This is a first time in human (FTIH), open-label, non-randomized, multicenter study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and preliminary clinical activity of GSK3174998 administered intravenously to participants with selected advanced or recurrent solid tumors. This dose-escalation study will assess the safety, activity of GSK3174998 as monotherapy (Part 1), in combination with pembrolizumab (Part 2), and potentially in combination with additional therapies. The study will be conducted in 2 parts, each part consisting of starting with a dose-escalation phase followed by a cohort expansion phase. GSK3174998 will first be evaluated as monotherapy in escalating doses. Once a dose of GSK3174998 has been identified that is both tolerable and demonstrates pharmacodynamic activity, enrollment of Part 2 may begin. In Part 2, escalating doses of GSK3174998 will be evaluated with fixed doses of pembrolizumab. The maximum duration of treatment with GSK3174998 and pembrolizumab will be approximately 2 years or 35 cycles, whichever comes first. The follow-up period for safety assessments will be a minimum of 3 months from the date of the last dose. The post-treatment follow-up period will include disease assessments every 12 weeks until documented progressive disease (PD). Approximately 141 participants with selected advanced or recurrent solid tumors will be enrolled.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
141
Lyophilized powder 40 mg reconstituted to get a dose range of 0.003 to \<=10 mg/kg to be given as IV infusion for 30 minutes (min), Q3W
Pembrolizumab as 100 mg/4 milliliter (mL) solution (dose: 200 mg) to be given as IV infusion for 30 min, Q3W
GSK Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, United States
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Villejuif, France
GSK Investigational Site
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Part 1: Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Non-serious Adverse Event (Non-SAE)
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulting in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment was categorized as SAE.
Time frame: Up to maximum 39 weeks
Part 2A: Number of Participants With Any SAE and Non-SAE
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulting in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment was categorized as SAE.
Time frame: Up to maximum 105 weeks
Part 2B: Number of Participants With Any SAE and Non-SAE
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulting in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment was categorized as SAE.
Time frame: Up to maximum 33 weeks
Part 1: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
An adverse event was considered as DLT if it was considered by the investigator to be clinically relevant and attributed (definitely, probably or possibly) to study treatment, occurred within the first 28 days of the treatment, and met 1 of the following criteria: Hematologic: Febrile neutropenia, Grade4 neutropenia of \>7days requiring Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), Grade4 anemia of any duration, Grade4 thrombocytopenia of any duration or Grade3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding as described in National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE version 4). Non-hematologic: Grade4 toxicity, Grade3 toxicity that cannot be controlled within 3days, Ocular toxicity of \>=Grade3 or of Grade2 requiring systemic steroids. Any other event results in permanent discontinuation of treatment during the first 4 weeks of treatment or any other event which in the judgment of the investigator and GlaxoSmithKline medical monitor is considered to be a DLT.
Time frame: 28 days
Part 2A: Number of Participants With DLTs
An adverse event was considered as DLT if it was considered by the investigator to be clinically relevant and attributed (definitely, probably or possibly) to study treatment, occurred within the first 28 days of the treatment, and met 1 of the following criteria: Hematologic: Febrile neutropenia, Grade4 neutropenia of \>7days requiring Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), Grade4 anemia of any duration, Grade4 thrombocytopenia of any duration or Grade3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding as described in National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE version 4). Non-hematologic: Grade4 toxicity, Grade3 toxicity that cannot be controlled within 3days, Ocular toxicity of \>=Grade3 or of Grade2 requiring systemic steroids. Any other event results in permanent discontinuation of treatment during the first 4 weeks of treatment or any other event which in the judgment of the investigator and GlaxoSmithKline medical monitor is considered to be a DLT.
Time frame: 28 days
Part 2B: Number of Participants With DLTs
An adverse event was considered as DLT if it was considered by the investigator to be clinically relevant and attributed (definitely, probably or possibly) to study treatment, occurred within the first 28 days of the treatment, and met 1 of the following criteria: Hematologic: Febrile neutropenia, Grade4 neutropenia of \>7days requiring Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), Grade4 anemia of any duration, Grade4 thrombocytopenia of any duration or Grade3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding as described in National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE version 4). Non-hematologic: Grade4 toxicity, Grade3 toxicity that cannot be controlled within 3days, Ocular toxicity of \>=Grade3 or of Grade2 requiring systemic steroids. Any other event results in permanent discontinuation of treatment during the first 4 weeks of treatment or any other event which in the judgment of the investigator and GlaxoSmithKline medical monitor is considered to be a DLT.
