To compare the overall survival of NSCLC patients receiving 2nd- or 3rd-line systemic therapy with docetaxel + plinabulin (DP Arm) to patients treated with docetaxel + placebo (D5W) (D Arm) for advanced or metastatic disease. Secondary purposes of the study are: * To compare overall response rate (ORR) of NSCLC patients receiving 2nd- or 3rd-line systemic therapy with docetaxel + plinabulin (DP Arm) to patients treated with docetaxel + placebo (D5W) (D Arm) for advanced or metastatic disease. * To compare progression free survival (PFS) of NSCLC patients receiving 2nd- or 3rd-line systemic therapy with docetaxel + plinabulin (DP Arm) to patients treated with docetaxel + placebo (D5W) (D Arm) for advanced or metastatic disease. * To compare incidence of Grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] \< 0.5 × 109/L) on Day 8 (+/- 1 day) of Cycle 1 of NSCLC patients receiving 2nd- or 3rd-line systemic therapy with docetaxel + plinabulin (DP Arm) to patients treated with docetaxel + placebo (D5W) (D Arm) for advanced or metastatic disease. * To compare 24-month and 36-month OS rate of NSCLC patients receiving 2nd- or 3rd-line systemic therapy with docetaxel + plinabulin (DP Arm) to patients treated with docetaxel + placebo (D5W) (D Arm) for advanced or metastatic disease.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. According to the World Health Organization's Global Cancer Observatory, there were an estimated 2.09 million new cases and 1.76 million deaths worldwide in 2018 (GLOBOCAN, 2018, Fact Sheet N⁰39). The lung cancer incidence and mortality in China is relatively high compared to most countries with an estimated 774,323 new cases and 690,567 deaths in 2018 (GLOBOCAN, 2018, Fact Sheet N⁰160 China). In the US, as per the estimates of the National Cancer Institute, there would be about 228,820 new cases and 135,720 deaths from lung cancer in 2020 accounting for approximately 22.4% of all cancer deaths (SEER program, 2020). About 84% of lung cancers are NSCLCs in the US (American Cancer Society, 2020). The prognosis for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, either at initial diagnosis or recurrence, remains grim. The standard of care has been chemotherapy with agents including platinum analogs, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, and pemetrexed with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors and for patients with appropriate disease genotypes, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors. First-line Therapy: For patients without specific molecular target, first-line therapy is usually a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-inhibitor or a platinum-containing, double agent regimen. Platinum can be either cisplatin or carboplatin, and the most commonly used drugs combined with platinum include paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine; other drugs such as irinotecan, etoposide, and vinblastine. The arrival of immunotherapy with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab effectively changed the first-line standard. Pembrolizumab is very effective, with a long Duration of Response (DoR), however response rates remain suboptimal (approximately 45% in first line \[Keytruda® Prescribing Information. 2020\]). Most patients will eventually fail first line therapy and docetaxel remains a valid treatment option when NSCLC patients fail to respond to targeted or immune-based therapies or become refractory to such therapies. For patients intolerant to platinum-containing regimens, platinum-free double-agent chemotherapy regimens are used as an alternative. For patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 2 and elderly patients, single-agent or double agent regimens are recommended. Approval has been obtained in China for the single agent gefitinib to be used in first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with sensitive mutation of EGFR tyrosine kinase gene. Second-line Therapy: Drugs used for second-line treatment include docetaxel, pemetrexed, EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for EGFR mutant patients, and the checkpoint inhibitors (such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab). Several second-line treatment drugs and regimens (docetaxel, pemetrexed, and ramucirumab combined with docetaxel) have been approved as single agents or combination for second-line therapy for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR wild type with limited efficacy, characterized by limited clinical improvement or overall survival (OS). EGFR wild type represents around 85% of western NSCLC population, and around 70% of Asian NSCLC population. Checkpoint inhibition with PD 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy or other checkpoint inhibitors have moved into first line and are increasingly not an option for 2nd/3rd line. This has created a situation where docetaxel-based regimens have become standard-of-care in 2nd/3rd line NSCLC. Therefore, the evaluation of plinabulin combined with docetaxel versus docetaxel alone has become highly relevant. Docetaxel, a taxane, binds to and stabilizes tubulin, thereby inhibiting microtubule disassembly resulting in cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase and subsequent cell death. In patients with NSCLC, previously treated with a platinum-based chemotherapy, second-line therapy with docetaxel afforded a median OS in the range from 5.7 to 7.5 months (Fossella, 2000; Shepherd, 2000). The most common AEs included infections, neutropenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia (FN), hypersensitivity, thrombocytopenia, neuropathy, dysgeusia, dyspnea, constipation, anorexia, nail disorders, fluid retention, asthenia, pain, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, mucositis, alopecia, skin reactions, and myalgia (Taxotere Prescribing Information, 2020). Since the approval of docetaxel in 1999 as the second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic NSCLC, other drugs, namely pemetrexed and erlotinib, have been approved for the same indication. However, despite the availability of newer treatments, patient survival has not improved over that achieved with docetaxel. The OS in these studies was found to remain in the range of 5.6 to 8.3 months (Hanna et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2008; Shepherd et al., 2005). A retrospective analysis of the plinabulin Phase 2 study suggests that plinabulin prolongs survival in NSCLC patients with measurable lung tumors. The expectation is that patients with a measurable lung lesion may still harbor antigens that are immunogenic, thus capable of still stimulating the immune system. Docetaxel treatment is expected to release these immunogens and plinabulin is expected to enhance presentation of these immunogens via dendritic cell activation, to the T-cell repertoire. This plinabulin study investigates the efficacy and safety of plinabulin and docetaxel combination in patients with EGFR wild type NSCLC and progressing tumors requiring second- or third- line therapy for advanced or metastatic disease after failing a platinum-containing regimen. The primary endpoint is OS, with docetaxel monotherapy as an active comparator.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
559
Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV + Plinabulin 30 mg/m2
Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV
Ironwood Cancer & Research Centers
Chandler, Arizona, United States
Pacific Cancer Medical Center, Inc.
