The investigational device that will be used in this trial is the EndoStim® Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) Stimulation System. The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the safety and the effectiveness of electrical stimulation therapy (EST) on the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in the treatment of subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The study population will consist of subjects diagnosed with pathological GERD as defined by abnormal pH and who complain of heartburn, regurgitation or both for \> 6 months, on a daily PPI use.
Study Design: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. All subjects undergo screening and baseline visits, followed by system implantation, and randomization after 2 weeks to either a treatment Group (stimulation) or Control Group (delayed stimulation). Randomized subjects complete a 10-week, double-blind phase. At the 14-week visit, subjects are unblinded, control group subjects begin receiving stimulation, and all subjects are followed for an additional 9-month open-label treatment phase. Subjects continue receiving stimulation for an extended follow-up phase involving annual visits through 5 years. Study Visits: Screening and baseline visits. Laparoscopic implantable pulse generator (IPG) and lead implant procedure. Post-implant follow-up office visits at 2 weeks/randomization, 6, 10, 14, 24 and 48 weeks, followed by annual visits through 5 years. Sample Size and Scope: Forty-six subjects will be implanted and followed to 12 months after stimulation treatment at 3 investigational sites.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
1
EST placement
Device programming by the technician to deliver the EST system active (Treatment group) or no stimulation (Control group) for the following 12 weeks, at the 2 weeks visit.
Device programming by the technician to deliver the EST system no stimulation for the following 12 weeks at the 2 weeks visit. Active Electric Stimulation Therapy will be programmed at the 14 weeks visit.
Gastroenterology Department, Erasme University Hospital
Brussels, Belgium
Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Service d'Explorations Fonctionnelles Digestives, Pavillons H et L, 5 Place d'Arsonval
Lyon, Lyon Cedex 3, France
Efficacy of EST on GERD symptoms (mean improvement in the GERD- health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores from baseline in control and treatment groups)
Comparison between Treatment and Control Groups of the mean improvement in the composite GERD-HRQL scores from baseline measured after at least 14 days off proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)
Time frame: 14 weeks
Safety (Rate of occurrence of device- and procedure-related adverse events)
Time frame: 12 months
Number of subjects achieving GERD symptom success
Improvement in the total GERD-HRQL score of 50% or more compared to pre-implantation score off PPI
Time frame: 12 months
Reflux symptoms measured by GERD-HRQL score
Mean improvement in the composite GERD-HRQL scores from baseline measured after at least 14 days off proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)
Time frame: 6 months
Reflux symptoms measured by GERD-HRQL score
Mean improvement in the composite GERD-HRQL scores from baseline measured after at least 14 days off proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)
Time frame: 12 months
Number of subjects able to stop regular use of acid-suppression
Defined as 50% or more days without PPI use
Time frame: 12 months
Number of subjects able to stop all use of acid-suppression medication
Time frame: 12 months
Percentage of asymptomatic patients
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Defined as an improvement in their total GERD-HRQL score of 50% or more compared to pre-implantation score off PPI) in treatment and control groups, off-PPI for the last 2 weeks.
Time frame: 14 weeks
Incidence of reflux esophagitis
Time frame: 12 months
Quality of life measured by EQ-5D EuroQol score
Difference in patient's EQ-5D score, compared to pre-implantation score on and off PPI.
Time frame: 14 weeks
Quality of life measured by EQ-5D score
Difference in patient's EQ-5D score, compared to pre-implantation score on and off PPI.
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of life measured by EQ-5D score
Difference in patient's EQ-5D score, compared to pre-implantation score on and off PPI.
Time frame: 12 months
Efficacy of EST on acid reflux measured by esophageal pH
Difference in % 24 hour esophageal pH\<4 in Treatment and Control groups (total, upright, supine, postprandial (2h)).
Time frame: 14 weeks
Efficacy of EST on acid reflux measured by DeMeester score
Difference in DeMeester score in Treatment and Control groups.
Time frame: 14 weeks
Percentage of subjects achieving pH success
Defined as normalization (pH \< 4 for no more than 4.1% of monitoring time) or \> 50% improvement in their distal esophageal acid exposure compared to their baseline off-PPI distal esophageal pH.
Time frame: 14 weeks
Efficacy of EST on reflux episodes measured by esophageal impedance
Difference in the number of reflux episodes (total, upright, supine, postprandial (2h), acidic, weakly acidic, weakly alkaline, and proximal extent (15 cm) in Treatment and Control groups.
Time frame: 14 weeks
Difference in lower esophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure and integrated relaxation pressure at 4 seconds (IRP4s) in Treatment and Control groups
Time frame: 14 weeks
Comparison of GERD-HRQL scores in Treatment and Control groups
Time frame: 14 weeks
Comparison of quality of life measured by EQ-5D in Treatment and Control groups
Time frame: 14 weeks