Time frame: 28 days
Part 1: Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event Leading to Withdrawal (AELD) From the Study
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Number of participants with any adverse event leading to withdrawal from the study is presented.
Time frame: Up to maximum 39 weeks
Part 2A: Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event Leading to Withdrawal From the Study
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Number of participants with any adverse event leading to withdrawal from the study is presented.
Time frame: Up to maximum 105 weeks
Part 2B: Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event Leading to Withdrawal From the Study
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Number of participants with any adverse event leading to withdrawal from the study is presented.
Time frame: Up to maximum 33 weeks
Part 1: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions or Delay
Number of participants who had any dose reduction or dose delay (GSK3174998) due to any reason have been presented.
Time frame: Up to maximum 39 weeks
Part 2A: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions or Delay
Number of participants who had any dose reduction or dose delay (GSK3174998) due to any reason have been presented.
Time frame: Up to maximum 105 weeks
Part 2B: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions or Delay
Number of participants who had any dose reduction or dose delay (GSK3174998) due to any reason have been presented.
Time frame: Up to maximum 33 weeks
Part 1: Number of Participants With Any Grade Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of following hematology parameters: hemoglobin (Hb), leukocyte count (leuko.), lymphocyte count (Lymph.), neutrophil count (Neutro.) and platelet count (PC). The laboratory parameters were graded according to NCI-CTCAE version 4. Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe or medically significant; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences. Baseline was defined as the most recent, non-missing value from a central laboratory prior to or on the first study treatment dose date (Day 1). Any grade increase is defined as an increase in NCI-CTCAE grade relative to Baseline grade. Data for worst-case post Baseline is presented. Only those participants with any grade increase have been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to maximum 39 weeks
Part 2A: Number of Participants With Any Grade Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of following hematology parameters: Hb, leuko., Lymph., Neutro. and PC. The laboratory parameters were graded according to NCI-CTCAE version 4. Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe or medically significant; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences. Baseline was defined as the most recent, non-missing value from a central laboratory prior to or on the first study treatment dose date (Day 1). Any grade increase is defined as an increase in NCI-CTCAE grade relative to Baseline grade. Data for worst-case post Baseline is presented. Only those participants with any grade increase have been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to maximum 105 weeks
Part 2B: Number of Participants With Any Grade Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of following hematology parameters: Hb, leuko., Lymph., Neutro. and PC. The laboratory parameters were graded according to NCI-CTCAE version 4. Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe or medically significant; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences. Baseline was defined as the most recent, non-missing value from a central laboratory prior to or on the first study treatment dose date (Day 1). Any grade increase is defined as an increase in NCI-CTCAE grade relative to Baseline grade. Data for worst-case post Baseline is presented. Only those participants with any grade increase have been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to maximum 33 weeks
Part 1: Number of Participants With Any Grade Change From Baseline in Liver Function Laboratory Parameters
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of following liver function laboratory parameters: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and bilirubin. The laboratory parameters were graded according to NCI-CTCAE version 4. Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe or medically significant; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences. Baseline was defined as the most recent, non-missing value from a central laboratory prior to or on the first study treatment dose date (Day 1). Any grade increase is defined as an increase in NCI-CTCAE grade relative to Baseline grade. Data for worst-case post Baseline is presented. Only those participants with any grade increase have been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to maximum 39 weeks
Part 2A: Number of Participants With Any Grade Change From Baseline in Liver Function Laboratory Parameters
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of following liver function laboratory parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and bilirubin. The laboratory parameters were graded according to NCI-CTCAE version 4. Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe or medically significant; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences. Baseline was defined as the most recent, non-missing value from a central laboratory prior to or on the first study treatment dose date (Day 1). Any grade increase is defined as an increase in NCI-CTCAE grade relative to Baseline grade. Data for worst-case post Baseline is presented. Only those participants with any grade increase have been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to maximum 105 weeks
