This multicentre, open-label, Phase 1b/2 study is designed as a 2 part study consisting of a dose-escalation, safety run-in Part A and a dose-expansion Part B
The dose-escalation Part A of this study will involve patients with advanced solid malignancies refractory to standard therapy or for which no standard of care regimen currently exists. Approximately 30 evaluable patients per treatment arm (A1 or A2) will be enrolled. A3 will test viability of alternate dosing schedule for AZD5069, A4/A5 will evaluate AZD9150/AZD5069 in fixed dose combination with MEDI4736 and tremelimumab in solid tumors. there may also be safety run in cohorts enrolled (A6/A7) in specific solid tumor types (breast and prostate cancer). Once the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) for each of the 2 agents (AZD9150/AZD5069)in combination with MEDI4736 have been identified or the maximum doses of each of the 2 agents in combination with MEDI4736 have been reached, the dose expansion Part B of the study would commence. It will be conducted in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (RM) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Between 68 and 266 eligible patients will be enrolled and will randomly assigned to 1 of the following 6 treatment arms or non randomized arm B7: * Treatment arm B1: AZD9150 in combination with MEDI4736 in patients with prior exposure to anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies * Treatment arm B2: AZD5069 in combination with MEDI4736 in patients with prior exposure to anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies * Treatment arm B3: AZD9150 in combination with MEDI4736 in patients with no prior exposure to anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies (2L RM SCCHN) * Treatment arm B4: AZD5069 in combination with MEDI4736 in patients with no prior exposure to anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies * Treatment arm B5: AZD9150 alone in patients with no prior exposure to anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies * Treatment arm B6: AZD5069 alone in patients with no prior exposure to anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies * Treatment arm B7: (non randomized): AZD9150 in combination with MEDI4736 in patients with no prior exposure to anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies (1L RM SCCHN) * Treatment arm B8: (non randomized): AZD9150 (every two weeks) in combination with MEDI4736 in patients with no prior exposure to anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies (1L RM SCCHN)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
340
Part A: Danvatirsen With Durvalumab MTDs (Maximum Tolerated Dose) or Recommended Doses for Dose-expansion
After completion of DLT period (35 days) for the maximum dose cohort. A CRM-based approach was used to identify the set of dose combinations where the incidence of DLT was ≤ 33%. The dose with expected DLT incidence closest and below 0.33 at this point was the "model estimated" MTD. During trial execution, the Safety Review Committee (SRC) determined the MTD.
Time frame: 35 days
Part A: AZD5069 With Durvalumab MTDs (Maximum Tolerated Dose) or Recommended Doses for Dose-expansion
After completion of DLT period (35 days) for the maximum dose cohort. A CRM-based approach was used to identify the set of dose combinations where the incidence of DLT was ≤ 33%. The dose with expected DLT incidence closest and below 0.33 at this point was the "model estimated" MTD. During trial execution, the Safety Review Committee (SRC) determined the MTD.
Time frame: 35 days
Part A: Safety and Tolerability in Terms of Adverse Events
Number of subjects with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability including changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), safety and laboratory parameters
Time frame: At every treatment and follow up visit until disease progression, an average of 1 year.
Part B: ORR (Objective Response Rate) in Patients With IL/2L RM-SCCHN.
proportion of patients who have an objective response at a given visit. ORR will be summarised by treatment group. Objective rate is defined as a CR or PR according to RECIST 1.1.
Time frame: Assessed at every even-numbered cycles with RECIST until disease progression, up to 12 months.
Part A and B: AZD9150 AUC0-6h at Lead in Day-7
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to calculate AUC, we need to have enough PK samples collected to enable AUC estimation. That is why we have a difference in actual AUC calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
tremelimumab
Research Site
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Research Site
Duarte, California, United States
Research Site
La Jolla, California, United States
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, United States
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, United States
Research Site
Orange, California, United States
Research Site
San Francisco, California, United States
Research Site
Denver, Colorado, United States
Research Site
Plantation, Florida, United States
Research Site
Sarasota, Florida, United States
...and 34 more locations
Time frame: Lead in day -7, AUC from time 0 to 6h (post dose).
