The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity. However, the first generation of these devices had no positive impact on the mortality after PCI (compared to bare metal stents), which was greatly attributed to a somewhat increased incidence of late and very late stent thrombosis. Concerns about the role of durable polymers as a potential trigger of inflammation and finally adverse events also led to the development of DES with bioresorbable coatings, which leave after degradation of the coating only a bare metal stent in the vessel wall that does not induce an inflammatory response. While such bioresorbable polymer DES are increasingly used in clinical practice, data from head-to-head comparisons between bioresorbable polymer DES with a contemporary highly flexible new generation permanent polymer coated DES.
rationale: The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity. However, the first generation of these devices had no positive impact on the mortality after PCI (compared to bare metal stents), which was greatly attributed to a somewhat increased incidence of late and very late stent thrombosis. Concerns about the role of durable polymers as a potential trigger of inflammation and finally adverse events also led to the development of DES with bioresorbable coatings, which leave after degradation of the coating only a bare metal stent in the vessel wall that does not induce an inflammatory response. While such bioresorbable polymer DES are increasingly used in clinical practice, data from head-to-head comparisons between bioresorbable polymer DES with a contemporary highly flexible new generation permanent polymer coated DES. Aim: The aim of the study is to compare the outcome of the bioresorbable polymer coated stent (ORSIRO) and a new generation permanent polymer coated stent (RESOLUTE ONYX) in an all-comers patient population and non-inferiority setting. Study design: The study is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multicentre trial with 1:1 randomization for drug-eluting stent type, stratified for gender and the presence of diabetes mellitus. Study population: Patients who require percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of coronary stenoses with an indication for DES use, according to current guidelines and/or the operators clinical judgement. All clinical syndromes will be included. A total of 2,470 patients will be included. Intervention: One group will receive the ORSIRO stent, the other group will receive the RESOLUTE ONYX stent. All other intervention and procedural characteristics are similar. Primary study outcome: Incidence of target vessel failure (TVF) at 1 year follow-up (according to ARC definitions). Components of the primary endpoint in hierarchical order: - Cardiac death: all deaths are considered cardiac, unless an unequivocal non-cardiac cause can be established. - Target vessel related myocardial infarction (MI) that is Q-wave or non-Q-wave, that can be related to the target vessel or cannot be related to another vessel. - Clinically driven repeated target vessel revascularization by means of PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
2,470
stents will be implanted in case of significant coronary artery disease
stents will be implanted in case of significant coronary artery disease based on coronary angiography
CHU Charleroi
Charleroi, Belgium
Jessa Ziekenhuis
Hasselt, Belgium
Rambam
Haifa, Israel
Haga Ziekenhuis
The Hague, South Holland, Netherlands
Rijnstate Hospital
Arnhem, Netherlands
Treant Zorggroep
Emmen, Netherlands
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede, Netherlands
Target vessel failure (TVF)
Composite endpoint consisting of: Cardiac death (All deaths are considered cardiac, unless an unequivocal non-cardiac cause can be established); Target vessel related MI (Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction that can be related to the target vessel or cannot be related to another vessel); Clinically driven repeated target vessel revascularization by means of CABG or PCI.
Time frame: 1 year
Death at 1 and 2 year follow-up
Death distinguished into: cardiac, vascular, other causes, all-cause mortality
Time frame: 1 and 2 year
Myocardial infarction at 1 and 2 year follow-up
Myocardial infarction distinguished into Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction
Time frame: 1 and 2 year
Revascularization at 1 and 2 year follow-up
Target-vessel revascularization distinguished into PCI or CABG
Time frame: 1 and 2 year
Stent thrombosis at 1 and 2 year follow-up
Stent thrombosis was distinguished into definite, probable and possible according to the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definition.
Time frame: 1 and 2 year
Target lesion failure (TLF) at 1 and 2 year follow-up
Composite endpoint consisting of : cardiac death; target vessel-related MI; clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)
Time frame: 1 and 2 year
Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 and 2 year follow-up
Composite endpoint consisting of: 1. any death; 2. any myocardial infarction 3. emergent CABG; 4. clinically indicated TLR
Time frame: 1 and 2 year follow-up
Patient oriented composite endpoint (POCE) at 1 and 2 year follow-up
Composite endpoint consisting of: any death; any myocardial infarction; any revascularization.
Time frame: 1 and 2 year follow-up
Major Bleeding at 1 and 2 year follow-up
Major bleeding that require surgery or blood transfusions or cerebral hemorrhages
Time frame: 1 and 2 year follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.