Part 2B: Number of Participants With Any Grade Change From Baseline in Liver Function Laboratory Parameters
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of following liver function laboratory parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and bilirubin. The laboratory parameters were graded according to NCI-CTCAE version 4. Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe or medically significant; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences. Baseline was defined as the most recent, non-missing value from a central laboratory prior to or on the first study treatment dose date (Day 1). Any grade increase is defined as an increase in NCI-CTCAE grade relative to Baseline grade. Data for worst-case post Baseline is presented. Only those participants with any grade increase have been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to maximum 33 weeks
Part 1: Number of Participants With Any Grade Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
SBP and DBP were graded using NCI-CTCAE version 4. For SBP: Grade 0: \<120 millimeter mercury (mmHg); Grade 1: 120-139 mmHg; Grade 2: 140-159 mmHg; Grade 3: \>=160 mmHg. For DBP: Grade 0: \<80 mmHg; Grade 1: 80-89 mmHg; Grade 2: 90-99 mmHg; Grade 3: \>=100 mmHg. Baseline was defined as the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date (Day 1). Any grade increase is defined as an increase in NCI-CTCAE grade relative to Baseline grade. Data for worst-case post Baseline is presented. Only those participants with any grade increase have been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to maximum 39 weeks
Part 2A: Number of Participants With Any Grade Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP
SBP and DBP were graded using NCI-CTCAE version 4. For SBP: Grade 0: \<120 mmHg; Grade 1: 120-139 mmHg; Grade 2: 140-159 mmHg; Grade 3: \>=160 mmHg. For DBP: Grade 0: \<80 mmHg; Grade 1: 80-89 mmHg; Grade 2: 90-99 mmHg; Grade 3: \>=100 mmHg. Baseline was defined as the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date (Day 1). Any grade increase is defined as an increase in NCI-CTCAE grade relative to Baseline grade. Data for worst-case post Baseline is presented. Only those participants with any grade increase have been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to maximum 105 weeks
Part 2B: Number of Participants With Any Grade Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP
SBP and DBP were graded using NCI-CTCAE version 4. For SBP: Grade 0: \<120 mmHg; Grade 1: 120-139 mmHg; Grade 2: 140-159 mmHg; Grade 3: \>=160 mmHg. For DBP: Grade 0: \<80 mmHg; Grade 1: 80-89 mmHg; Grade 2: 90-99 mmHg; Grade 3: \>=100 mmHg. Baseline was defined as the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date (Day 1). Any grade increase is defined as an increase in NCI-CTCAE grade relative to Baseline grade. Data for worst-case post Baseline is presented. Only those participants with any grade increase have been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to maximum 33 weeks
Part 1: Number of Participants With Worst Case Change From Baseline in Heart Rate (HR)
Baseline was defined as the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post Baseline value minus Baseline value. Number of participants with worst case change from Baseline in heart rate is presented. Data was categorized as: heart rate 'decrease to low', 'increase to high' and 'change to normal or no change'; where low HR: \<60 beats per minute \[bpm\]', normal HR: 60 to 100 bpm and high HR: \>100 bpm. If values were unchanged (example: increase to \>100 bpm to increase to \>100 bpm), or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'change to normal or no change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had both 'decreased to low' and 'increased to high' during post Baseline, so the percentages might not add to 100%.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to maximum 39 weeks
Part 2A: Number of Participants With Worst Case Change From Baseline in HR
Baseline was defined as the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post Baseline value minus Baseline value. Number of participants with worst case change from Baseline in heart rate is presented. Data was categorized as: heart rate 'decrease to low', 'increase to high' and 'change to normal or no change'; where low HR: \<60 bpm', normal HR: 60 to 100 bpm and high HR: \>100 bpm. If values were unchanged (example: increase to \>100 bpm to increase to \>100 bpm), or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'change to normal or no change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had both 'decreased to low' and 'increased to high' during post Baseline, so the percentages might not add to 100%.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to maximum 105 weeks
Part 2B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Change From Baseline in HR
Baseline was defined as the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post Baseline value minus Baseline value. Number of participants with worst case change from Baseline in heart rate is presented. Data was categorized as: heart rate 'decrease to low', 'increase to high' and 'change to normal or no change'; where low HR: \<60 bpm', normal HR: 60 to 100 bpm and high HR: \>100 bpm. If values were unchanged (example: increase to \>100 bpm to increase to \>100 bpm), or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'change to normal or no change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had both 'decreased to low' and 'increased to high' during post Baseline, so the percentages might not add to 100%.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to maximum 33 weeks