Part A and B: AZD9150 Cmax at Lead in Day -7
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to estimate Cmax we need to have samples at end of infusion, which was not available for all the subjects in PK analysis set. That is why there is a difference between Cmax calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Lead in day -7
Part A and B: AZD9150 AUC0-6h at Cycle 2 Day 1
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to calculate AUC, we need to have enough PK samples collected to enable AUC estimation. That is why we have a difference in actual AUC calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Cycle 2 day 1, AUC from time 0 to 6 h post dose
Part A and B: AZD9150 Cmax at Cycle 2 Day 1
Time frame: Cycle 2 day 1
Part A and B: AZD5069 AUC0-12h at Lead in Day -7
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to calculate AUC, we need to have enough PK samples collected to enable AUC estimation. That is why we have a difference in actual AUC calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Lead in day -7, AUC from time 0 to 12h post dose
Part A and B: AZD5069 Cmax at Lead in Day -7
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to estimate Cmax we need to have samples at Tmax, which was not available for all the subjects in PK analysis set. That is why there is a difference between Cmax calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Lead in day -7
Part A and B: AZD5069 Cssmax at Cycle 2 Day 1
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to estimate Cmax we need to have samples at around Tmax, which was not available for all the subjects in PK analysis set. That is why there is a difference between Cmax calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Cycle 2 day 1
Part A and B: AZD5069 AUCss at Cycle 2 Day 1
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to calculate AUC, we need to have enough PK samples collected to enable AUC estimation. That is why we have a difference in actual AUC calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Cycle 2 day 1
Part A and B: Durvalumab Cmax After Single Dose at Cycle 1 Day 1
Time frame: Cycle 1 day 1
Part A and B: Durvalumab Ctrough After Multiple Doses at Cycle 4 Day 1
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to estimate Ctrough we need to have samples at predose, which was not available for all the subjects in PK analysis set. That is why there is a difference between Ctrough calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Cycle 4 day 1
Part A and B: Durvalumab Cmax After Multiple Doses at Cycle 8 Day 1
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to estimate Cmax we need to have samples at end of infusion, which was not available for all the subjects in PK analysis set. That is why there is a difference between Cmax calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Cycle 8 day 1
Part A and B: Treme Cmax After Single Dose
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to estimate Cmax we need to have samples at end of infusion, which was not available for all the subjects in PK analysis set. That is why there is a difference between Cmax calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Cycle 1 day 1
Part A and B: Treme Ctrough After Multiple Doses at Cycle 4 Day 1
If a subjects had at least one post dose PK sample they were part of PK analysis set. However, to estimate Ctrough we need to have samples at predose, which was not available for all the subjects in PK analysis set. That is why there is a difference between Ctrough calculated number of subjects vs number of subjects participated.
Time frame: Cycle 4 day 1
Part A and B: Immunogenecity as Percent of ADA Positive Subjects
Subject was considered ADA positive if any post dose samples had ADA positive result. Result was not stratified based on post dose time points.
Time frame: Throughout the study, up to 3.3 years
Part A: Antitumour Activity in Monotherapy and Combination Arms of Study
complete response, partial response, stable disease or progressive disease based on RECIST
Time frame: assessed at every even numbered cycle with RECIST until disease progression, an average of 1 year
Part B: Safety and Tolerability in Terms of Adverse Events
Number of subjects with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability including changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), safety and laboratory parameters
Time frame: At every treatment and follow up visit until disease progression, an average of 1 year.
Part B: Secondary Measures Change in Efficacy - Disease Control Rate
Disease control rate is confirmed complete response (CR), confirmed partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD)
Time frame: Assessed at every even-numbered cycles. Assessed at every even numbered cycle with RECIST until disease progression, up to 12 months
Part B: Secondary Measures Change in Efficacy - Duration of Overall Response
Duration of overall response is according to RECIST 1.1 criteria measured from the time measurement criteria are first met for CR or PR, whichever is first recorded, until the first date that recurrent or PD is objectively documented (taking as reference for PD the smallest measurements recorded on study). DOR is only applied to treatment groups where at least one response patient was recorded.
Time frame: Assessed at every even-numbered cycles. Assessed at every even numbered cycle with RECIST until disease progression, up to 48 months
Part B: Secondary Measures Change in Efficacy - PFS
progression-free survival (PFS): defined as the time from randomisation to the first documentation of PD as determined by the Investigator or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Only includes progression events that occur within 126 days of the last evaluable assessment
Time frame: Assessed at every even-numbered cycles. Assessed at every even numbered cycle with RECIST until disease progression, up to 12 months
Part B: Secondary Measures Change in Efficacy - OS
overall survival (OS) - defined as the time from treatment allocation to death from any cause
Time frame: Assessed at every even-numbered cycles. Assessed at every even numbered cycle with RECIST until disease progression, up to 15 months
Part B: Secondary Measures Change in Efficacy - OS at 12 Months
proportion of patients alive at 12 months: the percentage of patients surviving at 12 months after randomization to study drug
Time frame: Assessed at every even-numbered cycles. Assessed at every even numbered cycle with RECIST until disease progression, up to 12 months
Part B: Evaluation of AZD9150 Pharmacodynamics: Change in STAT3 RNA Level From Baseline
Percent STAT3 RNA change in expression level in peripheral blood in patients who had baseline (Screening or Day -7) sample for comparison. Data were only available for B1, B3, B5, B7 and B8.
Time frame: At Cycle 2 Day 1 vs. Baseline
Part B: Evaluation of PDL1 Expression
Tumors with PDL1-positive tumor cells at the designated cutoff. Data were only available for B1, B2, B3, B4, B7 and B8.
Time frame: in baseline tumor samples