The purpose of the study is to determine if performing different types of aerobic exercise (cycling) before upper extremity exercises will help to improve outcomes after stroke.
The goal of this study is to determine the potential for forced aerobic exercise to augment the recovery of motor function in individuals with stroke. Current approaches to stroke rehabilitation involve intensive, therapist-directed task practice that is both expensive and in some cases, ineffective in fostering functional neuromotor recovery. The identification of a safe, cost-effective approach, such as forced aerobic exercise, to augment the recovery of function achieved through task practice while simultaneously decreasing the cardiovascular risk factors prevalent in stroke survivors would be significant to rehabilitation and stroke communities. Animal studies along with preliminary human data indicate a specific type of aerobic exercise (AE), forced aerobic exercise (FE), may be ideal in facilitating motor recovery associated with repetitive task practice (RTP). The hypothesis is that that deficits in afferent input and motor cortical output following stroke prevents patients from achieving and maintaining an exercise intensity that is sufficient for facilitating motor recovery; therefore, FE is needed to augment their voluntary efforts and achieve greater gains in recovery. In previous research, a safe lower extremity FE intervention was initially applied to individuals with Parkinson's disease and subsequently to individuals with stroke. Preliminary results indicate that those completing an 8-week FE intervention paired with an abbreviated session of RTP exhibited significantly greater improvement in Fugl-Meyer scores at end of treatment despite completing 40% fewer RTP repetitions, compared to those receiving voluntary-rate aerobic exercise (VE) and RTP and time-matched RTP only. Improvements in cardiovascular fitness and lower extremity motor function were also evident in both groups that engaged in aerobic exercise (FE and VE). Positive results from a preliminary trial indicate safety, feasibility, and initial efficacy of combining two modes of aerobic exercise training with RTP provide rationale for a systematic and larger scale trial to determine the precise role of aerobic exercise, forced and voluntary, in facilitating motor recovery following stroke. For this study, 30 individuals with chronic stroke will be randomized into one of the following groups: FE = RTP, VE + RTP or patient education and RTP. All three groups will receive an identical dose of contact time over 8 weeks (3X per week). An intervention group receiving a 45-minute session of patient education paired with RTP will serve as the non-exercise control. Clinical and biomechanical outcomes measuring change in upper extremity motor function, lower extremity motor function, and cardiovascular fitness will provide the most complete picture, to date, on the potential neurologic effects of AE (forced and voluntary) on motor recovery and brain function in humans with stroke.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
34
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Fugl Meyer Assessment
Motor test to assess arm impairment. The reported data is the change in total score. Score range from 0-66 and higher scores represent less impairment.
Time frame: Change from baseline to midpoint (4 weeks into treatment), at end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
Wolf Motor Function Test
Motor test to assess arm function. The reported data is the change in total Functional Ability Score. Scores range from 0-75 and higher scores represent improved function.
Time frame: Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
Stroke Impact Scale
Quality of life questionnaire. The reported data is the normalized Hand Function score. Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better perceived hand function.
Time frame: Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
Metabolic Stress Test
Cycling test to measure cardiovascular fitness. The data reported is the change in VO2peak. Higher scores indicate higher aerobic capacities.
Time frame: Change from baseline to follow up assessments at end of 8 week intervention
Action Research Arm Test
Motor test to assess arm function. The reported data is change in total score. Scores range from 0-57, and higher scores indicate better function.
Time frame: Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression
Depression questionnaire. The reported data is change in total score. Scores range from 0-60, and lower scores indicate decreased risk of depression.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
Processing Speed Test
Matching letters and symbols to test cognition. The reported data is change in total number correct.
Time frame: Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
Nine Hole Peg Test
Transferring pegs into a fitted hole to measure hand function. The reported data is change in average time to complete.
Time frame: Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends
Six Minute Walk Test
Distance walked in 6 minutes to measure cardiovascular fitness. The reported data is change in total distance traveled.
Time frame: Change from baseline to end of 8 week intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention ends