Part 1: Number of Participants With Worst Case Change From Baseline in Body Temperature
Baseline was defined as the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post Baseline value minus Baseline value. Number of participants with worst case change from Baseline in body temperature is presented. Data was categorized as: 'decrease to low', 'increase to high' and 'change to normal or no change'; where low body temperature: \<=35 degrees Celsius, normal body temperature: 35 to 38 degrees Celsius and high body temperature: \>=38 degrees Celsius. If values were unchanged (example: increase to \>=38 degrees Celsius to increase to \>=38 degrees Celsius), or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'change to normal or no change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had both 'decreased to low' and 'increased to high' during post Baseline, so the percentages might not add to 100%.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to maximum 39 weeks
Part 2A: Number of Participants With Worst Case Change From Baseline in Body Temperature
Baseline was defined as the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post Baseline value minus Baseline value. Number of participants with worst case change from Baseline in body temperature is presented. Data was categorized as: 'decrease to low', 'increase to high' and 'change to normal or no change'; where low body temperature: \<=35 degrees Celsius, normal body temperature: 35 to 38 degrees Celsius and high body temperature: \>=38 degrees Celsius. If values were unchanged (example: increase to \>=38 degrees Celsius to increase to \>=38 degrees Celsius), or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'change to normal or no change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had both 'decreased to low' and 'increased to high' during post Baseline, so the percentages might not add to 100%.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to maximum 105 weeks
Part 2B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Change From Baseline in Body Temperature
Baseline was defined as the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post Baseline value minus Baseline value. Number of participants with worst case change from Baseline in body temperature is presented. Data was categorized as: 'decrease to low', 'increase to high' and 'change to normal or no change'; where low body temperature: \<=35 degrees Celsius, normal body temperature: 35 to 38 degrees Celsius and high body temperature: \>=38 degrees Celsius. If values were unchanged (example: increase to \>=38 degrees Celsius to increase to \>=38 degrees Celsius), or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'change to normal or no change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had both 'decreased to low' and 'increased to high' during post Baseline, so the percentages might not add to 100%.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to maximum 33 weeks
Part 1: Number of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
A 12-lead ECG was obtained after the participant had rested at least 10 minutes in a semi-recumbent or supine position during the study using ECG machine. Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition. Number of participants with worst case post Baseline abnormal clinical significant ECG findings are presented.
Time frame: Up to maximum 39 weeks
Part 2A: Number of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal Clinically Significant ECG Findings
A 12-lead ECG was obtained after the participant had rested at least 10 minutes in a semi-recumbent or supine position during the study using ECG machine. Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition. Number of participants with worst case post Baseline abnormal clinical significant ECG findings are presented.
Time frame: Up to maximum 105 weeks
Part 2B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal Clinically Significant ECG Findings
A 12-lead ECG was obtained after the participant had rested at least 10 minutes in a semi-recumbent or supine position during the study using ECG machine. Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition. Number of participants with worst case post Baseline abnormal clinical significant ECG findings are presented.
Time frame: Up to maximum 33 weeks
Part 1: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a confirmed complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) as the Best Overall Response (BOR), as assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1 criteria. CR: Disappearance of all lesions in two consecutive observations not less than 4 weeks apart. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeter. PR: \>=30 percent (%) decrease in tumor burden compared with Baseline in two observations at least 4 weeks apart.
Time frame: Up to maximum 39 weeks
Part 2A: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a confirmed CR or PR as the BOR, as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v 1.1 criteria. CR: Disappearance of all lesions in two consecutive observations not less than 4 weeks apart. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeter. PR: \>=30% decrease in tumor burden compared with Baseline in two observations at least 4 weeks apart.
Time frame: Up to maximum 105 weeks
Part 2B: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a confirmed CR or PR as the BOR, as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v 1.1 criteria. CR: Disappearance of all lesions in two consecutive observations not less than 4 weeks apart. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeter. PR: \>=30% decrease in tumor burden compared with Baseline in two observations at least 4 weeks apart.