Anaheim, California, United States
Innovative Clinical Research Institute
Whittier, California, United States
Memorial Health Care System
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Cancer Center of Central Connecticut
Plainville, Connecticut, United States
Overall Survival
Overall survival is defined as the time (days) from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause (i.e., Date of death - date of randomization +1).
Time frame: The time (Days) from the date of randomization to the date of death, up to 48 months
ORR
Overall response rate
Time frame: up to 2 years after study Initiation
PFS
Progress-free survival
Time frame: Up to 48 months after study initiation.
Severe Neutropenia
Percent of patients without severe neutropenia on Day 8 of Cycle 1
Time frame: Day 8 of Cycle 1 (±1 day)
Month 24 OS Rate
To compare 24-month overall survival rate
Time frame: up to 24months after study initiation
Month 36 OS Rate
To compare 36-month overall survival rate
Time frame: up to 36 months after study initiation
DoR
Duration of response
Time frame: Up to 2 years after study initiation.
Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / Quality of Life Score
The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status / Quality of Life scale was used. The Global Health Status / Quality of Life scale is transformed to a 0-100 scale according to the EORTC scoring manual. Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 100 Higher scores indicate better quality of life The reported values represent the mean change from baseline to end of treatment (end of treatment score minus baseline score).
Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (Last study assessment prior to treatment discontinuation), assessed up to 2 years after study initiation.
Q-TWiST
To compare the mean difference in quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease and toxicity
Time frame: up to 2 years after study initiation.
QoL (QLQ-LC13)
EORTC QLQ C30/QLQ LC13, this instrument consists of one multi-item dyspnea scale and several single item symptom scales (e.g. pain, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia and hemoptysis). All LC13 symptom scales were scored according to the EORTC QLQ C30/QLQ LC13 scoring manuals. On this 0-100 scale, higher scores represent a higher level of symptoms (worse outcome). The QLQ LC13 Symptom Combined Score used for this outcome is the average of all available LC13 symptom scale scores, if all 3 dyspnea items are non-missing, the dyspnea scale score and all other symptom scales are calculated and the Symptom Combined Score is the average of all available scales. The reported LSMeans (SE) and LSMeans differences (95% CI) are based on this 0-100 Symptom Combined Score, where 0 indicates no lung cancer-related symptoms and 100 indicates the highest level of symptoms.
Time frame: Up to 2 years after study initiation.
Proportion of Patients Who Received Docetaxel
To compare proportion of patients who received docetaxel \>8 cycles, \>10 cycles, and \>12 cycles
Time frame: Up to 29 cycles
Month 18 OS Rate
To compare 18-month overall survival rate
Time frame: up to 18 months after study initiation
Analysis of the Relative Dose Intensity of Docetaxel Over the First 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 Cycles
Relative Dose Intensity (RDI) was defined as the ratio of the actual delivered dose intensity to the planned dose intensity of docetaxel. Dose intensity was calculated as the total dose (mg/m²) divided by the actual cycle duration (days) and normalized to the planned 21-day treatment cycle. Thus, RDI = \[(Actual dose / actual duration) / (Planned dose / 21 days)\]. RDI values were summarized as mean (SD), median, and range per treatment group after 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 cycles." Note: Analysis population: ITT (Docetaxel \[D\] n=281; Docetaxel + Plinabulin \[DP\] n=278). Means (SD) were calculated using participants with available data at each duration; therefore, the number analyzed varies by row.
Time frame: First Cycle 1 Day 1 to the end of Cycle 12 (approximately up to 36 weeks)
Month 12 OS Rate
To compare 12-month overall survival rate
Time frame: up to 12 months after study initiation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Peachtree Hematoloy-Oncology Consultants, PC
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Orchard Healthcare Research Inc.
Skokie, Illinois, United States
Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, United States
Kansas University Medical Center
Westwood, Kansas, United States
University of Louisville-Brown Cancer Center
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
...and 47 more locations