The primary purpose of this study is to examine the safety and feasibility of delivering allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells (allo-MSCs) by transendocardial injection to cancer survivors with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction secondary to anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC). The secondary purpose of this study is to obtain preliminary evidence for therapeutic efficacy of allo-MSCs delivered by transendocardial injection to cancer survivors with LV dysfunction secondary to AIC.
This phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled, trial will evaluate the safety and feasibility of allo-MSCs administered by transendocardial injection in thirty-seven subjects with anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC). The first six subjects received allo-MSC therapy (open label) and were assessed for safety and feasibility of the study procedures. Following 1 month data review of each of the six subjects by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Gene and Cell Therapy Data Safety Monitoring Board; this was followed by a randomized, double-blind clinical trial enrolling thirty-one subjects. These subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive allo-MSCs or placebo. All subjects underwent cardiac catheterization and study product administration using the NOGA Myostar catheter injection system. Subjects are being followed at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months post study product injection. All endpoints are assessed at the 6 and 12 month visits which will occur 180 ±30 days and 365 ±30 days, respectively, after the day of study product injection (Day 0). For the purpose of the safety evaluations and endpoint analysis, the Investigators will utilize an "intention-to-treat" study population. In addition, because this phase I study is the first cell therapy study in this population, at 12 months available standard-of-care medical records for cancer surveillance will be reviewed for cancer recurrence.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
46
20 transendocardial injections of 0.4ml allo-MSCs administered to the left ventricle via NOGA Myostar injection catheter (single procedure)
20 transendocardial injections of 0.4ml Buminate solution administered to the left ventricle via NOGA Myostar injection catheter (single procedure)
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, United States
University of Florida-Department of Medicine
Gainesville, Florida, United States
University of Miami-Interdiciplinary Stem Cell Institute
Miami, Florida, United States
Indiana Center for Vascular Biology and Medicine
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Proportion of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
Proportion of adjudicated events including death, hospitalization for worsening heart failure, and/or other exacerbation of heart failure (non-hospitalization).
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Proportion of Other Significant Clinical Events
Proportion of other significant adjudicated clinical events including: non-fatal stroke, non-fatal MI, coronary artery revascularization, ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, pericardial tamponade, infectious myocarditis, hypersensitivity reaction, neoplasm, and/or other potential deleterious late effects.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Subjects With Events Precluding Their Receipt of Product
Number and percent of subjects with events between randomization and study product injection (SPI) that preclude the subject from receiving product.
Time frame: Randomization to SPI
Subjects Who Receive Less Than 20 Injections During SPI
Number and percent of subjects who receive less than 20 injections during SPI
Time frame: During SPI procedure
Subjects Who Did Not Receive the Study Product (Either 100 Million Cells or Placebo)
Number and percent of subjects who did not receive the study product (either 100 million cells or placebo)
Time frame: During SPI procedure
Subjects Who Have at Least One Cardiac MRI Endpoint Measure That is Uninterpretable
Number and percent of subjects who have at least one cardiac MRI endpoint measure that is uninterpretable due to issues related to the device, including, but not limited to, inability to undergo the procedure.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Texas Heart Institute
Houston, Texas, United States
Subjects Who Fail to Complete Follow-up
Number and percent of subjects who fail to complete follow up
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction as assessed via cardiac MRI.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Time frame: Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Change From Baseline in Global Strain (HARP MRI)
Change in global circumferential strain as assessed via cardiac MRI
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change From Baseline in Global Strain (HARP MRI)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Time frame: Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Change From Baseline in Regional Strain (HARP MRI)
Change in regional longitudinal strain as assessed via cardiac MRI
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change From Baseline in Regional Strain (HARP MRI)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Time frame: Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI)
Change in left ventricular end diastolic volume index as measured via cardiac MRI
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Time frame: Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI)
Change in left ventricular end systolic volume index as assessed via cardiac MRI
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Time frame: Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Sphericity Index
Change in Left Ventricular Sphericity Index as assessed by cardiac MRI. Sphericity index is the ratio of the long and short axis measurements of the left ventricle.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Sphericity Index-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model. Sphericity index is the ratio of the long and short axis measurements of the left ventricle.
Time frame: Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Change From Baseline in Area of Injury
Change in the scar percent (scar mass normalized to left ventricular mass) as assessed via cardiac MRI.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change From Baseline in Area of Injury-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Time frame: Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Change From Baseline in Exercise Tolerance (Six Minute Walk Test)
Change in the distance walked (in meters) as measured by the six minute walk test. Two walk tests were completed at each endpoint visit (separated by 30 min). The average distance of the two walk tests will be used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change From Baseline in Exercise Tolerance (Six Minute Walk Test)-Trajectory
Change in the distance walked (in feet) as measured by the six minute walk test. Two walk tests were completed at each endpoint visit (separated by 30 min). The average distance of the two walk tests will be used for analysis. The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Time frame: Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Change From Baseline in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire Score
Change in the quality of life summary score as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Minimum and maximum scores for scale are 0 and 105 respectively. Lower scores indicative of better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change From Baseline in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire Score-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model. Minimum and maximum scores for scale are 0 and 105 respectively. Lower scores indicative of better outcome.
Time frame: Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)
Change in N-Terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) as measured via laboratory blood draw
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Time frame: Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Cumulative Days Alive and Out of Hospital for Heart Failure
Days alive and out of hospital for heart failure during the study evaluation period. Subjects were allotted a visit window extending 30 days past their anticipated 12-month visit (i.e., 395 days).
Time frame: Baseline to End of 12 Month Visit Window (i.e. 395 days after intervention)