Time frame: Up to maximum 33 weeks
Part 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR)
DCR is defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR or PR at any time, plus stable disease (SD) \>=12 weeks as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v 1.1 criteria. CR: Disappearance of all lesions in two consecutive observations not less than 4 weeks apart. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeter. PR: \>=30% decrease in tumor burden compared with Baseline in two observations at least 4 weeks apart. SD: 30% decrease in tumor burden compared with Baseline cannot be established nor 20% increase compared with nadir.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Up to maximum 39 weeks
Part 2A: Disease Control Rate (DCR)
DCR is defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR or PR at any time, plus SD \>=12 weeks as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v 1.1 criteria. CR: Disappearance of all lesions in two consecutive observations not less than 4 weeks apart. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeter. PR: \>=30% decrease in tumor burden compared with Baseline in two observations at least 4 weeks apart. SD: 30% decrease in tumor burden compared with Baseline cannot be established nor 20% increase compared with nadir.
Time frame: Up to maximum 105 weeks
Part 2B: Disease Control Rate (DCR)
DCR is defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR or PR at any time, plus SD \>=12 weeks as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v 1.1 criteria. CR: Disappearance of all lesions in two consecutive observations not less than 4 weeks apart. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeter. PR: \>=30% decrease in tumor burden compared with Baseline in two observations at least 4 weeks apart. SD: 30% decrease in tumor burden compared with Baseline cannot be established nor 20% increase compared with nadir.
Time frame: Up to maximum 33 weeks
Part 1: Plasma Concentrations of GSK3174998 at Indicated Time Points
Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of GSK3174998 were collected on Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hour, 24 hour after end of GSK3174998 infusion (EOI); anytime on Days 8, 15, 29 and 36; Days 43, 64, 85, 106: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion.
Time frame: Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hours, 24 hours after end of GSK3174998 infusion; anytime on Days 8,15,29,36; Days 43, 64, 85, 106: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion
Part 2A: Plasma Concentrations of GSK3174998 at Indicated Time Points
Blood samples for PK analysis of GSK3174998 were collected on Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hour, 24 hour after end of GSK3174998 infusion (EOI); anytime on Days 8, 15, 29 and 36; Days 43, 64, 85, 106: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion.
Time frame: Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hours, 24 hours after end of GSK3174998 infusion; anytime on Days 8,15,29,36; Days 43, 64, 85, 106: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion
Part 2B: Plasma Concentrations of GSK3174998 at Indicated Time Points
Blood samples for PK analysis of GSK3174998 were collected on Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hour, 24 hour after end of GSK3174998 infusion (EOI); anytime on Days 8, 15, 29 and 36; Days 43, 64, 85, 106: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion.
Time frame: Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hours, 24 hours after end of GSK3174998 infusion; anytime on Days 8,15,29,36; Days 43, 64, 85, 106: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion
Part 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of GSK3174998
Blood samples for PK analysis of GSK3174998 were collected on Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hour, 24 hour after end of GSK3174998 infusion; anytime on Days 8, 15, 29 and 36; Day 43: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion. Each dosing cycle was of 21 days. PK parameters of GSK3174998 were calculated using non-compartmental methods.
Time frame: Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hours, 24 hours after end of GSK3174998 infusion; anytime on Days 8,15,29,36; Day 43: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion (each dosing cycle was of 21 days)
Part 2A: AUC(0-tau) of GSK3174998
Blood samples for PK analysis of GSK3174998 were collected on Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hour, 24 hour after end of GSK3174998 infusion; anytime on Days 8, 15, 29 and 36; Day 43: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion. Each dosing cycle was of 21 days. PK parameters of GSK3174998 were calculated using non-compartmental methods.
Time frame: Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hours, 24 hours after end of GSK3174998 infusion; anytime on Days 8,15,29,36; Day 43: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion (each dosing cycle was of 21 days)
Part 2B: AUC(0-tau) of GSK3174998
Blood samples for PK analysis of GSK3174998 were collected on Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hour, 24 hour after end of GSK3174998 infusion; anytime on Days 8, 15, 29 and 36; Day 43: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion. Each dosing cycle was of 21 days. PK parameters of GSK3174998 were calculated using non-compartmental methods.
Time frame: Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hours, 24 hours after end of GSK3174998 infusion; anytime on Days 8,15,29,36; Day 43: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion (each dosing cycle was of 21 days)
Part 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) and Minimum Observed Concentration (Cmin) of GSK3174998
Blood samples for PK analysis of GSK3174998 were collected on Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hour, 24 hour after end of GSK3174998 infusion; anytime on Days 8, 15, 29 and 36; Days 43, 64, 85, 106: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion. Each dosing cycle was of 21 days. PK parameters of GSK3174998 were calculated using non-compartmental methods.
