On 6 Feb 2014, Pristiq was approved for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder(MDD) in Korea. In accordance with the Standards for Re-examination of New Drug, it is required to conduct a PMS for 600 patients by 5 Feb 2020. Post marketing surveillance is required to determine any problems or questions associated with Pristiq after marketing, with regard to the following clauses under conditions of general clinical practice. Therefore, through this study, effectiveness and safety of pristiq will be observed.
The objective of this study is to determine any problems or questions associated with Pristiq after marketing, with regard to the following clauses under conditions of general clinical practice, in compliance with the regulation "Re-examination guideline of new drugs (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety Notification 2013-251, 2013.12.20)". 1. Serious adverse event/adverse drug reaction 2. Unexpected adverse event/adverse drug reaction that have not been reflected in the approved drug label. 3. Known adverse drug reaction 4. Non-serious adverse drug reaction 5. Other safety and effectiveness information
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
700
Chungbuk National University Hospital
Cheongju-si, Chungcheonbuk-do, South Korea
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Time frame: Up to 8 weeks
Number of Participants in Each Category of Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale
CGI-I scale was a 7-point scale used to assess clinical effectiveness on a range of 1 to 7; where, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = No change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. Higher score indicated worse condition/lower clinical effectiveness.
Time frame: At Week 8
Number of Participants With Final Effectiveness Evaluation
Final effectiveness was evaluated as 'improved', 'no change', 'worse' or 'unevaluable' based on overall participant's clinical response after 8 weeks of Pristiq administration (as part of routine care), where, Improved = there was the improvement of symptoms related to major depressive disorder, No change = there was no significant change compared to participant's status before Pristiq administration, Worse = symptoms were getting worse compared to participant's status before Pristiq administration, Unevaluable = the medical charts do not had adequate progress notes to make a judgment on clinical response.
Time frame: At Week 8
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital/Department of Neuropsychiatry
Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi Province, South Korea
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital
Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Roa Neurology Clinic/Neurology
Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Bundang Cha Medical Center
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Konkuk University Chungju Hospital / Department of Psychiatry
Chungju, North Chungcheong, South Korea
Bong Seng Memorial Hospital
Busan, South Korea
Pusan National University Hospital
Busan, South Korea
Kyungpook National University Hospital
Daegu, South Korea
...and 12 more locations