there has been a substantial recurrence rate. The investigators designed a prospectively randomized study to evaluate whether additional atrial ganglionated plexi ablation guided by the SUMO technology improves the clinical outcome in patients with persistent AF.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
60
CARTO- reconstruction LA, preferably during same rhythm as SUMO map (generally sinus rhythm) for use during registration of SUMO map in CARTO. Conventional PVI by circumferential antral ablation according to standard procedures. Exit and Entrance block conformation. Attempt to induce sustained atrial tachycardia. Optional mapping and ablation of post-ablation atrial tachycardia.
CARTO- reconstruction LA, preferably during same rhythm as SUMO map (generally sinus rhythm) for use during registration of SUMO map in CARTO. High frequency stimulation (HFS; 20-Hz frequency, 5-ms pulse duration, and 15-mA output) to access positive vagal response (the heart rate decreasing by 50% at baseline). RF Ablation of SUMO hotspots (in sinus rhythm if AF converts) • Target a region of 1.0-1.5 cm diameter around the SUMO 'hotspot'. Control HFS. Attempt to induce sustained atrial tachycardia. Optional mapping and ablation of post-ablation atrial tachycardia.
State Research Institute of CIrculation Pathology Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Novosibirsk, Russia
RECRUITINGNumber of patients without AF/AFl/AT
Time frame: 12 months
Time to first recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia (AF burden > 0,5%).
Time frame: 12 month
Amount of mIBG uptake on 6 and 12 month DSPECT imaging in comparison to baseline D-SPECT.
Time frame: 12 month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Implantation the ECG loop recorder according to standard procedure