The purposes of this study are 1) to assess foot strike patterns initially, at six months and at one year between two groups of runners attempting to transition to a non-rearfoot strike pattern (NRFS) with and without the use of biofeedback technology, and 2) to prospectively compare injury incidence rates at one year between NRFS and rearfoot strike (RFS) runners.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
191
Tibia accelerometer strapped to distal tibia to detect tibial shock
Change in Foot Strike Pattern From Baseline
Foot strike pattern will be either classified as rearfoot strike or non-rearfoot strike. This is determined by video analysis of 240hz camera. All participants baseline foot strike pattern was rearfoot at study enrollment.
Time frame: Immediately post-training, 6mo post-training, and 1yr post-training
Injury Incidence Between Foot Strike Patterns
Percentage of runners that became injured over 1 yr. Injury defined as pain in the lower extremity that caused restriction or stoppage of running for at least one week, or required the runner to consult a physician or other health care professional.
Time frame: 1yr
Relative Risk of Injury
Risk of runner to develop a knee injury based on foot-strike pattern
Time frame: 1yr
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.