The primary aim of the study is to compare two techniques for treatment of total knee infection: resection total knee arthroplasty with an articulating (motion in the joint) spacer and resection total knee arthroplasty with a static (no motion in the joint) spacer.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
4
Joint spacer for treatment of joint infection
Joint spacer for treatment of joint infection
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Number of Subjects With Repeat Infections
The rate of repeat infections after re-implantation Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Time frame: 1 year post-operatively
Change in Total Knee Replacement Functional Scores
Functional scores were measured using the Knee Society Score, a clinical standard for rating the outcome of total knee replacements. Scores range from 0 -100, where a higher score reflects a more positive outcome for the subject.
Time frame: baseline, 1 year post-operatively
Pre-operative Range of Motion (ROM)
The degree of knee flexion was measured pre-operatively.
Time frame: baseline
Post-operative Range of Motion (ROM)
The degree of knee flexion was measured one year post-operatively.
Time frame: 1 year post-operatively
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.