Individuals with ADHD are at markedly high risk for increased substance use and Substance Use Disorder (SUD). Given the strong evidence for the negative trajectory of individuals with co-occurring ADHD and substance use initiation, the goal of this study is to conduct a controlled examination of a brief, early intervention (BEI) for substance modified for adolescents with ADHD. Importantly, this intervention will address individuals who are at risk for problems with substance use, but do not yet meet criteria for severe SUD. Although brief interventions have been found to be effective in other populations, their efficacy in an ADHD population with emerging risk for substance use problems remains uninvestigated. This study aims to understand why some adolescents with ADHD and elevated risk for SUD respond to (BEI) and others do not. The investigators will test whether situational and individual characteristics predict substance use development and response to treatment. Further, this study will assess which types of additional treatment are most effective for youth who do not respond to the initial BEI. It is hypothesized that rates of adolescent substance use will be lower among adolescents who participate in study treatments.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a brief early intervention (BEI) for reducing early alcohol and marijuana use in a group of 300 adolescents (age 12-16) with ADHD. All adolescents will receive the BEI based on the Teen Intervene program with the addition of enhanced decision making skills. Due to the existing support for the intervention and concern for randomizing families with adolescents at risk for worsening substance use outcomes into a control (no treatment) condition for one to two years, no control condition is used in the current design at the first level of intervention. Similarly, due to the time required to see a potential effect of the treatment (6 months post-brief intervention), a wait-list control condition was not considered. Adolescents will be evaluated for treatment non-response at 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 months post-treatment. Non-response is defined as non-normative use of alcohol, marijuana, or other drugs during the past 90 days. Tobacco products are excluded from consideration. Adolescents who demonstrate non-response to the initial BEI at any of the follow-up assessments will be randomized to one of the following conditions: 1) Continued monitoring of substance use with no additional treatment 2) Parent training and adolescent cognitive behavioral therapy (PT/ACBT) 3) PT/ACBT plus concurrent stimulant medication (PT/ACBT + MED). Participants who are randomized will be assessed at 6 months post-treatment and again one year later. The difference in days of substance use at the follow-up assessments among the three conditions will inform which type of intervention is best for youth who do not respond to the initial BEI.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
158
Adolescents receive 5 individual sessions designed to strengthen the following skills: problem-solving, resisting peer pressure, and coping with emotions. Parents join portions of 3 sessions.
Participants receive 12 family sessions with individual adolescent, parent, and joint adolescent and parent time. Includes additional parent training in behavioral modification, adolescent and parent contracting, and adolescent decision-making skills.
Adolescents will receive methylphenidate.
Florida International University Center for Children and Families
Miami, Florida, United States
Number of Participants With Past 90-day Alcohol Use
Teen self-report of substance use during the past 90 days
Time frame: Assessed at 6 months after randomization to treatment
Number of Participants With Evidence of Illicit Substances in Urine Screen
Urine analysis indicates presence of illicit substance(s)
Time frame: Assessed at 6 months after randomization to treatment
Mean Youth-Report of Parent-adolescent Conflict
Youth report of conflict with parents on the Conflict Behavior Questionnaire. Higher scores reflect higher parent teen conflict. Total score equals the average across item scores (ranging 1 to 5).
Time frame: Assessed at 6 months after randomization to treatment
Mean Youth Self-Report of Disruptive Behaviors
Adolescent disruptive behaviors as measured by adolescent self-report and parent report on the Deviant Behavior Scale. Total scores on this measure reflect the average item rating across all items. Scores range from zero to 20 with higher scores reflecting self-report of engaging in more frequent deviant behaviors.
Time frame: Assessed at 6 months after randomization to treatment
Mean Youth Self-Report of Likelihood of Future Substance Use
Youth self-report of likelihood of future substance use during the next year. Score reflects participant report of likelihood of using substances over the next year on a scale from 0 (Definitely will not use) to 10 (Definitely will use).
Time frame: Assessed at 6 months after randomization to treatment
Mean Youth Self-Report of Functional Impairment
Level of impairment experienced across multiple domains of functioning (e.g., at school, at home, with peers) as measured by adolescent self-report on the Impairment Rating Scale. Total score is the mean item rating on a scale from 0 (No problem) to 6 (Extreme problem). Higher scores are indicative of greater impairment.
Time frame: Assessed at 6 months after randomization to treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.