Comparing New Prothesis PROPRIO-FOOT® Versus Usual Prothesis Tasks Tibial Amputees

University Hospital, Angers50 enrolled

Overview

Evaluate a new porosthetic device in lower limb amputees.

Randomisation between usual and new prosthesis Cross over study of walking performance and VO2 on treadmill with the two devices after 1 month adaptation to each system.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Lower Limb Amputation at Ankle (Injury)

Interventions

propriofoot prosthesisDEVICE

Adaptation of the device and evaluation after 1 month at home using the studied device

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Tibial amputation * Ability top walk on treadmill * Stable prosthesis for at least 3 months Exclusion Criteria: * Bilateral amputation * Cancer * Absence of consent

Locations (1)

Centre hospitalier universitaire

Angers, France

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

oxygen consumption

Measurement on treadmill

Time frame: 1 mois after adpatation of the selected device

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.