randomized controlled trial Eligiblility criteria Provisional diagnosis Clinical presentation Progressive dysmenorrhea Chronic pelvic pain Deep dyspareunia Evidences of endometriosis Endometriotic nodule Cul-de-sac nodularity Endometrioma detected by ultrasonography size \< 4 cm Inclusion criteria Female age 18-45 yr Moderate to severe pelvic pain categorized by VAS \>50 Previous sexual intercourse Exclusion criteria Co-existing other genital tract disease associated pain Previous hormonal use within 3 months History of DMPA treatment failure WHO eligibility criteria 2009 for DMPA and LNG-IUS Category 3,4 Fertility desire in upcoming 1 year Primary objective To compare efficacy of pain control in endometriosis associated pelvic pain between LNG-IUS and DMPA Secondary objective To compare side effect, continuation rate, satisfaction and quality of life between LNG-IUS and DMPA in treatment of endometriosis associated pelvic pain Primary outcome Severity of pelvic pain Measured by VAS score 0 mean no pain 100 mean most pain Secondary outcomes Vaginal bleeding pattern Side effects of systemic progestogen Lipid profiles Weight gain Quality of life Measured by quesionaire SF36 Satisfaction Measrured by linket scale 0-4 0 mean very dissatisfied 1 dissatisfied 2 not satisfied and dissatiffied 3 satisfied 4 very satisfied Continuation rate Endometrioma size reduction
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
50
King Chulalongkorn Memmorial hospital
Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand
Severity of pelvic pain : measured by visual analog scale
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of life measured by Quesionaire SF 36 Thai version
Time frame: 6 months
Lipid profile : total cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL, HDL
Measured by blood collection in mg/dl
Time frame: 6months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.