Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL) is a heterogenic malignancy with poor outcome. Five-year PFS and OS for these patients received classic CHOP regimen (cyclophosphamide, vincristin, doxorubicin and prednisone) is less than 30%.High dose intensive chemotherapy doesn't demonstrate better response. At present, there is no standardized treatment protocol for this kind of lymphoma. So, clinical trials are encouraged by NCCN for those patients.
For the less efficacy of CHOP or CHOP-like regimen, multi-drug combination strategy has been the therapy tendency in PTCL. The novel regimen IVE/MTX (ifosfamide, etoposide,epirubucin/methotrexate)-ASCT(autologous stem-cell transplantation ) was piloted for patients eligible for intensive treatment, followed by auto-stem cell transplantation. Five-years PFS (progression-free survival) and OS (overall survival) were 52% and 60% respectively, significantly improved compared with the historical group treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The encouraged results were extended to the peripheral T cell lymphoma-non specified (PTCL-NOS). Former studies reported that GDP (gemcitabine, cis-platinum, and dexamethasone) compared with CHOP as the therapy strategy for PTCL-NOS (not otherwise specified). The response rate was 78.57% in GDP group and 60.00% in CHOP group respectively. DFS (disease-free survival) was 9.79 and 4.2 months in above two groups. They concluded that GDP is superior with CHOP. The main side-effect of two regimens is hematological toxicity. Furthermore, high-dose combined with ASCT has been the first-line therapy for PTCL. However, only about 30% patients with PTCL have chance to receive ASCT for multiple reasons. So it is urgent to explore new combination-therapy regimen to improve the outcome for patients with PTCL. The aim of our study is to compare the response and survival rate of CEOP/IVE/GDP (cyclophosphamide, vincristin, epirubucin and prednisone/ ifosfamide, epirubucin, and etoposide/ gemcitabine, cis-platinum, and dexamethasone) with those of CEOP regimen, looking forward to its superiority in efficacy and safety for the newly diagnosed adult patients with PTCL.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
106
CEOP: Cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2, ivgtt D1 Epirubucin 70mg/m2,ivgtt D1 Vincristine 1.4mg/m2(max 2mg), ivgtt D1 Prednisone 60mg/m2 (max 100mg),PO,D1-D5 IVE: Ifosfamide 2000mg/m2,ivgtt D1-D3 Epirubucin 70mg/m2, ivgtt D1 Etoposide 100mg/m2, ivgtt D1-D3 GDP: Gemcitabine 1g/m2,ivgtt D1,D8 Cis-platinum 25mg/m2, ivgtt D1-D3 Dexamethasone 40mg, ivgtt D1-D4
CEOP: Cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2, ivgtt D1 Epirubucin 70mg/m2,ivgtt D1 Vincristine 1.4mg/m2(max 2mg), ivgtt D1 Prednisone 60mg/m2 (max 100mg),PO,D1-D5 every 21 days for total 6 courses
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
Henan Cancer Hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Shandong Provincial Hospital
Jinan, Shandong, China
Shanghai Ruijin Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Percentage of patients with complete remission (CR)
Time frame: 6 months
progression-free survival
Time frame: 2 year since randomization
overall survival
Time frame: 2 year since randomization
overall response rate
Time frame: 6 months
adverse events
Time frame: from randomization to one month after last cycle of treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.