This is a 1-week dispensing, double-masked, randomized, bilateral study comparing the test lens against the control lens.
The order of lens wear (test lens first, control lens second or control lens first, test lens second) will be selected according to a randomization table. Both test and control lenses will be used in a daily wear modality for 1 week. It is anticipated that this study will involve following visits: Baseline (screening and dispense of 1st study pair of lenses, visit combined), 1-week visit (follow-up of the 1st study pair of lenses and dispense the 2nd study pair of lenses) and 2-week visit (1 week follow-up of the 2nd study pair of lenses).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
41
contact lens
contact lens
Center for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Comfort
Subjective ratings scale (0-100) assessed: 0=Cannot be worn, causes pain, 20=Frequently irritating, 40=Occasionally irritating, 60=Occasionally noticable but not irritating, 80=Rarely noticeable, 100=Cannot be felt ever. Time points for comfort: lens dispense at baseline, lens insertion at 1 week, and overall at 1 week.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week
Dryness
Subjective ratings scale (0-100): 0=Cannot be worn, extremely dry, 20=Frequently Irritating, 40=Occasionally irritating, 60=Occasionally noticeable but not irritating, 80=Rarely noticeable, 100=No dryness experienced at any time. Time points for dryness: lens dispense at baseline, lens insertion at 1 week, and overall at 1 week.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week
Lens Wettability
Grading scale 0-4, 0.25 steps, 0=excellent; 4=severely reduced.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week
Surface Appearance
Grade ratings category (smooth, grainy, or other)
Time frame: Baseline
Surface Appearance
Grade ratings category (smooth, grainy, or other)
Time frame: 1 week
High Contrast Acuity at High Room Illumination
Logarithm of the Minimum Angle or Resolution (LogMAR) Chart
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week
Lens Deposition
Lens Deposits Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps. 0=excellent; 4=severely reduced
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Lens Problems
Lenses were evaluated for defects, scratches, fibers, blue specks, and other findings.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week
Lens Centration
Lens centration was evaluated by the conjunctival overlap to determine whether lens was slightly or excessively decentered. (mm, 0.1 steps) N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior, N/S - Nasal/Superior, N/I - Nasal/Interior, T/S - Temporal/Superior T/I - Temporal/Interior
Time frame: Baseline
Lens Centration
Lens centration was evaluated by the conjunctival overlap to determine whether lens was slightly or excessively decentered. (mm, 0.1 steps) N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior, N/S - Nasal/Superior, N/I - Nasal/Interior, T/S - Temporal/Superior T/I - Temporal/Interior
Time frame: 1 week
Post-blink Movement
Post-blink movement evaluated by estimating the distance the lens was moving immediately after a blink. Primary Gaze: (mm, 0.1 steps)
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week
Lens Tightness
Lens tightness Scale 0%-100%, 0%=extremely loose fit, 50%=optimal push resistance and smooth return, 100%=no movement.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week
Visual Quality
Subjective ratings scale (0-100): 0=Extremely poor vision all of the time; cannot function, 20=Frequently annoying vision problems, 40=Occasionally annoying vision problems, 60=Occasionally noticeable but not annoying vision problems, 80=Rarely noticeable vision problems, 100=Excellent vision all of the time. Different time points were taken for vision quality: lens dispense at baseline, lens insertion at 1 week, and overall at 1 week.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week
Ease of Lens Insertion
Subjective ratings scale (0-100): 0=Could not place lens on eye, 20=Frequently takes multiple attempts to place on eye; often unsuccessful, 40=Frequently takes multiple attempts to place on eye, 60=Occasionally takes a few attempts to place on eye, 80=Rarely difficult to place on eye, 100=Always easy to place lens on eye
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week
Ease of Lens Removal
Subjective ratings scale (0-100): 0=Could not remove lens from eye, 20=Frequently takes multiple attempts to remove from eye; often unsuccessful, 40=Frequently takes multiple attempts to remove from eye, 60=Occasionally takes a few attempts to remove from eye, 80=Rarely difficult to remove from eye, 100=Always easy to remove lens from eye.
Time frame: 1 week
Overall Lens Fit
Overall Lens Fit Scale 0-4, 0.25 steps 0=Very poor (lens should not be worn at all); 1. Poor (lens could be worn with supervision only); 2. Fair (would prefer to refit, but clinically acceptable); 3. Good (fit could be slightly improved); 4. Very good (optimal)
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week
Bulbar Hyperemia
Bulbar hyperemia assessed using scale 0-4, 0.5 steps, 0=No hyperemia, 4=Severe hyperemia.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week
Limbal Hyperemia
Limbal hyperemia assessed using scale 0-4, 0.5 steps, 0=No hyperemia, 4=Severe hyperemia.
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week
Corneal Dehydration Staining
Corneal Staining: Dehydration Staining: Yes/No
Time frame: 1 week
Corneal Staining (Extent)
Corneal staining extent, grade as % of each zone: C - Central, N - Nasal, T - Temporal, S - Superior, I - Interior
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week
Conjunctival Indentation
Conjunctival Indentation 5 locations (central, nasal, temporal, superior, inferior): Scale 0-4, 0.5 steps; 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week.
Conjunctival Staining
Conjunctival Staining 5 locations (central, nasal, temporal, superior, inferior): Scale 0-4; 0.5 steps, 0=None,1=Minimal diffuse punctuate, 2=Coalescent punctuate, 3=Confluent, 4=Deep confluent
Time frame: Baseline and 1 week