Time frame: Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hours, 24 hours after end of GSK3174998 infusion; anytime on Days 8,15,29,36; Days 43, 64, 85, 106: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion (each dosing cycle was of 21 days)
Part 2A: Cmax and Cmin of GSK3174998
Blood samples for PK analysis of GSK3174998 were collected on Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hour, 24 hour after end of GSK3174998 infusion; anytime on Days 8, 15, 29 and 36; Days 43, 64, 85, 106: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion. Each dosing cycle was of 21 days. PK parameters of GSK3174998 were calculated using non-compartmental methods.
Time frame: Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hours, 24 hours after end of GSK3174998 infusion; anytime on Days 8,15,29,36; Days 43, 64, 85, 106: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion (each dosing cycle was of 21 days)
Part 2B: Cmax and Cmin of GSK3174998
Blood samples for PK analysis of GSK3174998 were collected on Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hour, 24 hour after end of GSK3174998 infusion; anytime on Days 8, 15, 29 and 36; Days 43, 64, 85, 106: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion. Each dosing cycle was of 21 days. PK parameters of GSK3174998 were calculated using non-compartmental methods.
Time frame: Days 1, 22: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 4 hours, 24 hours after end of GSK3174998 infusion; anytime on Days 8,15,29,36; Days 43, 64, 85, 106: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes after end of GSK3174998 infusion (each dosing cycle was of 21 days)
Part 2A: Plasma Concentrations of Pembrolizumab at Indicated Time Points
Blood samples for PK analysis of pembrolizumab were collected on Day 1: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 24 hours after end of pembrolizumab infusion (EOPI); anytime on Days 8,15; Pre-dose on Days 22, 64, 106.
Time frame: Day 1: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 24 hours after end of pembrolizumab infusion; anytime on Days 8,15; Pre-dose on Days 22, 64, 106
Part 2B: Plasma Concentrations of Pembrolizumab at Indicated Time Points
Blood samples for PK analysis of pembrolizumab were collected on Day 1: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 24 hours after EOPI; anytime on Days 8,15; Pre-dose on Days 22, 64, 106.
Time frame: Day 1: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 24 hours after end of pembrolizumab infusion; anytime on Days 8,15; Pre-dose on Days 22, 64, 106
Part 2A: AUC(0-tau) of Pembrolizumab
Blood samples for PK analysis of pembrolizumab were collected on Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 24 hours after EOPI; anytime on Days 8,15, Pre-dose on Day 22 (each dosing cycle was of 21 days). PK parameters of pembrolizumab were calculated using non-compartmental methods.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 24 hours after end of pembrolizumab infusion; anytime on Days 8,15, Pre-dose on Day 22 (each dosing cycle was of 21 days)
Part 2B: AUC(0-tau) of Pembrolizumab
Blood samples for PK analysis of pembrolizumab were collected on Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 24 hours after EOPI; anytime on Days 8,15, Pre-dose on Day 22 (each dosing cycle was of 21 days). PK parameters of pembrolizumab were calculated using non-compartmental methods.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 24 hours after end of pembrolizumab infusion; anytime on Days 8,15, Pre-dose on Day 22 (each dosing cycle was of 21 days)
Part 2A: Cmax of Pembrolizumab
Blood samples for PK analysis of pembrolizumab were collected on Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 24 hours after EOPI; anytime on Days 8,15, Pre-dose on Day 22 (each dosing cycle was of 21 days). PK parameters of pembrolizumab were calculated using non-compartmental methods.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 24 hours after end of pembrolizumab infusion; anytime on Days 8,15, Pre-dose on Day 22 (each dosing cycle was of 21 days)
Part 2B: Cmax of Pembrolizumab
Blood samples for PK analysis of pembrolizumab were collected on Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 24 hours after EOPI; anytime on Days 8,15, Pre-dose on Day 22 (each dosing cycle was of 21 days). PK parameters of pembrolizumab were calculated using non-compartmental methods.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 24 hours after end of pembrolizumab infusion; anytime on Days 8,15, Pre-dose on Day 22 (each dosing cycle was of 21 days)
Part 2A: Cmin of Pembrolizumab
