Asthma is a leading cause of emergency department (ED) visits for children. A novel way of treating asthma is the use of positive expiratory pressure (PEP). Positive expiratory pressure works by creating pressure in the lungs to keep airways open and to clear mucus from the lungs. PEP is already used in the treatment of asthma at the investigators institution, but studies evaluating the efficacy of PEP therapy in asthma exacerbations do not exist. This study plans to learn more about the use of PEP therapy in the treatment of asthma exacerbations in children in the emergency department. Specifically, the study aims to evaluate if PEP therapy reduces the severity of asthma exacerbations in children and if it reduces the need for additional therapies and admission to the hospital. This study will be a randomized control trial comparing children who receive standard therapy to those who receive standard therapy plus PEP therapy in the treatment of asthma exacerbations. Children age 2 to 18 years presenting to the ED with moderate to severe asthma exacerbations will be included in the study. Reduction in clinical asthma severity will be measured by change in the Pulmonary Asthma Score (the respiratory severity score used at the investigators institution). The need for additional therapies and hospitalization will also be evaluated.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
52
Childrens Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Change in Pulmonary Asthma Score (PAS)
The primary outcome was the change in asthma severity as determined by change in Pulmonary Asthma Score (PAS) before and after administration of intervention (or control). The same trained, blinded physician assessor, who was not involved in the care of the patient, assessed PAS scores for study subjects before intervention (or control), and 15 minutes after completion of administration. The PAS is a pediatric asthma severity scoring system adapted from previously validated scores, and includes measures of respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, auscultory findings, retractions, and dyspnea. Values from each category are summed producing a total score between 5 and 15. Total scores \< 7 correspond with mild asthma exacerbations, while scores ≥ 7 and \< 12 indicate moderate asthma, and scores ≥12 to 15 indicate severe asthma. The primary outcome was determined by subtracting the post-intervention score from the pre-intervention score.
Time frame: 0-30 minutes
Number of Participants Requiring Second Line Therapies Including Continuous Albuterol, Subcutaneous Terbutaline, IV Magnesium and Supplemental Oxygen After Administration of Intervention or Control
Second line therapies include: continuous albuterol, intravenous magnesium sulfate, subcutaneous or intravenous terbutaline, non-invasive ventilation (BiPAP or CPAP), and supplemental oxygen. The need for these second line therapies will be assessed by the child's treating team in the Emergency Department.
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of ED stay, an expected average of 6-8 hours
Rate of Inpatient Hospitalization
Number of patients in each group requiring hospital admission
Time frame: After intervention or control and until follow-up phone call 72 hours after disposition
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.