Blood samples for PK analysis of pembrolizumab were collected on Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 24 hours after EOPI; anytime on Days 8,15; Pre-dose on Days 22; Cycle 3 (Day 64), Cycle 5 (Day 106) (each dosing cycle was of 21 days). PK parameters of pembrolizumab were calculated using non-compartmental methods.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 24 hours after end of pembrolizumab infusion; anytime on Days 8,15; Pre-dose on Days 22; Cycle 3 (Day 64), Cycle 5 (Day 106) (each dosing cycle was of 21 days)
Part 2B: Cmin of Pembrolizumab
Blood samples for PK analysis of pembrolizumab were collected on Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 24 hours after EOPI; anytime on Days 8,15; Pre-dose on Days 22; Cycle 3 (Day 64), Cycle 5 (Day 106) (each dosing cycle was of 21 days). PK parameters of pembrolizumab were calculated using non-compartmental methods.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose and within 30 minutes, 24 hours after end of pembrolizumab infusion; anytime on Days 8,15; Pre-dose on Days 22; Cycle 3 (Day 64), Cycle 5 (Day 106) (each dosing cycle was of 21 days)
Part 1: Number of Participants With Positive Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) Against GSK3174998
Serum samples were collected for the determination of anti-GSK3174998 antibodies using binding ADA assay method using a tiered testing schema: screening, confirmation and titration steps. The presence of treatment emergent ADA was determined using a GSK3174998 bridging style ADA assay with a bio-analytically determined cut-point determined during assay validation. Samples taken after dosing with GSK3174998 that had a value at or above the cut-point was considered treatment-emergent ADA-positive. These ADA positive samples were further evaluated in a confirmatory assay, and confirmed positive samples were further characterized by assessment of titer. Number of participants with confirmed positive anti-GSK3174998 antibodies results at any visit during the study have been presented.
Time frame: Up to maximum 39 weeks
Part 2A: Number of Participants With Positive ADAs Against GSK3174998
Serum samples were collected for the determination of anti-GSK3174998 antibodies using binding ADA assay method using a tiered testing schema: screening, confirmation and titration steps. The presence of treatment emergent ADA was determined using a GSK3174998 bridging style ADA assay with a bio-analytically determined cut-point (determined during assay validation). Samples taken after dosing with GSK3174998 that had a value at or above the cut-point was considered treatment-emergent ADA-positive. These ADA positive samples were further evaluated in a confirmatory assay, and confirmed positive samples were further characterized by assessment of titer. Number of participants with confirmed positive anti-GSK3174998 antibodies results at any visit during the study have been presented.
Time frame: Up to maximum 105 weeks
Part 2B: Number of Participants With Positive ADAs Against GSK3174998
Serum samples were collected for the determination of anti-GSK3174998 antibodies using binding ADA assay method using a tiered testing schema: screening, confirmation and titration steps. The presence of treatment emergent ADA was determined using a GSK3174998 bridging style ADA assay with a bio-analytically determined cut-point (determined during assay validation). Samples taken after dosing with GSK3174998 that had a value at or above the cut-point was considered treatment-emergent ADA-positive. These ADA positive samples were further evaluated in a confirmatory assay, and confirmed positive samples were further characterized by assessment of titer. Number of participants with confirmed positive anti-GSK3174998 antibodies results at any visit during the study have been presented.
Time frame: Up to maximum 33 weeks
Part 2A: Number of Participants With Positive ADAs Against Pembrolizumab
Serum samples were collected for the determination of anti-pembrolizumab antibodies using binding ADA assay method using a tiered testing schema: screening, confirmation and titration steps. The presence of treatment emergent ADA was determined using a pembrolizumab bridging style ADA assay with a bio-analytically determined cut-point (determined during assay validation). Samples taken after dosing with pembrolizumab that had a value at or above the cut-point was considered treatment-emergent ADA-positive. These ADA positive samples were further evaluated in a confirmatory assay, and confirmed positive samples were further characterized by assessment of titer. Number of participants with confirmed positive anti-pembrolizumab antibodies results at any visit during the study have been presented.
Time frame: Up to maximum 105 weeks
Part 2B: Number of Participants With Positive ADAs Against Pembrolizumab
Serum samples were planned to be collected for the determination of anti-pembrolizumab antibodies using binding ADA assay method using a tiered testing schema: screening, confirmation and titration steps.
Time frame: Up to maximum 33 weeks